Cargando…
Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant-supported prosthesis – compression tests
OBJECTIVES: The complexity and heterogeneity of human bone, as well as ethical issues, most always hinder the performance of clinical trials. Thus, in vitro studies become an important source of information for the understanding of biomechanical events on implantsupported prostheses, although study...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4245863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21437469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000100010 |
_version_ | 1782346438418628608 |
---|---|
author | MORETTI NETO, Rafael Tobias HIRAMATSU, Daniel Afonso SUEDAM, Valdey CONTI, Paulo César Rodrigues RUBO, José Henrique |
author_facet | MORETTI NETO, Rafael Tobias HIRAMATSU, Daniel Afonso SUEDAM, Valdey CONTI, Paulo César Rodrigues RUBO, José Henrique |
author_sort | MORETTI NETO, Rafael Tobias |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The complexity and heterogeneity of human bone, as well as ethical issues, most always hinder the performance of clinical trials. Thus, in vitro studies become an important source of information for the understanding of biomechanical events on implantsupported prostheses, although study results cannot be considered reliable unless validation studies are conducted. The purpose of this work was to validate an artificial experimental model based on its modulus of elasticity, to simulate the performance of human bone in vivo in biomechanical studies of implant-supported prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, fast-curing polyurethane (F16 polyurethane, Axson) was used to build 40 specimens that were divided into five groups. The following reagent ratios (part A/part B) were used: Group A (0.5/1.0), Group B (0.8/1.0), Group C (1.0/1.0), Group D (1.2/1.0), and Group E (1.5/1.0). A universal testing machine (Kratos model K – 2000 MP) was used to measure modulus of elasticity values by compression. RESULTS: Mean modulus of elasticity values were: Group A – 389.72 MPa, Group B – 529.19 MPa, Group C – 571.11 MPa, Group D – 470.35 MPa, Group E – 437.36 MPa. CONCLUSION: The best mechanical characteristics and modulus of elasticity value comparable to that of human trabecular bone were obtained when A/B ratio was 1:1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4245863 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42458632014-11-28 Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant-supported prosthesis – compression tests MORETTI NETO, Rafael Tobias HIRAMATSU, Daniel Afonso SUEDAM, Valdey CONTI, Paulo César Rodrigues RUBO, José Henrique J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The complexity and heterogeneity of human bone, as well as ethical issues, most always hinder the performance of clinical trials. Thus, in vitro studies become an important source of information for the understanding of biomechanical events on implantsupported prostheses, although study results cannot be considered reliable unless validation studies are conducted. The purpose of this work was to validate an artificial experimental model based on its modulus of elasticity, to simulate the performance of human bone in vivo in biomechanical studies of implant-supported prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, fast-curing polyurethane (F16 polyurethane, Axson) was used to build 40 specimens that were divided into five groups. The following reagent ratios (part A/part B) were used: Group A (0.5/1.0), Group B (0.8/1.0), Group C (1.0/1.0), Group D (1.2/1.0), and Group E (1.5/1.0). A universal testing machine (Kratos model K – 2000 MP) was used to measure modulus of elasticity values by compression. RESULTS: Mean modulus of elasticity values were: Group A – 389.72 MPa, Group B – 529.19 MPa, Group C – 571.11 MPa, Group D – 470.35 MPa, Group E – 437.36 MPa. CONCLUSION: The best mechanical characteristics and modulus of elasticity value comparable to that of human trabecular bone were obtained when A/B ratio was 1:1. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC4245863/ /pubmed/21437469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000100010 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles MORETTI NETO, Rafael Tobias HIRAMATSU, Daniel Afonso SUEDAM, Valdey CONTI, Paulo César Rodrigues RUBO, José Henrique Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant-supported prosthesis – compression tests |
title | Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical
studies on implant-supported prosthesis – compression tests |
title_full | Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical
studies on implant-supported prosthesis – compression tests |
title_fullStr | Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical
studies on implant-supported prosthesis – compression tests |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical
studies on implant-supported prosthesis – compression tests |
title_short | Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical
studies on implant-supported prosthesis – compression tests |
title_sort | validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical
studies on implant-supported prosthesis – compression tests |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4245863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21437469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000100010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morettinetorafaeltobias validationofanexperimentalpolyurethanemodelforbiomechanicalstudiesonimplantsupportedprosthesiscompressiontests AT hiramatsudanielafonso validationofanexperimentalpolyurethanemodelforbiomechanicalstudiesonimplantsupportedprosthesiscompressiontests AT suedamvaldey validationofanexperimentalpolyurethanemodelforbiomechanicalstudiesonimplantsupportedprosthesiscompressiontests AT contipaulocesarrodrigues validationofanexperimentalpolyurethanemodelforbiomechanicalstudiesonimplantsupportedprosthesiscompressiontests AT rubojosehenrique validationofanexperimentalpolyurethanemodelforbiomechanicalstudiesonimplantsupportedprosthesiscompressiontests |