Cargando…

Do Differences in Chemical Composition of Stem and Cap of Amanita muscaria Fruiting Bodies Correlate with Topsoil Type?

Fly agaric (Amanita muscaria) was investigated using a (1)H NMR-based metabolomics approach. The caps and stems were studied separately, revealing different metabolic compositions. Additionally, multivariate data analyses of the fungal basidiomata and the type of soil were performed. Compared to the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deja, Stanisław, Wieczorek, Piotr P., Halama, Marek, Jasicka-Misiak, Izabela, Kafarski, Paweł, Poliwoda, Anna, Młynarz, Piotr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4249817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25437454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104084
_version_ 1782346894878441472
author Deja, Stanisław
Wieczorek, Piotr P.
Halama, Marek
Jasicka-Misiak, Izabela
Kafarski, Paweł
Poliwoda, Anna
Młynarz, Piotr
author_facet Deja, Stanisław
Wieczorek, Piotr P.
Halama, Marek
Jasicka-Misiak, Izabela
Kafarski, Paweł
Poliwoda, Anna
Młynarz, Piotr
author_sort Deja, Stanisław
collection PubMed
description Fly agaric (Amanita muscaria) was investigated using a (1)H NMR-based metabolomics approach. The caps and stems were studied separately, revealing different metabolic compositions. Additionally, multivariate data analyses of the fungal basidiomata and the type of soil were performed. Compared to the stems, A. muscaria caps exhibited higher concentrations of isoleucine, leucine, valine, alanine, aspartate, asparagine, threonine, lipids (mainly free fatty acids), choline, glycerophosphocholine (GPC), acetate, adenosine, uridine, 4-aminobutyrate, 6-hydroxynicotinate, quinolinate, UDP-carbohydrate and glycerol. Conversely, they exhibited lower concentrations of formate, fumarate, trehalose, α- and β-glucose. Six metabolites, malate, succinate, gluconate, N-acetylated compounds (NAC), tyrosine and phenylalanine, were detected in whole A. muscaria fruiting bodies but did not show significant differences in their levels between caps and stems (P value>0.05 and/or OPLS-DA loading correlation coefficient <0.4). This methodology allowed for the differentiation between the fruiting bodies of A. muscaria from mineral and mineral-organic topsoil. Moreover, the metabolomic approach and multivariate tools enabled to ascribe the basidiomata of fly agaric to the type of topsoil. Obtained results revealed that stems metabolome is more dependent on the topsoil type than caps. The correlation between metabolites and topsoil contents together with its properties exhibited mutual dependences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4249817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42498172014-12-05 Do Differences in Chemical Composition of Stem and Cap of Amanita muscaria Fruiting Bodies Correlate with Topsoil Type? Deja, Stanisław Wieczorek, Piotr P. Halama, Marek Jasicka-Misiak, Izabela Kafarski, Paweł Poliwoda, Anna Młynarz, Piotr PLoS One Research Article Fly agaric (Amanita muscaria) was investigated using a (1)H NMR-based metabolomics approach. The caps and stems were studied separately, revealing different metabolic compositions. Additionally, multivariate data analyses of the fungal basidiomata and the type of soil were performed. Compared to the stems, A. muscaria caps exhibited higher concentrations of isoleucine, leucine, valine, alanine, aspartate, asparagine, threonine, lipids (mainly free fatty acids), choline, glycerophosphocholine (GPC), acetate, adenosine, uridine, 4-aminobutyrate, 6-hydroxynicotinate, quinolinate, UDP-carbohydrate and glycerol. Conversely, they exhibited lower concentrations of formate, fumarate, trehalose, α- and β-glucose. Six metabolites, malate, succinate, gluconate, N-acetylated compounds (NAC), tyrosine and phenylalanine, were detected in whole A. muscaria fruiting bodies but did not show significant differences in their levels between caps and stems (P value>0.05 and/or OPLS-DA loading correlation coefficient <0.4). This methodology allowed for the differentiation between the fruiting bodies of A. muscaria from mineral and mineral-organic topsoil. Moreover, the metabolomic approach and multivariate tools enabled to ascribe the basidiomata of fly agaric to the type of topsoil. Obtained results revealed that stems metabolome is more dependent on the topsoil type than caps. The correlation between metabolites and topsoil contents together with its properties exhibited mutual dependences. Public Library of Science 2014-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4249817/ /pubmed/25437454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104084 Text en © 2014 Deja et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Deja, Stanisław
Wieczorek, Piotr P.
Halama, Marek
Jasicka-Misiak, Izabela
Kafarski, Paweł
Poliwoda, Anna
Młynarz, Piotr
Do Differences in Chemical Composition of Stem and Cap of Amanita muscaria Fruiting Bodies Correlate with Topsoil Type?
title Do Differences in Chemical Composition of Stem and Cap of Amanita muscaria Fruiting Bodies Correlate with Topsoil Type?
title_full Do Differences in Chemical Composition of Stem and Cap of Amanita muscaria Fruiting Bodies Correlate with Topsoil Type?
title_fullStr Do Differences in Chemical Composition of Stem and Cap of Amanita muscaria Fruiting Bodies Correlate with Topsoil Type?
title_full_unstemmed Do Differences in Chemical Composition of Stem and Cap of Amanita muscaria Fruiting Bodies Correlate with Topsoil Type?
title_short Do Differences in Chemical Composition of Stem and Cap of Amanita muscaria Fruiting Bodies Correlate with Topsoil Type?
title_sort do differences in chemical composition of stem and cap of amanita muscaria fruiting bodies correlate with topsoil type?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4249817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25437454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104084
work_keys_str_mv AT dejastanisław dodifferencesinchemicalcompositionofstemandcapofamanitamuscariafruitingbodiescorrelatewithtopsoiltype
AT wieczorekpiotrp dodifferencesinchemicalcompositionofstemandcapofamanitamuscariafruitingbodiescorrelatewithtopsoiltype
AT halamamarek dodifferencesinchemicalcompositionofstemandcapofamanitamuscariafruitingbodiescorrelatewithtopsoiltype
AT jasickamisiakizabela dodifferencesinchemicalcompositionofstemandcapofamanitamuscariafruitingbodiescorrelatewithtopsoiltype
AT kafarskipaweł dodifferencesinchemicalcompositionofstemandcapofamanitamuscariafruitingbodiescorrelatewithtopsoiltype
AT poliwodaanna dodifferencesinchemicalcompositionofstemandcapofamanitamuscariafruitingbodiescorrelatewithtopsoiltype
AT młynarzpiotr dodifferencesinchemicalcompositionofstemandcapofamanitamuscariafruitingbodiescorrelatewithtopsoiltype