Cargando…

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Our aim was to examine the current status of minimally invasive approaches to ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction and compare it to the gold standard of open pyeloplasty. A review of the literature was conducted using PubMed and Medline databases for UPJ obstruction. Open pyeloplasty achieves g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Vipul R., Patil, Nilesh N., Coughlin, Geoff, Dangle, Pankaj P., Palmer, Kenneth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4247458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25484972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0065-3
_version_ 1782346641238392832
author Patel, Vipul R.
Patil, Nilesh N.
Coughlin, Geoff
Dangle, Pankaj P.
Palmer, Kenneth
author_facet Patel, Vipul R.
Patil, Nilesh N.
Coughlin, Geoff
Dangle, Pankaj P.
Palmer, Kenneth
author_sort Patel, Vipul R.
collection PubMed
description Our aim was to examine the current status of minimally invasive approaches to ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction and compare it to the gold standard of open pyeloplasty. A review of the literature was conducted using PubMed and Medline databases for UPJ obstruction. Open pyeloplasty achieves good results, in the range of 90–100%. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty results are as good as those of open surgery. However, the goal of laparoscopic pyeloplasty as a means of providing minimally invasive surgery to a larger number of patients has not been achieved. The reason for this is the difficulty faced by most urologists in acquiring the technical skills to perform a laparoscopic pyeloplasty. In reports of robot-assisted pyeloplasty, results in the range of 88–97% appear to be achieved. Robotic technology has the potential to make minimally invasive pyeloplasty an easier skill to acquire for a larger number of urologists. Long-term data are still required to determine its efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4247458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42474582014-12-03 Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction Patel, Vipul R. Patil, Nilesh N. Coughlin, Geoff Dangle, Pankaj P. Palmer, Kenneth J Robot Surg Review Article Our aim was to examine the current status of minimally invasive approaches to ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction and compare it to the gold standard of open pyeloplasty. A review of the literature was conducted using PubMed and Medline databases for UPJ obstruction. Open pyeloplasty achieves good results, in the range of 90–100%. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty results are as good as those of open surgery. However, the goal of laparoscopic pyeloplasty as a means of providing minimally invasive surgery to a larger number of patients has not been achieved. The reason for this is the difficulty faced by most urologists in acquiring the technical skills to perform a laparoscopic pyeloplasty. In reports of robot-assisted pyeloplasty, results in the range of 88–97% appear to be achieved. Robotic technology has the potential to make minimally invasive pyeloplasty an easier skill to acquire for a larger number of urologists. Long-term data are still required to determine its efficacy. Springer-Verlag 2008-01-08 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC4247458/ /pubmed/25484972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0065-3 Text en © Springer London 2008
spellingShingle Review Article
Patel, Vipul R.
Patil, Nilesh N.
Coughlin, Geoff
Dangle, Pankaj P.
Palmer, Kenneth
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction
title Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction
title_full Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction
title_fullStr Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction
title_full_unstemmed Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction
title_short Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction
title_sort robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4247458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25484972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0065-3
work_keys_str_mv AT patelvipulr robotassistedlaparoscopicpyeloplastyareviewofminimallyinvasivetreatmentoptionsforureteropelvicjunctionobstruction
AT patilnileshn robotassistedlaparoscopicpyeloplastyareviewofminimallyinvasivetreatmentoptionsforureteropelvicjunctionobstruction
AT coughlingeoff robotassistedlaparoscopicpyeloplastyareviewofminimallyinvasivetreatmentoptionsforureteropelvicjunctionobstruction
AT danglepankajp robotassistedlaparoscopicpyeloplastyareviewofminimallyinvasivetreatmentoptionsforureteropelvicjunctionobstruction
AT palmerkenneth robotassistedlaparoscopicpyeloplastyareviewofminimallyinvasivetreatmentoptionsforureteropelvicjunctionobstruction