Cargando…

Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement

INTRODUCTION: Surgical replacement for aortic stenosis is fraught with complications in high-risk patients. Transcatheter techniques may offer a minimally invasive solution, but their comparative effectiveness and safety is uncertain. We performed a network meta-analysis on this topic. METHODS: Rand...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biondi-Zoccai, G, Peruzzi, M, Abbate, A, Gertz, Z M, Benedetto, U, Tonelli, E, D'Ascenzo, F, Giordano, A, Agostoni, P, Frati, G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: EDIMES Edizioni Internazionali Srl 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4246842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25436205
_version_ 1782346572151914496
author Biondi-Zoccai, G
Peruzzi, M
Abbate, A
Gertz, Z M
Benedetto, U
Tonelli, E
D'Ascenzo, F
Giordano, A
Agostoni, P
Frati, G
author_facet Biondi-Zoccai, G
Peruzzi, M
Abbate, A
Gertz, Z M
Benedetto, U
Tonelli, E
D'Ascenzo, F
Giordano, A
Agostoni, P
Frati, G
author_sort Biondi-Zoccai, G
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Surgical replacement for aortic stenosis is fraught with complications in high-risk patients. Transcatheter techniques may offer a minimally invasive solution, but their comparative effectiveness and safety is uncertain. We performed a network meta-analysis on this topic. METHODS: Randomized trials on transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs surgery were searched. The primary outcome was all cause death. Risk estimates were obtained with Bayesian network meta-analytic methods. RESULTS: Four trials with 1,805 patients were included. After a median of 8 months, risk of death and myocardial infarction was not different when comparing surgery versus transcatheter procedures, irrespective of device or access. Conversely, surgery was associated with higher rates of major bleeding (odds ratio vs CoreValve=3.03 [95% credible interval: 2.23-4.17]; odds ratio vs transfemoral Sapien =1.82 [1.21-2.70]; odds ratio vs transapical Sapien =2.08 [1.20-3.70]), and acute kidney injury (odds ratio vs CoreValve =2.08 [1.33-3.32]; odds ratio vs transapical Sapien =2.78 [2.21-99.80]), but lower rates of pacemaker implantation (odds ratio vs CoreValve =0.41 [0.28-0.59]), and moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (odds ratio vs CoreValve =0.06 [0.02-0.27]; odds ratio vs Sapien=0.17 [0.02-0.76]). Strokes were less frequent with CoreValve than with transfemoral Sapien (odds ratio =0.32 [0.13-0.73]) or transapical Sapien (odds ratio =0.33 [0.10-0.93]), whereas pacemaker implantation was more common with CoreValve (odds ratio vs surgery =2.46 [1.69-3.61]; odds ratio vs transfemoral Sapien =2.22 [1.27-3.85]). CONCLUSIONS: Survival after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement is similar, but there might be differences in the individual safety and effectiveness profile between the treatment strategies and the individual devices used in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4246842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher EDIMES Edizioni Internazionali Srl
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42468422014-11-28 Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement Biondi-Zoccai, G Peruzzi, M Abbate, A Gertz, Z M Benedetto, U Tonelli, E D'Ascenzo, F Giordano, A Agostoni, P Frati, G Heart Lung Vessel Research-Article INTRODUCTION: Surgical replacement for aortic stenosis is fraught with complications in high-risk patients. Transcatheter techniques may offer a minimally invasive solution, but their comparative effectiveness and safety is uncertain. We performed a network meta-analysis on this topic. METHODS: Randomized trials on transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs surgery were searched. The primary outcome was all cause death. Risk estimates were obtained with Bayesian network meta-analytic methods. RESULTS: Four trials with 1,805 patients were included. After a median of 8 months, risk of death and myocardial infarction was not different when comparing surgery versus transcatheter procedures, irrespective of device or access. Conversely, surgery was associated with higher rates of major bleeding (odds ratio vs CoreValve=3.03 [95% credible interval: 2.23-4.17]; odds ratio vs transfemoral Sapien =1.82 [1.21-2.70]; odds ratio vs transapical Sapien =2.08 [1.20-3.70]), and acute kidney injury (odds ratio vs CoreValve =2.08 [1.33-3.32]; odds ratio vs transapical Sapien =2.78 [2.21-99.80]), but lower rates of pacemaker implantation (odds ratio vs CoreValve =0.41 [0.28-0.59]), and moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (odds ratio vs CoreValve =0.06 [0.02-0.27]; odds ratio vs Sapien=0.17 [0.02-0.76]). Strokes were less frequent with CoreValve than with transfemoral Sapien (odds ratio =0.32 [0.13-0.73]) or transapical Sapien (odds ratio =0.33 [0.10-0.93]), whereas pacemaker implantation was more common with CoreValve (odds ratio vs surgery =2.46 [1.69-3.61]; odds ratio vs transfemoral Sapien =2.22 [1.27-3.85]). CONCLUSIONS: Survival after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement is similar, but there might be differences in the individual safety and effectiveness profile between the treatment strategies and the individual devices used in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EDIMES Edizioni Internazionali Srl 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4246842/ /pubmed/25436205 Text en Copyright © 2014, Heart, Lung and Vessels http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research-Article
Biondi-Zoccai, G
Peruzzi, M
Abbate, A
Gertz, Z M
Benedetto, U
Tonelli, E
D'Ascenzo, F
Giordano, A
Agostoni, P
Frati, G
Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement
title Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement
title_full Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement
title_fullStr Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement
title_full_unstemmed Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement
title_short Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement
title_sort network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with corevalve or sapien devices versus surgical replacement
topic Research-Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4246842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25436205
work_keys_str_mv AT biondizoccaig networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement
AT peruzzim networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement
AT abbatea networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement
AT gertzzm networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement
AT benedettou networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement
AT tonellie networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement
AT dascenzof networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement
AT giordanoa networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement
AT agostonip networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement
AT fratig networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement