Cargando…

Factors influencing malaria control policy-making in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania

BACKGROUND: Policy decisions for malaria control are often difficult to make as decision-makers have to carefully consider an array of options and respond to the needs of a large number of stakeholders. This study assessed the factors and specific objectives that influence malaria control policy dec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mutero, Clifford M, Kramer, Randall A, Paul, Christopher, Lesser, Adriane, Miranda, Marie Lynn, Mboera, Leonard EG, Kiptui, Rebecca, Kabatereine, Narcis, Ameneshewa, Birkinesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4249611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25107509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-305
_version_ 1782346867894386688
author Mutero, Clifford M
Kramer, Randall A
Paul, Christopher
Lesser, Adriane
Miranda, Marie Lynn
Mboera, Leonard EG
Kiptui, Rebecca
Kabatereine, Narcis
Ameneshewa, Birkinesh
author_facet Mutero, Clifford M
Kramer, Randall A
Paul, Christopher
Lesser, Adriane
Miranda, Marie Lynn
Mboera, Leonard EG
Kiptui, Rebecca
Kabatereine, Narcis
Ameneshewa, Birkinesh
author_sort Mutero, Clifford M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Policy decisions for malaria control are often difficult to make as decision-makers have to carefully consider an array of options and respond to the needs of a large number of stakeholders. This study assessed the factors and specific objectives that influence malaria control policy decisions, as a crucial first step towards developing an inclusive malaria decision analysis support tool (MDAST). METHODS: Country-specific stakeholder engagement activities using structured questionnaires were carried out in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. The survey respondents were drawn from a non-random purposeful sample of stakeholders, targeting individuals in ministries and non-governmental organizations whose policy decisions and actions are likely to have an impact on the status of malaria. Summary statistics across the three countries are presented in aggregate. RESULTS: Important findings aggregated across countries included a belief that donor preferences and agendas were exerting too much influence on malaria policies in the countries. Respondents on average also thought that some relevant objectives such as engaging members of parliament by the agency responsible for malaria control in a particular country were not being given enough consideration in malaria decision-making. Factors found to influence decisions regarding specific malaria control strategies included donor agendas, costs, effectiveness of interventions, health and environmental impacts, compliance and/acceptance, financial sustainability, and vector resistance to insecticides. CONCLUSION: Malaria control decision-makers in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania take into account health and environmental impacts as well as cost implications of different intervention strategies. Further engagement of government legislators and other policy makers is needed in order to increase funding from domestic sources, reduce donor dependence, sustain interventions and consolidate current gains in malaria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4249611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42496112014-12-02 Factors influencing malaria control policy-making in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania Mutero, Clifford M Kramer, Randall A Paul, Christopher Lesser, Adriane Miranda, Marie Lynn Mboera, Leonard EG Kiptui, Rebecca Kabatereine, Narcis Ameneshewa, Birkinesh Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Policy decisions for malaria control are often difficult to make as decision-makers have to carefully consider an array of options and respond to the needs of a large number of stakeholders. This study assessed the factors and specific objectives that influence malaria control policy decisions, as a crucial first step towards developing an inclusive malaria decision analysis support tool (MDAST). METHODS: Country-specific stakeholder engagement activities using structured questionnaires were carried out in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. The survey respondents were drawn from a non-random purposeful sample of stakeholders, targeting individuals in ministries and non-governmental organizations whose policy decisions and actions are likely to have an impact on the status of malaria. Summary statistics across the three countries are presented in aggregate. RESULTS: Important findings aggregated across countries included a belief that donor preferences and agendas were exerting too much influence on malaria policies in the countries. Respondents on average also thought that some relevant objectives such as engaging members of parliament by the agency responsible for malaria control in a particular country were not being given enough consideration in malaria decision-making. Factors found to influence decisions regarding specific malaria control strategies included donor agendas, costs, effectiveness of interventions, health and environmental impacts, compliance and/acceptance, financial sustainability, and vector resistance to insecticides. CONCLUSION: Malaria control decision-makers in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania take into account health and environmental impacts as well as cost implications of different intervention strategies. Further engagement of government legislators and other policy makers is needed in order to increase funding from domestic sources, reduce donor dependence, sustain interventions and consolidate current gains in malaria. BioMed Central 2014-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4249611/ /pubmed/25107509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-305 Text en © Mutero et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Mutero, Clifford M
Kramer, Randall A
Paul, Christopher
Lesser, Adriane
Miranda, Marie Lynn
Mboera, Leonard EG
Kiptui, Rebecca
Kabatereine, Narcis
Ameneshewa, Birkinesh
Factors influencing malaria control policy-making in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania
title Factors influencing malaria control policy-making in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania
title_full Factors influencing malaria control policy-making in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania
title_fullStr Factors influencing malaria control policy-making in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing malaria control policy-making in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania
title_short Factors influencing malaria control policy-making in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania
title_sort factors influencing malaria control policy-making in kenya, uganda and tanzania
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4249611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25107509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-305
work_keys_str_mv AT muterocliffordm factorsinfluencingmalariacontrolpolicymakinginkenyaugandaandtanzania
AT kramerrandalla factorsinfluencingmalariacontrolpolicymakinginkenyaugandaandtanzania
AT paulchristopher factorsinfluencingmalariacontrolpolicymakinginkenyaugandaandtanzania
AT lesseradriane factorsinfluencingmalariacontrolpolicymakinginkenyaugandaandtanzania
AT mirandamarielynn factorsinfluencingmalariacontrolpolicymakinginkenyaugandaandtanzania
AT mboeraleonardeg factorsinfluencingmalariacontrolpolicymakinginkenyaugandaandtanzania
AT kiptuirebecca factorsinfluencingmalariacontrolpolicymakinginkenyaugandaandtanzania
AT kabatereinenarcis factorsinfluencingmalariacontrolpolicymakinginkenyaugandaandtanzania
AT ameneshewabirkinesh factorsinfluencingmalariacontrolpolicymakinginkenyaugandaandtanzania