Cargando…
Screening Donated Blood for Transfusion Transmitted Infections by Serology along with NAT and Response Rate to Notification of Reactive Results: An Indian Experience
Background. Transfusion safety begins with healthy donors. A fundamental part of preventing transfusion transmitted infections (TTIs) is to notify and counsel reactive donors. Donor notification and counselling protect the health of the donor and prevent secondary transmission of infectious diseases...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4248483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25485163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/412105 |
_version_ | 1782346810537279488 |
---|---|
author | Chaurasia, Rahul Zaman, Shamsuz Das, Bankim Chatterjee, Kabita |
author_facet | Chaurasia, Rahul Zaman, Shamsuz Das, Bankim Chatterjee, Kabita |
author_sort | Chaurasia, Rahul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Transfusion safety begins with healthy donors. A fundamental part of preventing transfusion transmitted infections (TTIs) is to notify and counsel reactive donors. Donor notification and counselling protect the health of the donor and prevent secondary transmission of infectious diseases. Methods. 113,014 donations were screened for TTIs, namely, HIV, HBV, HCV, and syphilis, by serology and nucleic acid testing. All reactive donors were retested (wherever possible) and notified of their status by telephone or letter. All initial reactive screens were followed over six months. Results. We evaluated 2,838 (2.51%) cases with reactive screening test results (1.38% HBV, 0.54% HCV, 0.27% HIV, and 0.32% syphilis). Only 23.3% of donors (662) responded to notification. The response among voluntary donors was better as compared to the replacement donors (43.6% versus 21.2%). Only 373 (56.3%) responsive donors followed their first attendance at referral specialties. Over six months, only 176 of 662 (26.6%) reactive donors received treatment. Conclusion. Our study shed light on the importance of proper donor counselling and notification of TTI status to all reactive donors who opt to receive this information. There is also an urgent need to formulate the nationally acceptable guidelines for notification and follow-up of reactive donors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4248483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42484832014-12-07 Screening Donated Blood for Transfusion Transmitted Infections by Serology along with NAT and Response Rate to Notification of Reactive Results: An Indian Experience Chaurasia, Rahul Zaman, Shamsuz Das, Bankim Chatterjee, Kabita J Blood Transfus Research Article Background. Transfusion safety begins with healthy donors. A fundamental part of preventing transfusion transmitted infections (TTIs) is to notify and counsel reactive donors. Donor notification and counselling protect the health of the donor and prevent secondary transmission of infectious diseases. Methods. 113,014 donations were screened for TTIs, namely, HIV, HBV, HCV, and syphilis, by serology and nucleic acid testing. All reactive donors were retested (wherever possible) and notified of their status by telephone or letter. All initial reactive screens were followed over six months. Results. We evaluated 2,838 (2.51%) cases with reactive screening test results (1.38% HBV, 0.54% HCV, 0.27% HIV, and 0.32% syphilis). Only 23.3% of donors (662) responded to notification. The response among voluntary donors was better as compared to the replacement donors (43.6% versus 21.2%). Only 373 (56.3%) responsive donors followed their first attendance at referral specialties. Over six months, only 176 of 662 (26.6%) reactive donors received treatment. Conclusion. Our study shed light on the importance of proper donor counselling and notification of TTI status to all reactive donors who opt to receive this information. There is also an urgent need to formulate the nationally acceptable guidelines for notification and follow-up of reactive donors. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4248483/ /pubmed/25485163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/412105 Text en Copyright © 2014 Rahul Chaurasia et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chaurasia, Rahul Zaman, Shamsuz Das, Bankim Chatterjee, Kabita Screening Donated Blood for Transfusion Transmitted Infections by Serology along with NAT and Response Rate to Notification of Reactive Results: An Indian Experience |
title | Screening Donated Blood for Transfusion Transmitted Infections by Serology along with NAT and Response Rate to Notification of Reactive Results: An Indian Experience |
title_full | Screening Donated Blood for Transfusion Transmitted Infections by Serology along with NAT and Response Rate to Notification of Reactive Results: An Indian Experience |
title_fullStr | Screening Donated Blood for Transfusion Transmitted Infections by Serology along with NAT and Response Rate to Notification of Reactive Results: An Indian Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Screening Donated Blood for Transfusion Transmitted Infections by Serology along with NAT and Response Rate to Notification of Reactive Results: An Indian Experience |
title_short | Screening Donated Blood for Transfusion Transmitted Infections by Serology along with NAT and Response Rate to Notification of Reactive Results: An Indian Experience |
title_sort | screening donated blood for transfusion transmitted infections by serology along with nat and response rate to notification of reactive results: an indian experience |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4248483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25485163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/412105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaurasiarahul screeningdonatedbloodfortransfusiontransmittedinfectionsbyserologyalongwithnatandresponseratetonotificationofreactiveresultsanindianexperience AT zamanshamsuz screeningdonatedbloodfortransfusiontransmittedinfectionsbyserologyalongwithnatandresponseratetonotificationofreactiveresultsanindianexperience AT dasbankim screeningdonatedbloodfortransfusiontransmittedinfectionsbyserologyalongwithnatandresponseratetonotificationofreactiveresultsanindianexperience AT chatterjeekabita screeningdonatedbloodfortransfusiontransmittedinfectionsbyserologyalongwithnatandresponseratetonotificationofreactiveresultsanindianexperience |