Cargando…
Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement
INTRODUCTION: Surgical replacement for aortic stenosis is fraught with complications in high-risk patients. Transcatheter techniques may offer a minimally invasive solution, but their comparative effectiveness and safety is uncertain. We performed a network meta-analysis on this topic. METHODS: Rand...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
EDIMES Edizioni Internazionali Srl
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4246842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25436205 |
_version_ | 1782346572151914496 |
---|---|
author | Biondi-Zoccai, G Peruzzi, M Abbate, A Gertz, Z M Benedetto, U Tonelli, E D'Ascenzo, F Giordano, A Agostoni, P Frati, G |
author_facet | Biondi-Zoccai, G Peruzzi, M Abbate, A Gertz, Z M Benedetto, U Tonelli, E D'Ascenzo, F Giordano, A Agostoni, P Frati, G |
author_sort | Biondi-Zoccai, G |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Surgical replacement for aortic stenosis is fraught with complications in high-risk patients. Transcatheter techniques may offer a minimally invasive solution, but their comparative effectiveness and safety is uncertain. We performed a network meta-analysis on this topic. METHODS: Randomized trials on transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs surgery were searched. The primary outcome was all cause death. Risk estimates were obtained with Bayesian network meta-analytic methods. RESULTS: Four trials with 1,805 patients were included. After a median of 8 months, risk of death and myocardial infarction was not different when comparing surgery versus transcatheter procedures, irrespective of device or access. Conversely, surgery was associated with higher rates of major bleeding (odds ratio vs CoreValve=3.03 [95% credible interval: 2.23-4.17]; odds ratio vs transfemoral Sapien =1.82 [1.21-2.70]; odds ratio vs transapical Sapien =2.08 [1.20-3.70]), and acute kidney injury (odds ratio vs CoreValve =2.08 [1.33-3.32]; odds ratio vs transapical Sapien =2.78 [2.21-99.80]), but lower rates of pacemaker implantation (odds ratio vs CoreValve =0.41 [0.28-0.59]), and moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (odds ratio vs CoreValve =0.06 [0.02-0.27]; odds ratio vs Sapien=0.17 [0.02-0.76]). Strokes were less frequent with CoreValve than with transfemoral Sapien (odds ratio =0.32 [0.13-0.73]) or transapical Sapien (odds ratio =0.33 [0.10-0.93]), whereas pacemaker implantation was more common with CoreValve (odds ratio vs surgery =2.46 [1.69-3.61]; odds ratio vs transfemoral Sapien =2.22 [1.27-3.85]). CONCLUSIONS: Survival after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement is similar, but there might be differences in the individual safety and effectiveness profile between the treatment strategies and the individual devices used in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4246842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | EDIMES Edizioni Internazionali Srl |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42468422014-11-28 Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement Biondi-Zoccai, G Peruzzi, M Abbate, A Gertz, Z M Benedetto, U Tonelli, E D'Ascenzo, F Giordano, A Agostoni, P Frati, G Heart Lung Vessel Research-Article INTRODUCTION: Surgical replacement for aortic stenosis is fraught with complications in high-risk patients. Transcatheter techniques may offer a minimally invasive solution, but their comparative effectiveness and safety is uncertain. We performed a network meta-analysis on this topic. METHODS: Randomized trials on transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs surgery were searched. The primary outcome was all cause death. Risk estimates were obtained with Bayesian network meta-analytic methods. RESULTS: Four trials with 1,805 patients were included. After a median of 8 months, risk of death and myocardial infarction was not different when comparing surgery versus transcatheter procedures, irrespective of device or access. Conversely, surgery was associated with higher rates of major bleeding (odds ratio vs CoreValve=3.03 [95% credible interval: 2.23-4.17]; odds ratio vs transfemoral Sapien =1.82 [1.21-2.70]; odds ratio vs transapical Sapien =2.08 [1.20-3.70]), and acute kidney injury (odds ratio vs CoreValve =2.08 [1.33-3.32]; odds ratio vs transapical Sapien =2.78 [2.21-99.80]), but lower rates of pacemaker implantation (odds ratio vs CoreValve =0.41 [0.28-0.59]), and moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (odds ratio vs CoreValve =0.06 [0.02-0.27]; odds ratio vs Sapien=0.17 [0.02-0.76]). Strokes were less frequent with CoreValve than with transfemoral Sapien (odds ratio =0.32 [0.13-0.73]) or transapical Sapien (odds ratio =0.33 [0.10-0.93]), whereas pacemaker implantation was more common with CoreValve (odds ratio vs surgery =2.46 [1.69-3.61]; odds ratio vs transfemoral Sapien =2.22 [1.27-3.85]). CONCLUSIONS: Survival after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement is similar, but there might be differences in the individual safety and effectiveness profile between the treatment strategies and the individual devices used in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EDIMES Edizioni Internazionali Srl 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4246842/ /pubmed/25436205 Text en Copyright © 2014, Heart, Lung and Vessels http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research-Article Biondi-Zoccai, G Peruzzi, M Abbate, A Gertz, Z M Benedetto, U Tonelli, E D'Ascenzo, F Giordano, A Agostoni, P Frati, G Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement |
title | Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement |
title_full | Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement |
title_fullStr | Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement |
title_full_unstemmed | Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement |
title_short | Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement |
title_sort | network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with corevalve or sapien devices versus surgical replacement |
topic | Research-Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4246842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25436205 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biondizoccaig networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement AT peruzzim networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement AT abbatea networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement AT gertzzm networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement AT benedettou networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement AT tonellie networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement AT dascenzof networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement AT giordanoa networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement AT agostonip networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement AT fratig networkmetaanalysisonthecomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithcorevalveorsapiendevicesversussurgicalreplacement |