Cargando…
Antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is the most frequently isolated strain in failed endodontic therapy cases since it is resistant to calcium hydroxide (CH). Whether a combination of CH and chlorhexidine (CHX) is more effective than CH alone against E. faecalis is a matter of controversy...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4245746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25466470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140032 |
_version_ | 1782346414518435840 |
---|---|
author | SAATCHI, Masoud SHOKRANEH, Ali NAVAEI, Hooman MARACY, Mohammad Reza SHOJAEI, Hasan |
author_facet | SAATCHI, Masoud SHOKRANEH, Ali NAVAEI, Hooman MARACY, Mohammad Reza SHOJAEI, Hasan |
author_sort | SAATCHI, Masoud |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is the most frequently isolated strain in failed endodontic therapy cases since it is resistant to calcium hydroxide (CH). Whether a combination of CH and chlorhexidine (CHX) is more effective than CH alone against E. faecalis is a matter of controversy. Thus, the aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A comprehensive search in PubMed, EMbase, EBSCOhost, The Cochrane Library, SciELO, and BBO databases, Clinical trials registers, Open Grey, and conference proceedings from the earliest available date to February 1, 2013 was carried out and the relevant articles were identified by two independent reviewers. Backward and forward search was performed and then inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The included studies were divided into "comparisons" according to the depth of sampling and dressing period of each medicament. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata software 10.0. The level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Eighty-five studies were retrieved from databases and backward/forward searches. Fortyfive studies were considered as relevant (5 in vivo, 18 in vitro, 18 ex vivo, and 4 review articles). Nine studies were included for meta-analysis. Inter-observer agreement (Cohen kappa) was 0.93. The included studies were divided into 21 comparisons for meta-analysis. Chi-square test showed the comparisons were heterogeneous (p<0.001). Random effect model demonstrated no significant difference between CH/CHX mixture and CH alone in their effect on E. faecalis (p=0.115). CONCLUSIONS: According to the evidence available now, mixing CH with CHX does not significantly increase the antimicrobial activity of CH against E. faecalis. It appears that mixing CH with CHX does not improve its ex vivo antibacterial property as an intracanal medicament against E. faecalis. Further in vivo studies are necessary to confirm and correlate the findings of this study with the clinical outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4245746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42457462014-12-01 Antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and meta-analysis SAATCHI, Masoud SHOKRANEH, Ali NAVAEI, Hooman MARACY, Mohammad Reza SHOJAEI, Hasan J Appl Oral Sci Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is the most frequently isolated strain in failed endodontic therapy cases since it is resistant to calcium hydroxide (CH). Whether a combination of CH and chlorhexidine (CHX) is more effective than CH alone against E. faecalis is a matter of controversy. Thus, the aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A comprehensive search in PubMed, EMbase, EBSCOhost, The Cochrane Library, SciELO, and BBO databases, Clinical trials registers, Open Grey, and conference proceedings from the earliest available date to February 1, 2013 was carried out and the relevant articles were identified by two independent reviewers. Backward and forward search was performed and then inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The included studies were divided into "comparisons" according to the depth of sampling and dressing period of each medicament. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata software 10.0. The level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Eighty-five studies were retrieved from databases and backward/forward searches. Fortyfive studies were considered as relevant (5 in vivo, 18 in vitro, 18 ex vivo, and 4 review articles). Nine studies were included for meta-analysis. Inter-observer agreement (Cohen kappa) was 0.93. The included studies were divided into 21 comparisons for meta-analysis. Chi-square test showed the comparisons were heterogeneous (p<0.001). Random effect model demonstrated no significant difference between CH/CHX mixture and CH alone in their effect on E. faecalis (p=0.115). CONCLUSIONS: According to the evidence available now, mixing CH with CHX does not significantly increase the antimicrobial activity of CH against E. faecalis. It appears that mixing CH with CHX does not improve its ex vivo antibacterial property as an intracanal medicament against E. faecalis. Further in vivo studies are necessary to confirm and correlate the findings of this study with the clinical outcomes. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4245746/ /pubmed/25466470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140032 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review SAATCHI, Masoud SHOKRANEH, Ali NAVAEI, Hooman MARACY, Mohammad Reza SHOJAEI, Hasan Antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on
Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and
meta-analysis |
title_full | Antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on
Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and
meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on
Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and
meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on
Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and
meta-analysis |
title_short | Antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on
Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and
meta-analysis |
title_sort | antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on
enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and
meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4245746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25466470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140032 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saatchimasoud antibacterialeffectofcalciumhydroxidecombinedwithchlorhexidineonenterococcusfaecalisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shokranehali antibacterialeffectofcalciumhydroxidecombinedwithchlorhexidineonenterococcusfaecalisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT navaeihooman antibacterialeffectofcalciumhydroxidecombinedwithchlorhexidineonenterococcusfaecalisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT maracymohammadreza antibacterialeffectofcalciumhydroxidecombinedwithchlorhexidineonenterococcusfaecalisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shojaeihasan antibacterialeffectofcalciumhydroxidecombinedwithchlorhexidineonenterococcusfaecalisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |