Cargando…
Visibility of Sutures of the Orbit and Periorbital Region Using Multidetector Computed Tomography
OBJECTIVE: Knowledge of cranial suture morphology is crucial in emergency medicine, forensic medicine, and maxillofacial reconstructive surgery. This study assessed the visibility of sutures of the orbit and periorbital region on multidetector computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multidetecto...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Radiology
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4248637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25469093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.6.802 |
_version_ | 1782346840484610048 |
---|---|
author | Gufler, Hubert Preiß, Markus Koesling, Sabrina |
author_facet | Gufler, Hubert Preiß, Markus Koesling, Sabrina |
author_sort | Gufler, Hubert |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Knowledge of cranial suture morphology is crucial in emergency medicine, forensic medicine, and maxillofacial reconstructive surgery. This study assessed the visibility of sutures of the orbit and periorbital region on multidetector computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multidetector computed tomography scans of 200 patients (127 males, 73 females; mean age 51.3 years; range, 6-92 years) were evaluated retrospectively. The slice thicknesses varied from 0.5 to 1 mm, and the tube current from 25 to 370 mAs, depending on the CT indication. The visibility of sutures was estimated according to a 4-point scale from "not visible" to "well visible". The chi-squared test was used to test the association of the visibility of sutures with the slice thickness, tube current, and age of patients. Statistical significance was assumed at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Overall, best visibility was found for the sutura frontozygomatica (98%), sutura frontonasalis (88.5%), and sutura sphenozygomatica (71.5%), followed by the sutura zygomaticomaxillaris (65.8%), sutura temporozygomatica (41.8%), sutura frontomaxillaris (44.5%), and sutura sphenofrontalis (31%). Poor visibility was found for the sutura frontolacrimalis (16.8%) and sutura frontoethmoidalis (1.3%). The sutura ethmoidomaxillaris, sutura lacrimomaxillaris, and sutura ethmoidolacrimalis were not visible. CONCLUSION: Although the sutures of the superior, lateral, and inferior orbit are well visible, those of the medial orbit are poorly visible on CT scans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4248637 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Radiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42486372014-12-02 Visibility of Sutures of the Orbit and Periorbital Region Using Multidetector Computed Tomography Gufler, Hubert Preiß, Markus Koesling, Sabrina Korean J Radiol Neuroimaging and Head & Neck OBJECTIVE: Knowledge of cranial suture morphology is crucial in emergency medicine, forensic medicine, and maxillofacial reconstructive surgery. This study assessed the visibility of sutures of the orbit and periorbital region on multidetector computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multidetector computed tomography scans of 200 patients (127 males, 73 females; mean age 51.3 years; range, 6-92 years) were evaluated retrospectively. The slice thicknesses varied from 0.5 to 1 mm, and the tube current from 25 to 370 mAs, depending on the CT indication. The visibility of sutures was estimated according to a 4-point scale from "not visible" to "well visible". The chi-squared test was used to test the association of the visibility of sutures with the slice thickness, tube current, and age of patients. Statistical significance was assumed at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Overall, best visibility was found for the sutura frontozygomatica (98%), sutura frontonasalis (88.5%), and sutura sphenozygomatica (71.5%), followed by the sutura zygomaticomaxillaris (65.8%), sutura temporozygomatica (41.8%), sutura frontomaxillaris (44.5%), and sutura sphenofrontalis (31%). Poor visibility was found for the sutura frontolacrimalis (16.8%) and sutura frontoethmoidalis (1.3%). The sutura ethmoidomaxillaris, sutura lacrimomaxillaris, and sutura ethmoidolacrimalis were not visible. CONCLUSION: Although the sutures of the superior, lateral, and inferior orbit are well visible, those of the medial orbit are poorly visible on CT scans. The Korean Society of Radiology 2014 2014-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4248637/ /pubmed/25469093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.6.802 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroimaging and Head & Neck Gufler, Hubert Preiß, Markus Koesling, Sabrina Visibility of Sutures of the Orbit and Periorbital Region Using Multidetector Computed Tomography |
title | Visibility of Sutures of the Orbit and Periorbital Region Using Multidetector Computed Tomography |
title_full | Visibility of Sutures of the Orbit and Periorbital Region Using Multidetector Computed Tomography |
title_fullStr | Visibility of Sutures of the Orbit and Periorbital Region Using Multidetector Computed Tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Visibility of Sutures of the Orbit and Periorbital Region Using Multidetector Computed Tomography |
title_short | Visibility of Sutures of the Orbit and Periorbital Region Using Multidetector Computed Tomography |
title_sort | visibility of sutures of the orbit and periorbital region using multidetector computed tomography |
topic | Neuroimaging and Head & Neck |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4248637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25469093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.6.802 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guflerhubert visibilityofsuturesoftheorbitandperiorbitalregionusingmultidetectorcomputedtomography AT preißmarkus visibilityofsuturesoftheorbitandperiorbitalregionusingmultidetectorcomputedtomography AT koeslingsabrina visibilityofsuturesoftheorbitandperiorbitalregionusingmultidetectorcomputedtomography |