Cargando…

Is the burden of oral diseases higher in urban disadvantaged community compared to the national prevalence?

BACKGROUND: The urban low income has often been assumed to have the greatest dental treatment needs compared to the general population. However, no studies have been carried out to verify these assumptions. This study was conducted to assess whether there was any difference between the treatment nee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaafar, Nasruddin, Hakim, Hina, Mohd Nor, Nor Azlida, Mohamed, Asma, Saub, Roslan, Esa, Rashidah, Doss, Jennifer, Mohd Yusof, Zamros Yuzadi, Ab-Murat, Norintan, Abu Kassim, Noor Lide, Majid, Hazreen Abdul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25438162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-S3-S2
_version_ 1782347004793323520
author Jaafar, Nasruddin
Hakim, Hina
Mohd Nor, Nor Azlida
Mohamed, Asma
Saub, Roslan
Esa, Rashidah
Doss, Jennifer
Mohd Yusof, Zamros Yuzadi
Ab-Murat, Norintan
Abu Kassim, Noor Lide
Majid, Hazreen Abdul
author_facet Jaafar, Nasruddin
Hakim, Hina
Mohd Nor, Nor Azlida
Mohamed, Asma
Saub, Roslan
Esa, Rashidah
Doss, Jennifer
Mohd Yusof, Zamros Yuzadi
Ab-Murat, Norintan
Abu Kassim, Noor Lide
Majid, Hazreen Abdul
author_sort Jaafar, Nasruddin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The urban low income has often been assumed to have the greatest dental treatment needs compared to the general population. However, no studies have been carried out to verify these assumptions. This study was conducted to assess whether there was any difference between the treatment needs of an urban poor population as compared to the general population in order to design an intervention programme for this community. METHODS: A random sampling of living quarters (households) in the selected areas was done. 586 adults over 19 years old living in these households were clinically examined using World Health Organization (WHO) Oral Health Survey criteria 4th edition (1997). RESULTS: The overall prevalence of dental caries, periodontal disease, denture wearers and temporomandibular joint problems were 70.5%, 97.1%, 16.7% and 26%, respectively. The majority (80.5%) needed some form of dental treatment. The highest treatment needs were found in the oldest age group while the lowest were in the youngest group (19-29 years) (p = 0.000). The most prevalent periodontal problem was calculus; regardless of gender, ethnicity and age. Significantly more females (20.5%) wore prosthesis than males (11.1%) (p = 0.003). Prosthetic status and need significantly increased with age (p = 0.000). About one in four adults had Temporo-Mandibular Joint (TMJ) problems. Overall, it was surprising to note that the oral disease burden related to caries, prosthetic status and treatment need were lower in this population as compared to the national average (NOHSA, 2010). However, their periodontal disease status and treatment needs were higher compared to the national average indicating a poor oral hygiene standard. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence does not show that the overall oral disease burden and treatment needs in this urban disadvantaged adult population as higher than the national average, except for periodontal disease. The older age groups and elderly were identified as the most in need for oral health intervention and promotion. An integrated health intervention programme through a multisectoral common risk factor approach in collaboration with the Faculties of Medicine, Dentistry and other agencies is needed for the identified target group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4251127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42511272014-12-04 Is the burden of oral diseases higher in urban disadvantaged community compared to the national prevalence? Jaafar, Nasruddin Hakim, Hina Mohd Nor, Nor Azlida Mohamed, Asma Saub, Roslan Esa, Rashidah Doss, Jennifer Mohd Yusof, Zamros Yuzadi Ab-Murat, Norintan Abu Kassim, Noor Lide Majid, Hazreen Abdul BMC Public Health Proceedings BACKGROUND: The urban low income has often been assumed to have the greatest dental treatment needs compared to the general population. However, no studies have been carried out to verify these assumptions. This study was conducted to assess whether there was any difference between the treatment needs of an urban poor population as compared to the general population in order to design an intervention programme for this community. METHODS: A random sampling of living quarters (households) in the selected areas was done. 586 adults over 19 years old living in these households were clinically examined using World Health Organization (WHO) Oral Health Survey criteria 4th edition (1997). RESULTS: The overall prevalence of dental caries, periodontal disease, denture wearers and temporomandibular joint problems were 70.5%, 97.1%, 16.7% and 26%, respectively. The majority (80.5%) needed some form of dental treatment. The highest treatment needs were found in the oldest age group while the lowest were in the youngest group (19-29 years) (p = 0.000). The most prevalent periodontal problem was calculus; regardless of gender, ethnicity and age. Significantly more females (20.5%) wore prosthesis than males (11.1%) (p = 0.003). Prosthetic status and need significantly increased with age (p = 0.000). About one in four adults had Temporo-Mandibular Joint (TMJ) problems. Overall, it was surprising to note that the oral disease burden related to caries, prosthetic status and treatment need were lower in this population as compared to the national average (NOHSA, 2010). However, their periodontal disease status and treatment needs were higher compared to the national average indicating a poor oral hygiene standard. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence does not show that the overall oral disease burden and treatment needs in this urban disadvantaged adult population as higher than the national average, except for periodontal disease. The older age groups and elderly were identified as the most in need for oral health intervention and promotion. An integrated health intervention programme through a multisectoral common risk factor approach in collaboration with the Faculties of Medicine, Dentistry and other agencies is needed for the identified target group. BioMed Central 2014-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4251127/ /pubmed/25438162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-S3-S2 Text en Copyright © 2014 Jaafar et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Proceedings
Jaafar, Nasruddin
Hakim, Hina
Mohd Nor, Nor Azlida
Mohamed, Asma
Saub, Roslan
Esa, Rashidah
Doss, Jennifer
Mohd Yusof, Zamros Yuzadi
Ab-Murat, Norintan
Abu Kassim, Noor Lide
Majid, Hazreen Abdul
Is the burden of oral diseases higher in urban disadvantaged community compared to the national prevalence?
title Is the burden of oral diseases higher in urban disadvantaged community compared to the national prevalence?
title_full Is the burden of oral diseases higher in urban disadvantaged community compared to the national prevalence?
title_fullStr Is the burden of oral diseases higher in urban disadvantaged community compared to the national prevalence?
title_full_unstemmed Is the burden of oral diseases higher in urban disadvantaged community compared to the national prevalence?
title_short Is the burden of oral diseases higher in urban disadvantaged community compared to the national prevalence?
title_sort is the burden of oral diseases higher in urban disadvantaged community compared to the national prevalence?
topic Proceedings
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25438162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-S3-S2
work_keys_str_mv AT jaafarnasruddin istheburdenoforaldiseaseshigherinurbandisadvantagedcommunitycomparedtothenationalprevalence
AT hakimhina istheburdenoforaldiseaseshigherinurbandisadvantagedcommunitycomparedtothenationalprevalence
AT mohdnornorazlida istheburdenoforaldiseaseshigherinurbandisadvantagedcommunitycomparedtothenationalprevalence
AT mohamedasma istheburdenoforaldiseaseshigherinurbandisadvantagedcommunitycomparedtothenationalprevalence
AT saubroslan istheburdenoforaldiseaseshigherinurbandisadvantagedcommunitycomparedtothenationalprevalence
AT esarashidah istheburdenoforaldiseaseshigherinurbandisadvantagedcommunitycomparedtothenationalprevalence
AT dossjennifer istheburdenoforaldiseaseshigherinurbandisadvantagedcommunitycomparedtothenationalprevalence
AT mohdyusofzamrosyuzadi istheburdenoforaldiseaseshigherinurbandisadvantagedcommunitycomparedtothenationalprevalence
AT abmuratnorintan istheburdenoforaldiseaseshigherinurbandisadvantagedcommunitycomparedtothenationalprevalence
AT abukassimnoorlide istheburdenoforaldiseaseshigherinurbandisadvantagedcommunitycomparedtothenationalprevalence
AT majidhazreenabdul istheburdenoforaldiseaseshigherinurbandisadvantagedcommunitycomparedtothenationalprevalence