Cargando…

Efficacy of long-term milnacipran treatment in patients meeting different thresholds of clinically relevant pain relief: subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study

BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia patients from a long-term, open-label study of milnacipran (50–200 mg/day) were eligible to participate in a 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled withdrawal study. The withdrawal study evaluated loss of therapeutic response in patients who achieved ≥50% pain improvements...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mease, Philip J, Clauw, Daniel J, Trugman, Joel M, Palmer, Robert H, Wang, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4247140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25473309
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S70200
_version_ 1782346594664841216
author Mease, Philip J
Clauw, Daniel J
Trugman, Joel M
Palmer, Robert H
Wang, Yong
author_facet Mease, Philip J
Clauw, Daniel J
Trugman, Joel M
Palmer, Robert H
Wang, Yong
author_sort Mease, Philip J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia patients from a long-term, open-label study of milnacipran (50–200 mg/day) were eligible to participate in a 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled withdrawal study. The withdrawal study evaluated loss of therapeutic response in patients who achieved ≥50% pain improvements after receiving up to 3.25 years of milnacipran. This post-hoc analysis investigated whether patients who met lower thresholds of pain improvement also experienced worsening of fibromyalgia symptoms upon treatment withdrawal. METHOD: Among patients who received milnacipran ≥100 mg/day during the long-term study, three subgroups were identified based on percentage of pain reduction at randomization: ≥50% (protocol-defined “responders”; n=150); ≥30% to <50% (patients with clinically meaningful pain improvement; n=61); and <30% (n=110). Efficacy assessments included the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-Revised (FIQR), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). RESULTS: In the ≥30 to <50% subgroup, significant worsening in pain was detected after treatment withdrawal. The difference between placebo and milnacipran in mean VAS score changes for this subgroup (+9.0, P<0.05) was similar to the difference in protocol-defined responders (+9.4, P<0.05). In the <30% subgroup, no worsening in pain was observed in either treatment arm. However, patients in this subgroup experienced significant worsening in FIQR scores after treatment withdrawal (placebo, +6.9; milnacipran, −2.8; P<0.001), as well as worsening in SF-36 PCS and BDI scores. CONCLUSION: Patients who experienced ≥30% to <50% pain reduction with long-term milnacipran had significant worsening of fibromyalgia symptoms after treatment withdrawal. These results suggest that the conventional ≥30% pain responder cutoff may be adequate to demonstrate efficacy in randomized withdrawal studies of fibromyalgia. Patients in the <30% pain reduction subgroup had worsening scores on the FIQR and other multidimensional measures after treatment withdrawal, indicating the importance of identifying and managing the multiple symptoms of fibromyalgia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4247140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42471402014-12-03 Efficacy of long-term milnacipran treatment in patients meeting different thresholds of clinically relevant pain relief: subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study Mease, Philip J Clauw, Daniel J Trugman, Joel M Palmer, Robert H Wang, Yong J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia patients from a long-term, open-label study of milnacipran (50–200 mg/day) were eligible to participate in a 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled withdrawal study. The withdrawal study evaluated loss of therapeutic response in patients who achieved ≥50% pain improvements after receiving up to 3.25 years of milnacipran. This post-hoc analysis investigated whether patients who met lower thresholds of pain improvement also experienced worsening of fibromyalgia symptoms upon treatment withdrawal. METHOD: Among patients who received milnacipran ≥100 mg/day during the long-term study, three subgroups were identified based on percentage of pain reduction at randomization: ≥50% (protocol-defined “responders”; n=150); ≥30% to <50% (patients with clinically meaningful pain improvement; n=61); and <30% (n=110). Efficacy assessments included the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-Revised (FIQR), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). RESULTS: In the ≥30 to <50% subgroup, significant worsening in pain was detected after treatment withdrawal. The difference between placebo and milnacipran in mean VAS score changes for this subgroup (+9.0, P<0.05) was similar to the difference in protocol-defined responders (+9.4, P<0.05). In the <30% subgroup, no worsening in pain was observed in either treatment arm. However, patients in this subgroup experienced significant worsening in FIQR scores after treatment withdrawal (placebo, +6.9; milnacipran, −2.8; P<0.001), as well as worsening in SF-36 PCS and BDI scores. CONCLUSION: Patients who experienced ≥30% to <50% pain reduction with long-term milnacipran had significant worsening of fibromyalgia symptoms after treatment withdrawal. These results suggest that the conventional ≥30% pain responder cutoff may be adequate to demonstrate efficacy in randomized withdrawal studies of fibromyalgia. Patients in the <30% pain reduction subgroup had worsening scores on the FIQR and other multidimensional measures after treatment withdrawal, indicating the importance of identifying and managing the multiple symptoms of fibromyalgia. Dove Medical Press 2014-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4247140/ /pubmed/25473309 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S70200 Text en © 2014 Mease et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mease, Philip J
Clauw, Daniel J
Trugman, Joel M
Palmer, Robert H
Wang, Yong
Efficacy of long-term milnacipran treatment in patients meeting different thresholds of clinically relevant pain relief: subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study
title Efficacy of long-term milnacipran treatment in patients meeting different thresholds of clinically relevant pain relief: subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study
title_full Efficacy of long-term milnacipran treatment in patients meeting different thresholds of clinically relevant pain relief: subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study
title_fullStr Efficacy of long-term milnacipran treatment in patients meeting different thresholds of clinically relevant pain relief: subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of long-term milnacipran treatment in patients meeting different thresholds of clinically relevant pain relief: subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study
title_short Efficacy of long-term milnacipran treatment in patients meeting different thresholds of clinically relevant pain relief: subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study
title_sort efficacy of long-term milnacipran treatment in patients meeting different thresholds of clinically relevant pain relief: subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4247140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25473309
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S70200
work_keys_str_mv AT measephilipj efficacyoflongtermmilnaciprantreatmentinpatientsmeetingdifferentthresholdsofclinicallyrelevantpainreliefsubgroupanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledwithdrawalstudy
AT clauwdanielj efficacyoflongtermmilnaciprantreatmentinpatientsmeetingdifferentthresholdsofclinicallyrelevantpainreliefsubgroupanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledwithdrawalstudy
AT trugmanjoelm efficacyoflongtermmilnaciprantreatmentinpatientsmeetingdifferentthresholdsofclinicallyrelevantpainreliefsubgroupanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledwithdrawalstudy
AT palmerroberth efficacyoflongtermmilnaciprantreatmentinpatientsmeetingdifferentthresholdsofclinicallyrelevantpainreliefsubgroupanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledwithdrawalstudy
AT wangyong efficacyoflongtermmilnaciprantreatmentinpatientsmeetingdifferentthresholdsofclinicallyrelevantpainreliefsubgroupanalysisofarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledwithdrawalstudy