Cargando…

Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience

The continuing development of robotic surgery supports its use in laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. Our study retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcome and patient’s satisfaction of gastrointestinal laparoscopic robotic procedures. From January 2003 to September 2007, 94 patients (27 women,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soravia, Claudio, Schwieger, Ian, Witzig, Jacques-Alain, Wassmer, Frank-Alain, Vedrenne, Thierry, Sutter, Pierre, Dufour, Jean-Philippe, Racloz, Yves
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4247419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25484980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0058-2
_version_ 1782346632197570560
author Soravia, Claudio
Schwieger, Ian
Witzig, Jacques-Alain
Wassmer, Frank-Alain
Vedrenne, Thierry
Sutter, Pierre
Dufour, Jean-Philippe
Racloz, Yves
author_facet Soravia, Claudio
Schwieger, Ian
Witzig, Jacques-Alain
Wassmer, Frank-Alain
Vedrenne, Thierry
Sutter, Pierre
Dufour, Jean-Philippe
Racloz, Yves
author_sort Soravia, Claudio
collection PubMed
description The continuing development of robotic surgery supports its use in laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. Our study retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcome and patient’s satisfaction of gastrointestinal laparoscopic robotic procedures. From January 2003 to September 2007, 94 patients (27 women, 67 men) with a mean age of 53 years (range 19–84 years) underwent laparoscopic surgery with a da Vinci robotic system. There were 40 colorectal cases (43%), 31 anti-reflux surgery cases (33%) and 14 obesity surgery cases (15%); the remaining cases consisted of gastric and gallbladder surgery, intra-abdominal tumour excisions, and hepatic cyst resections. The majority of the cases (88, 94%) were performed for benign disease. The mean operative time was 153 min (range 60–330 min). One patient needed a blood transfusion. The mean body mass index was 25 (range 16–47). No death occurred. Five cases (5.3%) were converted to conventional laparoscopic surgery (n = 3) or to laparotomy (n = 2). Morbidity consisted of one Nissen redo surgery to loosen a tight anti-reflux valve 6 days after robotic surgery, a robotic left ureter repair and pelvic haemorrhage following proctectomy requiring re-operation to control haemostasis and to remove pelvic haematoma. Mean follow-up time was 11 months (range 15 days to 34 months). One case of incisional trocar hernia needed re-operation. Overall patient’s satisfaction was high: few scars were cheloïd, while functional surgical outcome was rated high by most of the patients. Our preliminary experience was encouraging, with minimal morbidity and very high acceptance by patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4247419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42474192014-12-03 Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience Soravia, Claudio Schwieger, Ian Witzig, Jacques-Alain Wassmer, Frank-Alain Vedrenne, Thierry Sutter, Pierre Dufour, Jean-Philippe Racloz, Yves J Robot Surg Original Article The continuing development of robotic surgery supports its use in laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. Our study retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcome and patient’s satisfaction of gastrointestinal laparoscopic robotic procedures. From January 2003 to September 2007, 94 patients (27 women, 67 men) with a mean age of 53 years (range 19–84 years) underwent laparoscopic surgery with a da Vinci robotic system. There were 40 colorectal cases (43%), 31 anti-reflux surgery cases (33%) and 14 obesity surgery cases (15%); the remaining cases consisted of gastric and gallbladder surgery, intra-abdominal tumour excisions, and hepatic cyst resections. The majority of the cases (88, 94%) were performed for benign disease. The mean operative time was 153 min (range 60–330 min). One patient needed a blood transfusion. The mean body mass index was 25 (range 16–47). No death occurred. Five cases (5.3%) were converted to conventional laparoscopic surgery (n = 3) or to laparotomy (n = 2). Morbidity consisted of one Nissen redo surgery to loosen a tight anti-reflux valve 6 days after robotic surgery, a robotic left ureter repair and pelvic haemorrhage following proctectomy requiring re-operation to control haemostasis and to remove pelvic haematoma. Mean follow-up time was 11 months (range 15 days to 34 months). One case of incisional trocar hernia needed re-operation. Overall patient’s satisfaction was high: few scars were cheloïd, while functional surgical outcome was rated high by most of the patients. Our preliminary experience was encouraging, with minimal morbidity and very high acceptance by patients. Springer-Verlag 2008-01-04 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC4247419/ /pubmed/25484980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0058-2 Text en © Springer London 2007
spellingShingle Original Article
Soravia, Claudio
Schwieger, Ian
Witzig, Jacques-Alain
Wassmer, Frank-Alain
Vedrenne, Thierry
Sutter, Pierre
Dufour, Jean-Philippe
Racloz, Yves
Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience
title Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience
title_full Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience
title_fullStr Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience
title_short Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience
title_sort laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the geneva experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4247419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25484980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0058-2
work_keys_str_mv AT soraviaclaudio laparoscopicroboticassistedgastrointestinalsurgerythegenevaexperience
AT schwiegerian laparoscopicroboticassistedgastrointestinalsurgerythegenevaexperience
AT witzigjacquesalain laparoscopicroboticassistedgastrointestinalsurgerythegenevaexperience
AT wassmerfrankalain laparoscopicroboticassistedgastrointestinalsurgerythegenevaexperience
AT vedrennethierry laparoscopicroboticassistedgastrointestinalsurgerythegenevaexperience
AT sutterpierre laparoscopicroboticassistedgastrointestinalsurgerythegenevaexperience
AT dufourjeanphilippe laparoscopicroboticassistedgastrointestinalsurgerythegenevaexperience
AT raclozyves laparoscopicroboticassistedgastrointestinalsurgerythegenevaexperience