Cargando…

Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant-supported prosthesis – compression tests

OBJECTIVES: The complexity and heterogeneity of human bone, as well as ethical issues, most always hinder the performance of clinical trials. Thus, in vitro studies become an important source of information for the understanding of biomechanical events on implantsupported prostheses, although study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MORETTI NETO, Rafael Tobias, HIRAMATSU, Daniel Afonso, SUEDAM, Valdey, CONTI, Paulo César Rodrigues, RUBO, José Henrique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4245863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21437469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000100010
_version_ 1782346438418628608
author MORETTI NETO, Rafael Tobias
HIRAMATSU, Daniel Afonso
SUEDAM, Valdey
CONTI, Paulo César Rodrigues
RUBO, José Henrique
author_facet MORETTI NETO, Rafael Tobias
HIRAMATSU, Daniel Afonso
SUEDAM, Valdey
CONTI, Paulo César Rodrigues
RUBO, José Henrique
author_sort MORETTI NETO, Rafael Tobias
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The complexity and heterogeneity of human bone, as well as ethical issues, most always hinder the performance of clinical trials. Thus, in vitro studies become an important source of information for the understanding of biomechanical events on implantsupported prostheses, although study results cannot be considered reliable unless validation studies are conducted. The purpose of this work was to validate an artificial experimental model based on its modulus of elasticity, to simulate the performance of human bone in vivo in biomechanical studies of implant-supported prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, fast-curing polyurethane (F16 polyurethane, Axson) was used to build 40 specimens that were divided into five groups. The following reagent ratios (part A/part B) were used: Group A (0.5/1.0), Group B (0.8/1.0), Group C (1.0/1.0), Group D (1.2/1.0), and Group E (1.5/1.0). A universal testing machine (Kratos model K – 2000 MP) was used to measure modulus of elasticity values by compression. RESULTS: Mean modulus of elasticity values were: Group A – 389.72 MPa, Group B – 529.19 MPa, Group C – 571.11 MPa, Group D – 470.35 MPa, Group E – 437.36 MPa. CONCLUSION: The best mechanical characteristics and modulus of elasticity value comparable to that of human trabecular bone were obtained when A/B ratio was 1:1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4245863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42458632014-11-28 Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant-supported prosthesis – compression tests MORETTI NETO, Rafael Tobias HIRAMATSU, Daniel Afonso SUEDAM, Valdey CONTI, Paulo César Rodrigues RUBO, José Henrique J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The complexity and heterogeneity of human bone, as well as ethical issues, most always hinder the performance of clinical trials. Thus, in vitro studies become an important source of information for the understanding of biomechanical events on implantsupported prostheses, although study results cannot be considered reliable unless validation studies are conducted. The purpose of this work was to validate an artificial experimental model based on its modulus of elasticity, to simulate the performance of human bone in vivo in biomechanical studies of implant-supported prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, fast-curing polyurethane (F16 polyurethane, Axson) was used to build 40 specimens that were divided into five groups. The following reagent ratios (part A/part B) were used: Group A (0.5/1.0), Group B (0.8/1.0), Group C (1.0/1.0), Group D (1.2/1.0), and Group E (1.5/1.0). A universal testing machine (Kratos model K – 2000 MP) was used to measure modulus of elasticity values by compression. RESULTS: Mean modulus of elasticity values were: Group A – 389.72 MPa, Group B – 529.19 MPa, Group C – 571.11 MPa, Group D – 470.35 MPa, Group E – 437.36 MPa. CONCLUSION: The best mechanical characteristics and modulus of elasticity value comparable to that of human trabecular bone were obtained when A/B ratio was 1:1. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC4245863/ /pubmed/21437469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000100010 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
MORETTI NETO, Rafael Tobias
HIRAMATSU, Daniel Afonso
SUEDAM, Valdey
CONTI, Paulo César Rodrigues
RUBO, José Henrique
Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant-supported prosthesis – compression tests
title Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant-supported prosthesis – compression tests
title_full Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant-supported prosthesis – compression tests
title_fullStr Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant-supported prosthesis – compression tests
title_full_unstemmed Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant-supported prosthesis – compression tests
title_short Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant-supported prosthesis – compression tests
title_sort validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant-supported prosthesis – compression tests
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4245863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21437469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000100010
work_keys_str_mv AT morettinetorafaeltobias validationofanexperimentalpolyurethanemodelforbiomechanicalstudiesonimplantsupportedprosthesiscompressiontests
AT hiramatsudanielafonso validationofanexperimentalpolyurethanemodelforbiomechanicalstudiesonimplantsupportedprosthesiscompressiontests
AT suedamvaldey validationofanexperimentalpolyurethanemodelforbiomechanicalstudiesonimplantsupportedprosthesiscompressiontests
AT contipaulocesarrodrigues validationofanexperimentalpolyurethanemodelforbiomechanicalstudiesonimplantsupportedprosthesiscompressiontests
AT rubojosehenrique validationofanexperimentalpolyurethanemodelforbiomechanicalstudiesonimplantsupportedprosthesiscompressiontests