Cargando…

Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva – an in vitro evaluation

OBJECTIVE: The objective this work was to assess the friction coefficient between brackets and wires of different materials under conditions simulating the oral environment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Stainless steel (SS) and titanium-molybdenum alloy (TMA) wires of 0.019x0.025-in diameter (American Orth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: FIDALGO, Tatiana Kelly da Silva, PITHON, Matheus Melo, MACIEL, José Vinicius Bolognesi, BOLOGNESE, Ana Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4245865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21437471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000100012
_version_ 1782346438867419136
author FIDALGO, Tatiana Kelly da Silva
PITHON, Matheus Melo
MACIEL, José Vinicius Bolognesi
BOLOGNESE, Ana Maria
author_facet FIDALGO, Tatiana Kelly da Silva
PITHON, Matheus Melo
MACIEL, José Vinicius Bolognesi
BOLOGNESE, Ana Maria
author_sort FIDALGO, Tatiana Kelly da Silva
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective this work was to assess the friction coefficient between brackets and wires of different materials under conditions simulating the oral environment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Stainless steel (SS) and titanium-molybdenum alloy (TMA) wires of 0.019x0.025-in diameter (American Orthodontics) and polycarbonate bracket (American Orthodontics), ceramic bracket (American Orthodontics), and metal bracket (3M Unitek) with slots of 0.022x0.030-in were used. The friction coefficient was assessed by means of mechanical traction with the system immersed in artificial saliva. The mean roughness of both wire surface and bracket slots was evaluated by using a surface profilometer. RESULTS: The system using TMA wire and polycarbonate bracket had the highest roughness (p<0.05). SS wire with ceramic bracket had the highest friction coefficient, whereas the use of metallic bracket yielded the lowest (p<0.05). However, it was observed a statistically significant difference in the system using TMA wire and ceramic bracket compared to that using TMA wire and polycarbonate bracket (p=0.038). CONCLUSION: Ceramic brackets in association with SS wire should be judiciously used, since this system showed a high friction coefficient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4245865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42458652014-11-28 Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva – an in vitro evaluation FIDALGO, Tatiana Kelly da Silva PITHON, Matheus Melo MACIEL, José Vinicius Bolognesi BOLOGNESE, Ana Maria J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The objective this work was to assess the friction coefficient between brackets and wires of different materials under conditions simulating the oral environment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Stainless steel (SS) and titanium-molybdenum alloy (TMA) wires of 0.019x0.025-in diameter (American Orthodontics) and polycarbonate bracket (American Orthodontics), ceramic bracket (American Orthodontics), and metal bracket (3M Unitek) with slots of 0.022x0.030-in were used. The friction coefficient was assessed by means of mechanical traction with the system immersed in artificial saliva. The mean roughness of both wire surface and bracket slots was evaluated by using a surface profilometer. RESULTS: The system using TMA wire and polycarbonate bracket had the highest roughness (p<0.05). SS wire with ceramic bracket had the highest friction coefficient, whereas the use of metallic bracket yielded the lowest (p<0.05). However, it was observed a statistically significant difference in the system using TMA wire and ceramic bracket compared to that using TMA wire and polycarbonate bracket (p=0.038). CONCLUSION: Ceramic brackets in association with SS wire should be judiciously used, since this system showed a high friction coefficient. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC4245865/ /pubmed/21437471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000100012 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
FIDALGO, Tatiana Kelly da Silva
PITHON, Matheus Melo
MACIEL, José Vinicius Bolognesi
BOLOGNESE, Ana Maria
Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva – an in vitro evaluation
title Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva – an in vitro evaluation
title_full Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva – an in vitro evaluation
title_fullStr Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva – an in vitro evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva – an in vitro evaluation
title_short Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva – an in vitro evaluation
title_sort friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva – an in vitro evaluation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4245865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21437471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000100012
work_keys_str_mv AT fidalgotatianakellydasilva frictionbetweendifferentwirebracketcombinationsinartificialsalivaaninvitroevaluation
AT pithonmatheusmelo frictionbetweendifferentwirebracketcombinationsinartificialsalivaaninvitroevaluation
AT macieljoseviniciusbolognesi frictionbetweendifferentwirebracketcombinationsinartificialsalivaaninvitroevaluation
AT bologneseanamaria frictionbetweendifferentwirebracketcombinationsinartificialsalivaaninvitroevaluation