Cargando…

Improving recognition of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a retrospective case note review

BACKGROUND: Over the last 30 years, there has been little improvement in the age of diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) (mean age of 4.5–4.11 years). AIM: To review the diagnostic process for DMD in boys without a family history in order to identify where delays occur and suggest areas fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Ruiten, Henriette J A, Straub, Volker, Bushby, Kate, Guglieri, Michela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25187493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306366
_version_ 1782347009678639104
author van Ruiten, Henriette J A
Straub, Volker
Bushby, Kate
Guglieri, Michela
author_facet van Ruiten, Henriette J A
Straub, Volker
Bushby, Kate
Guglieri, Michela
author_sort van Ruiten, Henriette J A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the last 30 years, there has been little improvement in the age of diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) (mean age of 4.5–4.11 years). AIM: To review the diagnostic process for DMD in boys without a family history in order to identify where delays occur and suggest areas for improvement. DESIGN: A retrospective case note review. SETTING: A tertiary centre for neuromuscular diseases in England. PATIENTS: All boys without family history diagnosed with DMD in the last 10 years (n=20). OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean age at four key steps in the diagnostic pathway of DMD. RESULTS: (1) Age at first reported symptoms of DMD was 32.5 (8–72) months (2.7 years). (2) First engagement of a healthcare professional was at 42.9 (10–90) months. (3) Creatine kinase (CK) levels were checked at 50.1 (14–91) months. (4) Diagnosis of DMD was confirmed at 51.7 (16–91) months (4.3 years). The total delay from parental concern to diagnosis was 19.2 (4–50) months (1.6 years). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows an improvement in the age of diagnosis of DMD although there continues to be a delay in presentation to a health professional and a delay in obtaining a CK test. To reduce these delays, we propose screening for DMD as part of the Child Health Surveillance Programme, in addition to lowering the threshold for CK testing in primary care by promoting a new DMD mnemonic MUSCLE. An earlier diagnosis of DMD will allow timely access to genetic counselling, standards of care and clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4251173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42511732014-12-04 Improving recognition of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a retrospective case note review van Ruiten, Henriette J A Straub, Volker Bushby, Kate Guglieri, Michela Arch Dis Child Original Article BACKGROUND: Over the last 30 years, there has been little improvement in the age of diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) (mean age of 4.5–4.11 years). AIM: To review the diagnostic process for DMD in boys without a family history in order to identify where delays occur and suggest areas for improvement. DESIGN: A retrospective case note review. SETTING: A tertiary centre for neuromuscular diseases in England. PATIENTS: All boys without family history diagnosed with DMD in the last 10 years (n=20). OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean age at four key steps in the diagnostic pathway of DMD. RESULTS: (1) Age at first reported symptoms of DMD was 32.5 (8–72) months (2.7 years). (2) First engagement of a healthcare professional was at 42.9 (10–90) months. (3) Creatine kinase (CK) levels were checked at 50.1 (14–91) months. (4) Diagnosis of DMD was confirmed at 51.7 (16–91) months (4.3 years). The total delay from parental concern to diagnosis was 19.2 (4–50) months (1.6 years). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows an improvement in the age of diagnosis of DMD although there continues to be a delay in presentation to a health professional and a delay in obtaining a CK test. To reduce these delays, we propose screening for DMD as part of the Child Health Surveillance Programme, in addition to lowering the threshold for CK testing in primary care by promoting a new DMD mnemonic MUSCLE. An earlier diagnosis of DMD will allow timely access to genetic counselling, standards of care and clinical trials. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-12 2014-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4251173/ /pubmed/25187493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306366 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
van Ruiten, Henriette J A
Straub, Volker
Bushby, Kate
Guglieri, Michela
Improving recognition of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a retrospective case note review
title Improving recognition of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a retrospective case note review
title_full Improving recognition of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a retrospective case note review
title_fullStr Improving recognition of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a retrospective case note review
title_full_unstemmed Improving recognition of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a retrospective case note review
title_short Improving recognition of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a retrospective case note review
title_sort improving recognition of duchenne muscular dystrophy: a retrospective case note review
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25187493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306366
work_keys_str_mv AT vanruitenhenrietteja improvingrecognitionofduchennemusculardystrophyaretrospectivecasenotereview
AT straubvolker improvingrecognitionofduchennemusculardystrophyaretrospectivecasenotereview
AT bushbykate improvingrecognitionofduchennemusculardystrophyaretrospectivecasenotereview
AT guglierimichela improvingrecognitionofduchennemusculardystrophyaretrospectivecasenotereview