Cargando…
Does it Matter How We Pose the Question “How is Your Sense of Smell?”
There is a rather large, and unfortunate, discrepancy in the outcome between self-reported and standardized assessment of olfactory function. Questions for self-evaluation are commonly used that provide no information of with what to compare (comparison target) one’s olfactory function. We therefore...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4250572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25485033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12078-014-9171-6 |
_version_ | 1782346967087579136 |
---|---|
author | Wehling, Eike Lundervold, Astri J. Nordin, Steven |
author_facet | Wehling, Eike Lundervold, Astri J. Nordin, Steven |
author_sort | Wehling, Eike |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a rather large, and unfortunate, discrepancy in the outcome between self-reported and standardized assessment of olfactory function. Questions for self-evaluation are commonly used that provide no information of with what to compare (comparison target) one’s olfactory function. We therefore investigated whether responses differed between an unspecific question and two questions providing comparison targets. Ninety-six healthy community-dwelling individuals (62.5 % women) aged 49–80 years evaluated their odor identification ability, followed by standardized assessment of odor identification ability. Results revealed that response patterns varied significantly depending on comparison target. While 81 % reported normal function when no further comparison target was presented, 69 % reported normal function when referring to age-related olfactory changes in identification ability. In turn, sensitivity of the accuracy of self-reported reduced odor identification ability (with standardized assessment as reference) increased from 11 to 37 %, whereas specificity decreased from 86 to 71 % when providing a comparison target. Accuracy of self-reported olfactory function can be increased by including a comparison target. However, standardized assessment is to be preferred over self-reported assessment, irrespective of how the question is formulated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4250572 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42505722014-12-04 Does it Matter How We Pose the Question “How is Your Sense of Smell?” Wehling, Eike Lundervold, Astri J. Nordin, Steven Chemosens Percept Article There is a rather large, and unfortunate, discrepancy in the outcome between self-reported and standardized assessment of olfactory function. Questions for self-evaluation are commonly used that provide no information of with what to compare (comparison target) one’s olfactory function. We therefore investigated whether responses differed between an unspecific question and two questions providing comparison targets. Ninety-six healthy community-dwelling individuals (62.5 % women) aged 49–80 years evaluated their odor identification ability, followed by standardized assessment of odor identification ability. Results revealed that response patterns varied significantly depending on comparison target. While 81 % reported normal function when no further comparison target was presented, 69 % reported normal function when referring to age-related olfactory changes in identification ability. In turn, sensitivity of the accuracy of self-reported reduced odor identification ability (with standardized assessment as reference) increased from 11 to 37 %, whereas specificity decreased from 86 to 71 % when providing a comparison target. Accuracy of self-reported olfactory function can be increased by including a comparison target. However, standardized assessment is to be preferred over self-reported assessment, irrespective of how the question is formulated. Springer US 2014-07-29 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4250572/ /pubmed/25485033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12078-014-9171-6 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 |
spellingShingle | Article Wehling, Eike Lundervold, Astri J. Nordin, Steven Does it Matter How We Pose the Question “How is Your Sense of Smell?” |
title | Does it Matter How We Pose the Question “How is Your Sense of Smell?” |
title_full | Does it Matter How We Pose the Question “How is Your Sense of Smell?” |
title_fullStr | Does it Matter How We Pose the Question “How is Your Sense of Smell?” |
title_full_unstemmed | Does it Matter How We Pose the Question “How is Your Sense of Smell?” |
title_short | Does it Matter How We Pose the Question “How is Your Sense of Smell?” |
title_sort | does it matter how we pose the question “how is your sense of smell?” |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4250572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25485033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12078-014-9171-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wehlingeike doesitmatterhowweposethequestionhowisyoursenseofsmell AT lundervoldastrij doesitmatterhowweposethequestionhowisyoursenseofsmell AT nordinsteven doesitmatterhowweposethequestionhowisyoursenseofsmell |