Cargando…

Cost Effectiveness of New Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Two Different European Healthcare Settings

OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to investigate the cost effectiveness of apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran compared with coumarin derivatives for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in a country with specialized anticoagulation clinics (the Netherlands) and in a country withou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verhoef, Talitha I., Redekop, William K., Hasrat, Fazila, de Boer, Anthonius, Maitland-van der Zee, Anke Hilse
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4250561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25326294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40256-014-0092-1
_version_ 1782346964503887872
author Verhoef, Talitha I.
Redekop, William K.
Hasrat, Fazila
de Boer, Anthonius
Maitland-van der Zee, Anke Hilse
author_facet Verhoef, Talitha I.
Redekop, William K.
Hasrat, Fazila
de Boer, Anthonius
Maitland-van der Zee, Anke Hilse
author_sort Verhoef, Talitha I.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to investigate the cost effectiveness of apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran compared with coumarin derivatives for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in a country with specialized anticoagulation clinics (the Netherlands) and in a country without these clinics (the UK). METHODS: A decision-analytic Markov model was used to analyse the cost effectiveness of apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran compared with coumarin derivatives in the Netherlands and the UK over a lifetime horizon. RESULTS: In the Netherlands, the use of rivaroxaban, apixaban, or dabigatran increased health by 0.166, 0.365, and 0.374 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared with coumarin derivatives, but also increased costs by €5,681, €4,754, and €5,465, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were €34,248, €13,024, and €14,626 per QALY gained. In the UK, health was increased by 0.302, 0.455, and 0.461 QALYs, and the incremental costs were similar for all three new oral anticoagulants (€5,118–5,217). The ICERs varied from €11,172 to 16,949 per QALY gained. In the Netherlands, apixaban had the highest chance (37 %) of being cost effective at a threshold of €20,000; in the UK, this chance was 41 % for dabigatran. The quality of care, reflected in time in therapeutic range, had an important influence on the ICER. CONCLUSIONS: Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran are cost-effective alternatives to coumarin derivatives in the UK, while in the Netherlands, only apixaban and dabigatran could be considered cost effective. The cost effectiveness of the new oral anticoagulants is largely dependent on the setting and quality of local anticoagulant care facilities. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40256-014-0092-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4250561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42505612014-12-04 Cost Effectiveness of New Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Two Different European Healthcare Settings Verhoef, Talitha I. Redekop, William K. Hasrat, Fazila de Boer, Anthonius Maitland-van der Zee, Anke Hilse Am J Cardiovasc Drugs Original Research Article OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to investigate the cost effectiveness of apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran compared with coumarin derivatives for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in a country with specialized anticoagulation clinics (the Netherlands) and in a country without these clinics (the UK). METHODS: A decision-analytic Markov model was used to analyse the cost effectiveness of apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran compared with coumarin derivatives in the Netherlands and the UK over a lifetime horizon. RESULTS: In the Netherlands, the use of rivaroxaban, apixaban, or dabigatran increased health by 0.166, 0.365, and 0.374 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared with coumarin derivatives, but also increased costs by €5,681, €4,754, and €5,465, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were €34,248, €13,024, and €14,626 per QALY gained. In the UK, health was increased by 0.302, 0.455, and 0.461 QALYs, and the incremental costs were similar for all three new oral anticoagulants (€5,118–5,217). The ICERs varied from €11,172 to 16,949 per QALY gained. In the Netherlands, apixaban had the highest chance (37 %) of being cost effective at a threshold of €20,000; in the UK, this chance was 41 % for dabigatran. The quality of care, reflected in time in therapeutic range, had an important influence on the ICER. CONCLUSIONS: Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran are cost-effective alternatives to coumarin derivatives in the UK, while in the Netherlands, only apixaban and dabigatran could be considered cost effective. The cost effectiveness of the new oral anticoagulants is largely dependent on the setting and quality of local anticoagulant care facilities. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40256-014-0092-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2014-10-18 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4250561/ /pubmed/25326294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40256-014-0092-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Verhoef, Talitha I.
Redekop, William K.
Hasrat, Fazila
de Boer, Anthonius
Maitland-van der Zee, Anke Hilse
Cost Effectiveness of New Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Two Different European Healthcare Settings
title Cost Effectiveness of New Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Two Different European Healthcare Settings
title_full Cost Effectiveness of New Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Two Different European Healthcare Settings
title_fullStr Cost Effectiveness of New Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Two Different European Healthcare Settings
title_full_unstemmed Cost Effectiveness of New Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Two Different European Healthcare Settings
title_short Cost Effectiveness of New Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Two Different European Healthcare Settings
title_sort cost effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in two different european healthcare settings
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4250561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25326294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40256-014-0092-1
work_keys_str_mv AT verhoeftalithai costeffectivenessofneworalanticoagulantsforstrokepreventioninpatientswithatrialfibrillationintwodifferenteuropeanhealthcaresettings
AT redekopwilliamk costeffectivenessofneworalanticoagulantsforstrokepreventioninpatientswithatrialfibrillationintwodifferenteuropeanhealthcaresettings
AT hasratfazila costeffectivenessofneworalanticoagulantsforstrokepreventioninpatientswithatrialfibrillationintwodifferenteuropeanhealthcaresettings
AT deboeranthonius costeffectivenessofneworalanticoagulantsforstrokepreventioninpatientswithatrialfibrillationintwodifferenteuropeanhealthcaresettings
AT maitlandvanderzeeankehilse costeffectivenessofneworalanticoagulantsforstrokepreventioninpatientswithatrialfibrillationintwodifferenteuropeanhealthcaresettings