Cargando…

Antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is the most frequently isolated strain in failed endodontic therapy cases since it is resistant to calcium hydroxide (CH). Whether a combination of CH and chlorhexidine (CHX) is more effective than CH alone against E. faecalis is a matter of controversy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: SAATCHI, Masoud, SHOKRANEH, Ali, NAVAEI, Hooman, MARACY, Mohammad Reza, SHOJAEI, Hasan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4245746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25466470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140032
_version_ 1782346414518435840
author SAATCHI, Masoud
SHOKRANEH, Ali
NAVAEI, Hooman
MARACY, Mohammad Reza
SHOJAEI, Hasan
author_facet SAATCHI, Masoud
SHOKRANEH, Ali
NAVAEI, Hooman
MARACY, Mohammad Reza
SHOJAEI, Hasan
author_sort SAATCHI, Masoud
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is the most frequently isolated strain in failed endodontic therapy cases since it is resistant to calcium hydroxide (CH). Whether a combination of CH and chlorhexidine (CHX) is more effective than CH alone against E. faecalis is a matter of controversy. Thus, the aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A comprehensive search in PubMed, EMbase, EBSCOhost, The Cochrane Library, SciELO, and BBO databases, Clinical trials registers, Open Grey, and conference proceedings from the earliest available date to February 1, 2013 was carried out and the relevant articles were identified by two independent reviewers. Backward and forward search was performed and then inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The included studies were divided into "comparisons" according to the depth of sampling and dressing period of each medicament. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata software 10.0. The level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Eighty-five studies were retrieved from databases and backward/forward searches. Fortyfive studies were considered as relevant (5 in vivo, 18 in vitro, 18 ex vivo, and 4 review articles). Nine studies were included for meta-analysis. Inter-observer agreement (Cohen kappa) was 0.93. The included studies were divided into 21 comparisons for meta-analysis. Chi-square test showed the comparisons were heterogeneous (p<0.001). Random effect model demonstrated no significant difference between CH/CHX mixture and CH alone in their effect on E. faecalis (p=0.115). CONCLUSIONS: According to the evidence available now, mixing CH with CHX does not significantly increase the antimicrobial activity of CH against E. faecalis. It appears that mixing CH with CHX does not improve its ex vivo antibacterial property as an intracanal medicament against E. faecalis. Further in vivo studies are necessary to confirm and correlate the findings of this study with the clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4245746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42457462014-12-01 Antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and meta-analysis SAATCHI, Masoud SHOKRANEH, Ali NAVAEI, Hooman MARACY, Mohammad Reza SHOJAEI, Hasan J Appl Oral Sci Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is the most frequently isolated strain in failed endodontic therapy cases since it is resistant to calcium hydroxide (CH). Whether a combination of CH and chlorhexidine (CHX) is more effective than CH alone against E. faecalis is a matter of controversy. Thus, the aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A comprehensive search in PubMed, EMbase, EBSCOhost, The Cochrane Library, SciELO, and BBO databases, Clinical trials registers, Open Grey, and conference proceedings from the earliest available date to February 1, 2013 was carried out and the relevant articles were identified by two independent reviewers. Backward and forward search was performed and then inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The included studies were divided into "comparisons" according to the depth of sampling and dressing period of each medicament. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata software 10.0. The level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Eighty-five studies were retrieved from databases and backward/forward searches. Fortyfive studies were considered as relevant (5 in vivo, 18 in vitro, 18 ex vivo, and 4 review articles). Nine studies were included for meta-analysis. Inter-observer agreement (Cohen kappa) was 0.93. The included studies were divided into 21 comparisons for meta-analysis. Chi-square test showed the comparisons were heterogeneous (p<0.001). Random effect model demonstrated no significant difference between CH/CHX mixture and CH alone in their effect on E. faecalis (p=0.115). CONCLUSIONS: According to the evidence available now, mixing CH with CHX does not significantly increase the antimicrobial activity of CH against E. faecalis. It appears that mixing CH with CHX does not improve its ex vivo antibacterial property as an intracanal medicament against E. faecalis. Further in vivo studies are necessary to confirm and correlate the findings of this study with the clinical outcomes. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4245746/ /pubmed/25466470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140032 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
SAATCHI, Masoud
SHOKRANEH, Ali
NAVAEI, Hooman
MARACY, Mohammad Reza
SHOJAEI, Hasan
Antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine on enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4245746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25466470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140032
work_keys_str_mv AT saatchimasoud antibacterialeffectofcalciumhydroxidecombinedwithchlorhexidineonenterococcusfaecalisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shokranehali antibacterialeffectofcalciumhydroxidecombinedwithchlorhexidineonenterococcusfaecalisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT navaeihooman antibacterialeffectofcalciumhydroxidecombinedwithchlorhexidineonenterococcusfaecalisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maracymohammadreza antibacterialeffectofcalciumhydroxidecombinedwithchlorhexidineonenterococcusfaecalisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shojaeihasan antibacterialeffectofcalciumhydroxidecombinedwithchlorhexidineonenterococcusfaecalisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis