Cargando…

Age-stratified outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

We sought to evaluate post-operative return of urinary and sexual function in men undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP). Prospective assessment of urinary continence and sexual function was performed in patients undergoing RLRP. Subjective assessment involved the use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zorn, Kevin C., Mendiola, Frederick P., Rapp, David E., Mikhail, Albert A., Lin, Shang, Orvieto, Marcelo A., Zagaja, Gregory P., Shalhav, Arieh L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4247449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25484948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0009-y
_version_ 1782346639121317888
author Zorn, Kevin C.
Mendiola, Frederick P.
Rapp, David E.
Mikhail, Albert A.
Lin, Shang
Orvieto, Marcelo A.
Zagaja, Gregory P.
Shalhav, Arieh L.
author_facet Zorn, Kevin C.
Mendiola, Frederick P.
Rapp, David E.
Mikhail, Albert A.
Lin, Shang
Orvieto, Marcelo A.
Zagaja, Gregory P.
Shalhav, Arieh L.
author_sort Zorn, Kevin C.
collection PubMed
description We sought to evaluate post-operative return of urinary and sexual function in men undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP). Prospective assessment of urinary continence and sexual function was performed in patients undergoing RLRP. Subjective assessment involved the use of the validated RAND-36 Item Health Survey/UCLA Prostate Cancer Index questionnaire. Questionnaires were completed pre-operatively and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively. Subset analyses were performed to assess the effect of age on functional outcomes. A total of 338 consecutive patients underwent RLRP between February 2003 and August 2005. Included patients for evaluation comprised of 21, 129, and 150 patients, aged <50, 50–59, and ≥60 years old, respectively. Kaplan–Meier curve analysis demonstrated that younger men (<60 years) achieved subjective continence significantly earlier than older age group (≥60 years) (P = 0.02). Continence rates, however, equalized among all age groups at 1 year follow-up. Younger men (<50 years) also demonstrated a quicker and greater return of sexual function (P = 0.01), which persisted through assessment at 1 year post-operatively. Our results suggest that younger men may have an earlier return of continence and potency when compared to men > 60 years. Despite this finding, continence outcomes appear to be equal among age groups after 1 year of follow-up. Moreover, men < 60 years continue to report superior potency outcomes compared to men > 60 years at 1 year post-operatively. Such findings are valuable in counseling patients undergoing RLRP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4247449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42474492014-12-03 Age-stratified outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Zorn, Kevin C. Mendiola, Frederick P. Rapp, David E. Mikhail, Albert A. Lin, Shang Orvieto, Marcelo A. Zagaja, Gregory P. Shalhav, Arieh L. J Robot Surg Original Article We sought to evaluate post-operative return of urinary and sexual function in men undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP). Prospective assessment of urinary continence and sexual function was performed in patients undergoing RLRP. Subjective assessment involved the use of the validated RAND-36 Item Health Survey/UCLA Prostate Cancer Index questionnaire. Questionnaires were completed pre-operatively and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively. Subset analyses were performed to assess the effect of age on functional outcomes. A total of 338 consecutive patients underwent RLRP between February 2003 and August 2005. Included patients for evaluation comprised of 21, 129, and 150 patients, aged <50, 50–59, and ≥60 years old, respectively. Kaplan–Meier curve analysis demonstrated that younger men (<60 years) achieved subjective continence significantly earlier than older age group (≥60 years) (P = 0.02). Continence rates, however, equalized among all age groups at 1 year follow-up. Younger men (<50 years) also demonstrated a quicker and greater return of sexual function (P = 0.01), which persisted through assessment at 1 year post-operatively. Our results suggest that younger men may have an earlier return of continence and potency when compared to men > 60 years. Despite this finding, continence outcomes appear to be equal among age groups after 1 year of follow-up. Moreover, men < 60 years continue to report superior potency outcomes compared to men > 60 years at 1 year post-operatively. Such findings are valuable in counseling patients undergoing RLRP. Springer-Verlag 2007-01-24 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC4247449/ /pubmed/25484948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0009-y Text en © Springer London 2007
spellingShingle Original Article
Zorn, Kevin C.
Mendiola, Frederick P.
Rapp, David E.
Mikhail, Albert A.
Lin, Shang
Orvieto, Marcelo A.
Zagaja, Gregory P.
Shalhav, Arieh L.
Age-stratified outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title Age-stratified outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_full Age-stratified outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr Age-stratified outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Age-stratified outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_short Age-stratified outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_sort age-stratified outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4247449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25484948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0009-y
work_keys_str_mv AT zornkevinc agestratifiedoutcomesafterroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT mendiolafrederickp agestratifiedoutcomesafterroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT rappdavide agestratifiedoutcomesafterroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT mikhailalberta agestratifiedoutcomesafterroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT linshang agestratifiedoutcomesafterroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT orvietomarceloa agestratifiedoutcomesafterroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT zagajagregoryp agestratifiedoutcomesafterroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT shalhavariehl agestratifiedoutcomesafterroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy