Cargando…

Screening Donated Blood for Transfusion Transmitted Infections by Serology along with NAT and Response Rate to Notification of Reactive Results: An Indian Experience

Background. Transfusion safety begins with healthy donors. A fundamental part of preventing transfusion transmitted infections (TTIs) is to notify and counsel reactive donors. Donor notification and counselling protect the health of the donor and prevent secondary transmission of infectious diseases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaurasia, Rahul, Zaman, Shamsuz, Das, Bankim, Chatterjee, Kabita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4248483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25485163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/412105
_version_ 1782346810537279488
author Chaurasia, Rahul
Zaman, Shamsuz
Das, Bankim
Chatterjee, Kabita
author_facet Chaurasia, Rahul
Zaman, Shamsuz
Das, Bankim
Chatterjee, Kabita
author_sort Chaurasia, Rahul
collection PubMed
description Background. Transfusion safety begins with healthy donors. A fundamental part of preventing transfusion transmitted infections (TTIs) is to notify and counsel reactive donors. Donor notification and counselling protect the health of the donor and prevent secondary transmission of infectious diseases. Methods. 113,014 donations were screened for TTIs, namely, HIV, HBV, HCV, and syphilis, by serology and nucleic acid testing. All reactive donors were retested (wherever possible) and notified of their status by telephone or letter. All initial reactive screens were followed over six months. Results. We evaluated 2,838 (2.51%) cases with reactive screening test results (1.38% HBV, 0.54% HCV, 0.27% HIV, and 0.32% syphilis). Only 23.3% of donors (662) responded to notification. The response among voluntary donors was better as compared to the replacement donors (43.6% versus 21.2%). Only 373 (56.3%) responsive donors followed their first attendance at referral specialties. Over six months, only 176 of 662 (26.6%) reactive donors received treatment. Conclusion. Our study shed light on the importance of proper donor counselling and notification of TTI status to all reactive donors who opt to receive this information. There is also an urgent need to formulate the nationally acceptable guidelines for notification and follow-up of reactive donors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4248483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42484832014-12-07 Screening Donated Blood for Transfusion Transmitted Infections by Serology along with NAT and Response Rate to Notification of Reactive Results: An Indian Experience Chaurasia, Rahul Zaman, Shamsuz Das, Bankim Chatterjee, Kabita J Blood Transfus Research Article Background. Transfusion safety begins with healthy donors. A fundamental part of preventing transfusion transmitted infections (TTIs) is to notify and counsel reactive donors. Donor notification and counselling protect the health of the donor and prevent secondary transmission of infectious diseases. Methods. 113,014 donations were screened for TTIs, namely, HIV, HBV, HCV, and syphilis, by serology and nucleic acid testing. All reactive donors were retested (wherever possible) and notified of their status by telephone or letter. All initial reactive screens were followed over six months. Results. We evaluated 2,838 (2.51%) cases with reactive screening test results (1.38% HBV, 0.54% HCV, 0.27% HIV, and 0.32% syphilis). Only 23.3% of donors (662) responded to notification. The response among voluntary donors was better as compared to the replacement donors (43.6% versus 21.2%). Only 373 (56.3%) responsive donors followed their first attendance at referral specialties. Over six months, only 176 of 662 (26.6%) reactive donors received treatment. Conclusion. Our study shed light on the importance of proper donor counselling and notification of TTI status to all reactive donors who opt to receive this information. There is also an urgent need to formulate the nationally acceptable guidelines for notification and follow-up of reactive donors. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4248483/ /pubmed/25485163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/412105 Text en Copyright © 2014 Rahul Chaurasia et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chaurasia, Rahul
Zaman, Shamsuz
Das, Bankim
Chatterjee, Kabita
Screening Donated Blood for Transfusion Transmitted Infections by Serology along with NAT and Response Rate to Notification of Reactive Results: An Indian Experience
title Screening Donated Blood for Transfusion Transmitted Infections by Serology along with NAT and Response Rate to Notification of Reactive Results: An Indian Experience
title_full Screening Donated Blood for Transfusion Transmitted Infections by Serology along with NAT and Response Rate to Notification of Reactive Results: An Indian Experience
title_fullStr Screening Donated Blood for Transfusion Transmitted Infections by Serology along with NAT and Response Rate to Notification of Reactive Results: An Indian Experience
title_full_unstemmed Screening Donated Blood for Transfusion Transmitted Infections by Serology along with NAT and Response Rate to Notification of Reactive Results: An Indian Experience
title_short Screening Donated Blood for Transfusion Transmitted Infections by Serology along with NAT and Response Rate to Notification of Reactive Results: An Indian Experience
title_sort screening donated blood for transfusion transmitted infections by serology along with nat and response rate to notification of reactive results: an indian experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4248483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25485163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/412105
work_keys_str_mv AT chaurasiarahul screeningdonatedbloodfortransfusiontransmittedinfectionsbyserologyalongwithnatandresponseratetonotificationofreactiveresultsanindianexperience
AT zamanshamsuz screeningdonatedbloodfortransfusiontransmittedinfectionsbyserologyalongwithnatandresponseratetonotificationofreactiveresultsanindianexperience
AT dasbankim screeningdonatedbloodfortransfusiontransmittedinfectionsbyserologyalongwithnatandresponseratetonotificationofreactiveresultsanindianexperience
AT chatterjeekabita screeningdonatedbloodfortransfusiontransmittedinfectionsbyserologyalongwithnatandresponseratetonotificationofreactiveresultsanindianexperience