Cargando…

A review of state regulations to promote infant physical activity in child care

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review state regulations promoting increased physical activity and decreased sedentary behaviors in infants in child care and to assess consistency with recent Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations. METHODS: We compared existing state and territory...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slining, Meghan M, Benjamin Neelon, Sara E, Duffey, Kiyah J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4247659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25416613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0139-3
_version_ 1782346676133953536
author Slining, Meghan M
Benjamin Neelon, Sara E
Duffey, Kiyah J
author_facet Slining, Meghan M
Benjamin Neelon, Sara E
Duffey, Kiyah J
author_sort Slining, Meghan M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review state regulations promoting increased physical activity and decreased sedentary behaviors in infants in child care and to assess consistency with recent Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations. METHODS: We compared existing state and territory licensing and administrative regulations to recent IOM recommendations to promote physical activity and decrease sedentary time in very young children attending out-of-home child care (both child care centers and family child care homes). Three independent reviewers searched two sources (a publicly available website and WestlawNext™) and compared regulations with five IOM recommendations: 1) providing daily opportunities for infants to move, 2) engaging with infants on the ground, 3) providing daily tummy time for infants less than six months of age, 4) using cribs, car seats and high chairs for their primary purpose, and 5) limiting the use of restrictive equipment for holding infants while they are awake. We used Pearson chi-square tests to assess associations between geographic region, year of last update, and number of state regulations consistent with the IOM recommendations. RESULTS: The mean (SD) number of regulations for states was 1.9 (1.3) for centers and 1.6 (1.2) for homes out of a possible 5.0. Two states had regulations for all five recommendations, Arizona for centers and Virginia for homes. Six states and territories had zero regulations for child care centers and seven states and territories had zero regulations for family child care homes. There were no significant associations between geographic region and number of regulations consistent with IOM recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Out-of-home child care settings are important targets for optimal early child health interventions. While most states had some regulations related to the promotion of physical activity among infants, few states had regulations for more than three of the five IOM recommendations. Enhancing state regulations in child care facilities could aid in early childhood obesity prevention efforts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4247659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42476592014-11-30 A review of state regulations to promote infant physical activity in child care Slining, Meghan M Benjamin Neelon, Sara E Duffey, Kiyah J Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review state regulations promoting increased physical activity and decreased sedentary behaviors in infants in child care and to assess consistency with recent Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations. METHODS: We compared existing state and territory licensing and administrative regulations to recent IOM recommendations to promote physical activity and decrease sedentary time in very young children attending out-of-home child care (both child care centers and family child care homes). Three independent reviewers searched two sources (a publicly available website and WestlawNext™) and compared regulations with five IOM recommendations: 1) providing daily opportunities for infants to move, 2) engaging with infants on the ground, 3) providing daily tummy time for infants less than six months of age, 4) using cribs, car seats and high chairs for their primary purpose, and 5) limiting the use of restrictive equipment for holding infants while they are awake. We used Pearson chi-square tests to assess associations between geographic region, year of last update, and number of state regulations consistent with the IOM recommendations. RESULTS: The mean (SD) number of regulations for states was 1.9 (1.3) for centers and 1.6 (1.2) for homes out of a possible 5.0. Two states had regulations for all five recommendations, Arizona for centers and Virginia for homes. Six states and territories had zero regulations for child care centers and seven states and territories had zero regulations for family child care homes. There were no significant associations between geographic region and number of regulations consistent with IOM recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Out-of-home child care settings are important targets for optimal early child health interventions. While most states had some regulations related to the promotion of physical activity among infants, few states had regulations for more than three of the five IOM recommendations. Enhancing state regulations in child care facilities could aid in early childhood obesity prevention efforts. BioMed Central 2014-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4247659/ /pubmed/25416613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0139-3 Text en © Slining et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Slining, Meghan M
Benjamin Neelon, Sara E
Duffey, Kiyah J
A review of state regulations to promote infant physical activity in child care
title A review of state regulations to promote infant physical activity in child care
title_full A review of state regulations to promote infant physical activity in child care
title_fullStr A review of state regulations to promote infant physical activity in child care
title_full_unstemmed A review of state regulations to promote infant physical activity in child care
title_short A review of state regulations to promote infant physical activity in child care
title_sort review of state regulations to promote infant physical activity in child care
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4247659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25416613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0139-3
work_keys_str_mv AT sliningmeghanm areviewofstateregulationstopromoteinfantphysicalactivityinchildcare
AT benjaminneelonsarae areviewofstateregulationstopromoteinfantphysicalactivityinchildcare
AT duffeykiyahj areviewofstateregulationstopromoteinfantphysicalactivityinchildcare
AT sliningmeghanm reviewofstateregulationstopromoteinfantphysicalactivityinchildcare
AT benjaminneelonsarae reviewofstateregulationstopromoteinfantphysicalactivityinchildcare
AT duffeykiyahj reviewofstateregulationstopromoteinfantphysicalactivityinchildcare