Cargando…
In vitro activities of amphotericin B deoxycholate and liposomal amphotericin B against 604 clinical yeast isolates
We determined the in vitro antifungal activity of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) against 604 clinical yeast isolates. Amphotericin B deoxycholate (D-AmB) was tested in parallel against all the isolates. Susceptibility testing was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society for General Microbiology
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4250836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.075507-0 |
_version_ | 1782346970416807936 |
---|---|
author | Montagna, Maria Teresa Lovero, Grazia Coretti, Caterina De Giglio, Osvalda Martinelli, Domenico Bedini, Andrea Delia, Mario Rosato, Antonio Codeluppi, Mauro Caggiano, Giuseppina |
author_facet | Montagna, Maria Teresa Lovero, Grazia Coretti, Caterina De Giglio, Osvalda Martinelli, Domenico Bedini, Andrea Delia, Mario Rosato, Antonio Codeluppi, Mauro Caggiano, Giuseppina |
author_sort | Montagna, Maria Teresa |
collection | PubMed |
description | We determined the in vitro antifungal activity of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) against 604 clinical yeast isolates. Amphotericin B deoxycholate (D-AmB) was tested in parallel against all the isolates. Susceptibility testing was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M27-A3 method. Overall, L-AmB was highly active against the isolates (mean MIC, 0.42 µg ml(−1); MIC(90), 1 µg ml(−1); 97.2 % of MICs were ≤1 µg ml(−1)) and comparable to D-AmB (mean MIC, 0.48 µg ml(−1); MIC(90), 1 µg ml(−1); 97.3 % of MICs were ≤1 µg ml(−1)). The in vitro activity of D-AmB and L-AmB was correlated (R(2) = 0.61; exp(b), 2.3; 95 % CI, 2.19–2.44, P<0.001). Candida albicans (mean MICs of D-AmB and L-AmB, 0.39 µg ml(−1) and 0.31 µg ml(−1), respectively) and Candida parapsilosis (mean MICs of D-AmB and L-AmB, 0.38 µg ml(−1) and 0.35 µg ml(−1), respectively) were the species most susceptible to the agents tested, while Candida krusei (currently named Issatchenkia orientalis) (mean MICs of D-AmB and L-AmB, 1.27 µg ml(−1) and 1.13 µg ml(−1), respectively) was the least susceptible. The excellent in vitro activity of L-AmB may have important implications for empirical treatment approaches and support its role in treatment of a wide range of invasive infections due to yeasts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4250836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Society for General Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42508362014-12-23 In vitro activities of amphotericin B deoxycholate and liposomal amphotericin B against 604 clinical yeast isolates Montagna, Maria Teresa Lovero, Grazia Coretti, Caterina De Giglio, Osvalda Martinelli, Domenico Bedini, Andrea Delia, Mario Rosato, Antonio Codeluppi, Mauro Caggiano, Giuseppina J Med Microbiol Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy We determined the in vitro antifungal activity of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) against 604 clinical yeast isolates. Amphotericin B deoxycholate (D-AmB) was tested in parallel against all the isolates. Susceptibility testing was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M27-A3 method. Overall, L-AmB was highly active against the isolates (mean MIC, 0.42 µg ml(−1); MIC(90), 1 µg ml(−1); 97.2 % of MICs were ≤1 µg ml(−1)) and comparable to D-AmB (mean MIC, 0.48 µg ml(−1); MIC(90), 1 µg ml(−1); 97.3 % of MICs were ≤1 µg ml(−1)). The in vitro activity of D-AmB and L-AmB was correlated (R(2) = 0.61; exp(b), 2.3; 95 % CI, 2.19–2.44, P<0.001). Candida albicans (mean MICs of D-AmB and L-AmB, 0.39 µg ml(−1) and 0.31 µg ml(−1), respectively) and Candida parapsilosis (mean MICs of D-AmB and L-AmB, 0.38 µg ml(−1) and 0.35 µg ml(−1), respectively) were the species most susceptible to the agents tested, while Candida krusei (currently named Issatchenkia orientalis) (mean MICs of D-AmB and L-AmB, 1.27 µg ml(−1) and 1.13 µg ml(−1), respectively) was the least susceptible. The excellent in vitro activity of L-AmB may have important implications for empirical treatment approaches and support its role in treatment of a wide range of invasive infections due to yeasts. Society for General Microbiology 2014-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4250836/ /pubmed/25210203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.075507-0 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Montagna, Maria Teresa Lovero, Grazia Coretti, Caterina De Giglio, Osvalda Martinelli, Domenico Bedini, Andrea Delia, Mario Rosato, Antonio Codeluppi, Mauro Caggiano, Giuseppina In vitro activities of amphotericin B deoxycholate and liposomal amphotericin B against 604 clinical yeast isolates |
title | In vitro activities of amphotericin B deoxycholate and liposomal amphotericin B against 604 clinical yeast isolates |
title_full | In vitro activities of amphotericin B deoxycholate and liposomal amphotericin B against 604 clinical yeast isolates |
title_fullStr | In vitro activities of amphotericin B deoxycholate and liposomal amphotericin B against 604 clinical yeast isolates |
title_full_unstemmed | In vitro activities of amphotericin B deoxycholate and liposomal amphotericin B against 604 clinical yeast isolates |
title_short | In vitro activities of amphotericin B deoxycholate and liposomal amphotericin B against 604 clinical yeast isolates |
title_sort | in vitro activities of amphotericin b deoxycholate and liposomal amphotericin b against 604 clinical yeast isolates |
topic | Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4250836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.075507-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT montagnamariateresa invitroactivitiesofamphotericinbdeoxycholateandliposomalamphotericinbagainst604clinicalyeastisolates AT loverograzia invitroactivitiesofamphotericinbdeoxycholateandliposomalamphotericinbagainst604clinicalyeastisolates AT coretticaterina invitroactivitiesofamphotericinbdeoxycholateandliposomalamphotericinbagainst604clinicalyeastisolates AT degiglioosvalda invitroactivitiesofamphotericinbdeoxycholateandliposomalamphotericinbagainst604clinicalyeastisolates AT martinellidomenico invitroactivitiesofamphotericinbdeoxycholateandliposomalamphotericinbagainst604clinicalyeastisolates AT bediniandrea invitroactivitiesofamphotericinbdeoxycholateandliposomalamphotericinbagainst604clinicalyeastisolates AT deliamario invitroactivitiesofamphotericinbdeoxycholateandliposomalamphotericinbagainst604clinicalyeastisolates AT rosatoantonio invitroactivitiesofamphotericinbdeoxycholateandliposomalamphotericinbagainst604clinicalyeastisolates AT codeluppimauro invitroactivitiesofamphotericinbdeoxycholateandliposomalamphotericinbagainst604clinicalyeastisolates AT caggianogiuseppina invitroactivitiesofamphotericinbdeoxycholateandliposomalamphotericinbagainst604clinicalyeastisolates |