Cargando…
Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience
The continuing development of robotic surgery supports its use in laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. Our study retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcome and patient’s satisfaction of gastrointestinal laparoscopic robotic procedures. From January 2003 to September 2007, 94 patients (27 women,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4247419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25484980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0058-2 |
_version_ | 1782346632197570560 |
---|---|
author | Soravia, Claudio Schwieger, Ian Witzig, Jacques-Alain Wassmer, Frank-Alain Vedrenne, Thierry Sutter, Pierre Dufour, Jean-Philippe Racloz, Yves |
author_facet | Soravia, Claudio Schwieger, Ian Witzig, Jacques-Alain Wassmer, Frank-Alain Vedrenne, Thierry Sutter, Pierre Dufour, Jean-Philippe Racloz, Yves |
author_sort | Soravia, Claudio |
collection | PubMed |
description | The continuing development of robotic surgery supports its use in laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. Our study retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcome and patient’s satisfaction of gastrointestinal laparoscopic robotic procedures. From January 2003 to September 2007, 94 patients (27 women, 67 men) with a mean age of 53 years (range 19–84 years) underwent laparoscopic surgery with a da Vinci robotic system. There were 40 colorectal cases (43%), 31 anti-reflux surgery cases (33%) and 14 obesity surgery cases (15%); the remaining cases consisted of gastric and gallbladder surgery, intra-abdominal tumour excisions, and hepatic cyst resections. The majority of the cases (88, 94%) were performed for benign disease. The mean operative time was 153 min (range 60–330 min). One patient needed a blood transfusion. The mean body mass index was 25 (range 16–47). No death occurred. Five cases (5.3%) were converted to conventional laparoscopic surgery (n = 3) or to laparotomy (n = 2). Morbidity consisted of one Nissen redo surgery to loosen a tight anti-reflux valve 6 days after robotic surgery, a robotic left ureter repair and pelvic haemorrhage following proctectomy requiring re-operation to control haemostasis and to remove pelvic haematoma. Mean follow-up time was 11 months (range 15 days to 34 months). One case of incisional trocar hernia needed re-operation. Overall patient’s satisfaction was high: few scars were cheloïd, while functional surgical outcome was rated high by most of the patients. Our preliminary experience was encouraging, with minimal morbidity and very high acceptance by patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4247419 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42474192014-12-03 Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience Soravia, Claudio Schwieger, Ian Witzig, Jacques-Alain Wassmer, Frank-Alain Vedrenne, Thierry Sutter, Pierre Dufour, Jean-Philippe Racloz, Yves J Robot Surg Original Article The continuing development of robotic surgery supports its use in laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. Our study retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcome and patient’s satisfaction of gastrointestinal laparoscopic robotic procedures. From January 2003 to September 2007, 94 patients (27 women, 67 men) with a mean age of 53 years (range 19–84 years) underwent laparoscopic surgery with a da Vinci robotic system. There were 40 colorectal cases (43%), 31 anti-reflux surgery cases (33%) and 14 obesity surgery cases (15%); the remaining cases consisted of gastric and gallbladder surgery, intra-abdominal tumour excisions, and hepatic cyst resections. The majority of the cases (88, 94%) were performed for benign disease. The mean operative time was 153 min (range 60–330 min). One patient needed a blood transfusion. The mean body mass index was 25 (range 16–47). No death occurred. Five cases (5.3%) were converted to conventional laparoscopic surgery (n = 3) or to laparotomy (n = 2). Morbidity consisted of one Nissen redo surgery to loosen a tight anti-reflux valve 6 days after robotic surgery, a robotic left ureter repair and pelvic haemorrhage following proctectomy requiring re-operation to control haemostasis and to remove pelvic haematoma. Mean follow-up time was 11 months (range 15 days to 34 months). One case of incisional trocar hernia needed re-operation. Overall patient’s satisfaction was high: few scars were cheloïd, while functional surgical outcome was rated high by most of the patients. Our preliminary experience was encouraging, with minimal morbidity and very high acceptance by patients. Springer-Verlag 2008-01-04 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC4247419/ /pubmed/25484980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0058-2 Text en © Springer London 2007 |
spellingShingle | Original Article Soravia, Claudio Schwieger, Ian Witzig, Jacques-Alain Wassmer, Frank-Alain Vedrenne, Thierry Sutter, Pierre Dufour, Jean-Philippe Racloz, Yves Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience |
title | Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience |
title_full | Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience |
title_short | Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience |
title_sort | laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the geneva experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4247419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25484980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0058-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soraviaclaudio laparoscopicroboticassistedgastrointestinalsurgerythegenevaexperience AT schwiegerian laparoscopicroboticassistedgastrointestinalsurgerythegenevaexperience AT witzigjacquesalain laparoscopicroboticassistedgastrointestinalsurgerythegenevaexperience AT wassmerfrankalain laparoscopicroboticassistedgastrointestinalsurgerythegenevaexperience AT vedrennethierry laparoscopicroboticassistedgastrointestinalsurgerythegenevaexperience AT sutterpierre laparoscopicroboticassistedgastrointestinalsurgerythegenevaexperience AT dufourjeanphilippe laparoscopicroboticassistedgastrointestinalsurgerythegenevaexperience AT raclozyves laparoscopicroboticassistedgastrointestinalsurgerythegenevaexperience |