Cargando…

Binocular advantage for prehension movements performed in visually enriched environments requiring visual search

The purpose of this study was to examine the role of binocular vision during a prehension task performed in a visually enriched environment where the target object was surrounded by distractors/obstacles. Fifteen adults reached and grasped for a cylindrical peg while eye movements and upper limb kin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gnanaseelan, Roshani, Gonzalez, Dave A., Niechwiej-Szwedo, Ewa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4246685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25506323
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00959
_version_ 1782346566763282432
author Gnanaseelan, Roshani
Gonzalez, Dave A.
Niechwiej-Szwedo, Ewa
author_facet Gnanaseelan, Roshani
Gonzalez, Dave A.
Niechwiej-Szwedo, Ewa
author_sort Gnanaseelan, Roshani
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to examine the role of binocular vision during a prehension task performed in a visually enriched environment where the target object was surrounded by distractors/obstacles. Fifteen adults reached and grasped for a cylindrical peg while eye movements and upper limb kinematics were recorded. The complexity of the visual environment was manipulated by varying the number of distractors and by varying the saliency of the target. Gaze behavior (i.e., the latency of the primary gaze shift and frequency of gaze shifts prior to reach initiation) was comparable between viewing conditions. In contrast, a binocular advantage was evident in performance accuracy. Specifically, participants picked up the wrong object twice as often during monocular viewing when the complexity of the environment increased. Reach performance was more efficient during binocular viewing, which was demonstrated by shorter reach reaction time and overall movement time. Reaching movements during the approach phase had higher peak velocity during binocular viewing. During monocular viewing reach trajectories exhibited a direction bias during the acceleration phase, which was leftward during left eye viewing and rightward during right eye viewing. This bias can be explained by the presence of esophoria in the covered eye. The grasping interval was also extended by ~20% during monocular viewing; however, the duration of the return phase after the target was picked up was comparable across viewing conditions. In conclusion, binocular vision provides important input for planning and execution of prehension movements in visually enriched environments. Binocular advantage was evident, regardless of set size or target saliency, indicating that adults plan their movements more cautiously during monocular viewing, even in relatively simple environments with a highly salient target. Nevertheless, in visually-normal adults monocular input provides sufficient information to engage in online control to correct the initial errors in movement planning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4246685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42466852014-12-12 Binocular advantage for prehension movements performed in visually enriched environments requiring visual search Gnanaseelan, Roshani Gonzalez, Dave A. Niechwiej-Szwedo, Ewa Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The purpose of this study was to examine the role of binocular vision during a prehension task performed in a visually enriched environment where the target object was surrounded by distractors/obstacles. Fifteen adults reached and grasped for a cylindrical peg while eye movements and upper limb kinematics were recorded. The complexity of the visual environment was manipulated by varying the number of distractors and by varying the saliency of the target. Gaze behavior (i.e., the latency of the primary gaze shift and frequency of gaze shifts prior to reach initiation) was comparable between viewing conditions. In contrast, a binocular advantage was evident in performance accuracy. Specifically, participants picked up the wrong object twice as often during monocular viewing when the complexity of the environment increased. Reach performance was more efficient during binocular viewing, which was demonstrated by shorter reach reaction time and overall movement time. Reaching movements during the approach phase had higher peak velocity during binocular viewing. During monocular viewing reach trajectories exhibited a direction bias during the acceleration phase, which was leftward during left eye viewing and rightward during right eye viewing. This bias can be explained by the presence of esophoria in the covered eye. The grasping interval was also extended by ~20% during monocular viewing; however, the duration of the return phase after the target was picked up was comparable across viewing conditions. In conclusion, binocular vision provides important input for planning and execution of prehension movements in visually enriched environments. Binocular advantage was evident, regardless of set size or target saliency, indicating that adults plan their movements more cautiously during monocular viewing, even in relatively simple environments with a highly salient target. Nevertheless, in visually-normal adults monocular input provides sufficient information to engage in online control to correct the initial errors in movement planning. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4246685/ /pubmed/25506323 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00959 Text en Copyright © 2014 Gnanaseelan, Gonzalez and Niechwiej-Szwedo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Gnanaseelan, Roshani
Gonzalez, Dave A.
Niechwiej-Szwedo, Ewa
Binocular advantage for prehension movements performed in visually enriched environments requiring visual search
title Binocular advantage for prehension movements performed in visually enriched environments requiring visual search
title_full Binocular advantage for prehension movements performed in visually enriched environments requiring visual search
title_fullStr Binocular advantage for prehension movements performed in visually enriched environments requiring visual search
title_full_unstemmed Binocular advantage for prehension movements performed in visually enriched environments requiring visual search
title_short Binocular advantage for prehension movements performed in visually enriched environments requiring visual search
title_sort binocular advantage for prehension movements performed in visually enriched environments requiring visual search
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4246685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25506323
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00959
work_keys_str_mv AT gnanaseelanroshani binocularadvantageforprehensionmovementsperformedinvisuallyenrichedenvironmentsrequiringvisualsearch
AT gonzalezdavea binocularadvantageforprehensionmovementsperformedinvisuallyenrichedenvironmentsrequiringvisualsearch
AT niechwiejszwedoewa binocularadvantageforprehensionmovementsperformedinvisuallyenrichedenvironmentsrequiringvisualsearch