Cargando…
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction
Our aim was to examine the current status of minimally invasive approaches to ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction and compare it to the gold standard of open pyeloplasty. A review of the literature was conducted using PubMed and Medline databases for UPJ obstruction. Open pyeloplasty achieves g...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4247458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25484972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0065-3 |
_version_ | 1782346641238392832 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Vipul R. Patil, Nilesh N. Coughlin, Geoff Dangle, Pankaj P. Palmer, Kenneth |
author_facet | Patel, Vipul R. Patil, Nilesh N. Coughlin, Geoff Dangle, Pankaj P. Palmer, Kenneth |
author_sort | Patel, Vipul R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our aim was to examine the current status of minimally invasive approaches to ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction and compare it to the gold standard of open pyeloplasty. A review of the literature was conducted using PubMed and Medline databases for UPJ obstruction. Open pyeloplasty achieves good results, in the range of 90–100%. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty results are as good as those of open surgery. However, the goal of laparoscopic pyeloplasty as a means of providing minimally invasive surgery to a larger number of patients has not been achieved. The reason for this is the difficulty faced by most urologists in acquiring the technical skills to perform a laparoscopic pyeloplasty. In reports of robot-assisted pyeloplasty, results in the range of 88–97% appear to be achieved. Robotic technology has the potential to make minimally invasive pyeloplasty an easier skill to acquire for a larger number of urologists. Long-term data are still required to determine its efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4247458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42474582014-12-03 Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction Patel, Vipul R. Patil, Nilesh N. Coughlin, Geoff Dangle, Pankaj P. Palmer, Kenneth J Robot Surg Review Article Our aim was to examine the current status of minimally invasive approaches to ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction and compare it to the gold standard of open pyeloplasty. A review of the literature was conducted using PubMed and Medline databases for UPJ obstruction. Open pyeloplasty achieves good results, in the range of 90–100%. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty results are as good as those of open surgery. However, the goal of laparoscopic pyeloplasty as a means of providing minimally invasive surgery to a larger number of patients has not been achieved. The reason for this is the difficulty faced by most urologists in acquiring the technical skills to perform a laparoscopic pyeloplasty. In reports of robot-assisted pyeloplasty, results in the range of 88–97% appear to be achieved. Robotic technology has the potential to make minimally invasive pyeloplasty an easier skill to acquire for a larger number of urologists. Long-term data are still required to determine its efficacy. Springer-Verlag 2008-01-08 2008 /pmc/articles/PMC4247458/ /pubmed/25484972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0065-3 Text en © Springer London 2008 |
spellingShingle | Review Article Patel, Vipul R. Patil, Nilesh N. Coughlin, Geoff Dangle, Pankaj P. Palmer, Kenneth Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction |
title | Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction |
title_full | Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction |
title_fullStr | Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction |
title_short | Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction |
title_sort | robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4247458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25484972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0065-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelvipulr robotassistedlaparoscopicpyeloplastyareviewofminimallyinvasivetreatmentoptionsforureteropelvicjunctionobstruction AT patilnileshn robotassistedlaparoscopicpyeloplastyareviewofminimallyinvasivetreatmentoptionsforureteropelvicjunctionobstruction AT coughlingeoff robotassistedlaparoscopicpyeloplastyareviewofminimallyinvasivetreatmentoptionsforureteropelvicjunctionobstruction AT danglepankajp robotassistedlaparoscopicpyeloplastyareviewofminimallyinvasivetreatmentoptionsforureteropelvicjunctionobstruction AT palmerkenneth robotassistedlaparoscopicpyeloplastyareviewofminimallyinvasivetreatmentoptionsforureteropelvicjunctionobstruction |