Cargando…
Cross-Sectional Studies Published in Indian Journal of Community Medicine: Evaluation of Adherence to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement
BACKGROUND: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement is a set of recommendations about what should be included in a more accurate and complete description of observational studies. AIM: The aim was to assess the quality of reporting of cross-section...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4250984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25506479 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.144889 |
_version_ | 1782346979566682112 |
---|---|
author | Jeelani, A Malik, WR Haq, I Aleem, S Mujtaba, M Syed, N |
author_facet | Jeelani, A Malik, WR Haq, I Aleem, S Mujtaba, M Syed, N |
author_sort | Jeelani, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement is a set of recommendations about what should be included in a more accurate and complete description of observational studies. AIM: The aim was to assess the quality of reporting of cross-sectional studies by evaluating the extent to which they adhere to the STROBE statement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study has a cross-sectional design. All the articles published as original articles in Indian Journal of Community Medicine from January 2010 to September 2011 were downloaded from the journal website. A total of 96 articles were downloaded out of which 80 were found to have a cross-sectional design. Variables were: (1) Percentage of STROBE items included in a report and (2) percentage of articles reporting each item in the STROBE checklist. Data analysis was done by descriptive statistics using frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: A total of 80 articles were evaluated. About 46% (37/80) articles reported 12–15 items of the STROBE checklist. Bias, nonparticipants and reasons for nonparticipation, other analyses done, generalizability, and source of funding were reported by < 25% of studies. The most frequently reported items of the checklist were summary of what was done and what was found in the abstract, background/rationale, objectives, setting, outcome data, key results in discussion, interpretation of results. None of the articles reported all items of the STROBE checklist. CONCLUSION: This study reveals that the quality of reporting cross-sectional studies in Indian Journal of Community Medicine is not satisfactory and there is room for improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4250984 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42509842014-12-12 Cross-Sectional Studies Published in Indian Journal of Community Medicine: Evaluation of Adherence to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement Jeelani, A Malik, WR Haq, I Aleem, S Mujtaba, M Syed, N Ann Med Health Sci Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement is a set of recommendations about what should be included in a more accurate and complete description of observational studies. AIM: The aim was to assess the quality of reporting of cross-sectional studies by evaluating the extent to which they adhere to the STROBE statement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study has a cross-sectional design. All the articles published as original articles in Indian Journal of Community Medicine from January 2010 to September 2011 were downloaded from the journal website. A total of 96 articles were downloaded out of which 80 were found to have a cross-sectional design. Variables were: (1) Percentage of STROBE items included in a report and (2) percentage of articles reporting each item in the STROBE checklist. Data analysis was done by descriptive statistics using frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: A total of 80 articles were evaluated. About 46% (37/80) articles reported 12–15 items of the STROBE checklist. Bias, nonparticipants and reasons for nonparticipation, other analyses done, generalizability, and source of funding were reported by < 25% of studies. The most frequently reported items of the checklist were summary of what was done and what was found in the abstract, background/rationale, objectives, setting, outcome data, key results in discussion, interpretation of results. None of the articles reported all items of the STROBE checklist. CONCLUSION: This study reveals that the quality of reporting cross-sectional studies in Indian Journal of Community Medicine is not satisfactory and there is room for improvement. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4250984/ /pubmed/25506479 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.144889 Text en Copyright: © Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jeelani, A Malik, WR Haq, I Aleem, S Mujtaba, M Syed, N Cross-Sectional Studies Published in Indian Journal of Community Medicine: Evaluation of Adherence to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement |
title | Cross-Sectional Studies Published in Indian Journal of Community Medicine: Evaluation of Adherence to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement |
title_full | Cross-Sectional Studies Published in Indian Journal of Community Medicine: Evaluation of Adherence to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement |
title_fullStr | Cross-Sectional Studies Published in Indian Journal of Community Medicine: Evaluation of Adherence to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement |
title_full_unstemmed | Cross-Sectional Studies Published in Indian Journal of Community Medicine: Evaluation of Adherence to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement |
title_short | Cross-Sectional Studies Published in Indian Journal of Community Medicine: Evaluation of Adherence to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement |
title_sort | cross-sectional studies published in indian journal of community medicine: evaluation of adherence to strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology statement |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4250984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25506479 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.144889 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeelania crosssectionalstudiespublishedinindianjournalofcommunitymedicineevaluationofadherencetostrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystatement AT malikwr crosssectionalstudiespublishedinindianjournalofcommunitymedicineevaluationofadherencetostrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystatement AT haqi crosssectionalstudiespublishedinindianjournalofcommunitymedicineevaluationofadherencetostrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystatement AT aleems crosssectionalstudiespublishedinindianjournalofcommunitymedicineevaluationofadherencetostrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystatement AT mujtabam crosssectionalstudiespublishedinindianjournalofcommunitymedicineevaluationofadherencetostrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystatement AT syedn crosssectionalstudiespublishedinindianjournalofcommunitymedicineevaluationofadherencetostrengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologystatement |