Cargando…

Does it Matter How We Pose the Question “How is Your Sense of Smell?”

There is a rather large, and unfortunate, discrepancy in the outcome between self-reported and standardized assessment of olfactory function. Questions for self-evaluation are commonly used that provide no information of with what to compare (comparison target) one’s olfactory function. We therefore...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wehling, Eike, Lundervold, Astri J., Nordin, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4250572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25485033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12078-014-9171-6
_version_ 1782346967087579136
author Wehling, Eike
Lundervold, Astri J.
Nordin, Steven
author_facet Wehling, Eike
Lundervold, Astri J.
Nordin, Steven
author_sort Wehling, Eike
collection PubMed
description There is a rather large, and unfortunate, discrepancy in the outcome between self-reported and standardized assessment of olfactory function. Questions for self-evaluation are commonly used that provide no information of with what to compare (comparison target) one’s olfactory function. We therefore investigated whether responses differed between an unspecific question and two questions providing comparison targets. Ninety-six healthy community-dwelling individuals (62.5 % women) aged 49–80 years evaluated their odor identification ability, followed by standardized assessment of odor identification ability. Results revealed that response patterns varied significantly depending on comparison target. While 81 % reported normal function when no further comparison target was presented, 69 % reported normal function when referring to age-related olfactory changes in identification ability. In turn, sensitivity of the accuracy of self-reported reduced odor identification ability (with standardized assessment as reference) increased from 11 to 37 %, whereas specificity decreased from 86 to 71 % when providing a comparison target. Accuracy of self-reported olfactory function can be increased by including a comparison target. However, standardized assessment is to be preferred over self-reported assessment, irrespective of how the question is formulated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4250572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42505722014-12-04 Does it Matter How We Pose the Question “How is Your Sense of Smell?” Wehling, Eike Lundervold, Astri J. Nordin, Steven Chemosens Percept Article There is a rather large, and unfortunate, discrepancy in the outcome between self-reported and standardized assessment of olfactory function. Questions for self-evaluation are commonly used that provide no information of with what to compare (comparison target) one’s olfactory function. We therefore investigated whether responses differed between an unspecific question and two questions providing comparison targets. Ninety-six healthy community-dwelling individuals (62.5 % women) aged 49–80 years evaluated their odor identification ability, followed by standardized assessment of odor identification ability. Results revealed that response patterns varied significantly depending on comparison target. While 81 % reported normal function when no further comparison target was presented, 69 % reported normal function when referring to age-related olfactory changes in identification ability. In turn, sensitivity of the accuracy of self-reported reduced odor identification ability (with standardized assessment as reference) increased from 11 to 37 %, whereas specificity decreased from 86 to 71 % when providing a comparison target. Accuracy of self-reported olfactory function can be increased by including a comparison target. However, standardized assessment is to be preferred over self-reported assessment, irrespective of how the question is formulated. Springer US 2014-07-29 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4250572/ /pubmed/25485033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12078-014-9171-6 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014
spellingShingle Article
Wehling, Eike
Lundervold, Astri J.
Nordin, Steven
Does it Matter How We Pose the Question “How is Your Sense of Smell?”
title Does it Matter How We Pose the Question “How is Your Sense of Smell?”
title_full Does it Matter How We Pose the Question “How is Your Sense of Smell?”
title_fullStr Does it Matter How We Pose the Question “How is Your Sense of Smell?”
title_full_unstemmed Does it Matter How We Pose the Question “How is Your Sense of Smell?”
title_short Does it Matter How We Pose the Question “How is Your Sense of Smell?”
title_sort does it matter how we pose the question “how is your sense of smell?”
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4250572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25485033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12078-014-9171-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wehlingeike doesitmatterhowweposethequestionhowisyoursenseofsmell
AT lundervoldastrij doesitmatterhowweposethequestionhowisyoursenseofsmell
AT nordinsteven doesitmatterhowweposethequestionhowisyoursenseofsmell