Cargando…

Intimate Partner Violence. The gynaecologist’s perspective

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is an important public health problem, which has been extensively studied all over the world, yet Belgian data are limited. IPV remains a taboo resulting in denial and underreporting. For an obstetrician-gynaecologist (OB/GYN), IPV, committed by a male partner to a wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roelens, K., Verstraelen, H., Temmerman, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universa Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25478074
_version_ 1782347029904621568
author Roelens, K.
Verstraelen, H.
Temmerman, M.
author_facet Roelens, K.
Verstraelen, H.
Temmerman, M.
author_sort Roelens, K.
collection PubMed
description Intimate partner violence (IPV) is an important public health problem, which has been extensively studied all over the world, yet Belgian data are limited. IPV remains a taboo resulting in denial and underreporting. For an obstetrician-gynaecologist (OB/GYN), IPV, committed by a male partner to a woman, is of particular interest, because of its negative impact on women’s and children’s health. In Belgium there are few data on IPV and guidelines for OB/GYN are missing. In a multi-centered survey surveillance study which was carried out among pregnant women attending 5 large hospitals in the province of East Flanders, the lifetime prevalence of IPV was estimated to be 10.1% and the period prevalence during pregnancy and/or in the year preceding pregnancy 3.4%. In our highly medicalised society, only 19.2% and 6.6% of the victims of physical and sexual abuse respectively sought medical care. Routine screening for IPV by a general practitioner or OB/GYN was found to be largely acceptable. In a questionnaire-based Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice survey among OB/GYN in Flanders, OB/GYN prove unfamiliar with IPV and largely underestimate the extent of the problem. Merely 6.8% of the respondents ever received any education on IPV. They refute the incentive of universal screening, even during pregnancy and one of the major barriers is fear of offending patients. Physician education was found to be the strongest predictor of a positive attitude towards screening and of current screening practices. Hence, there is a definite need to improve women’s awareness regarding abuse and to endorse physician training on IPV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4251275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Universa Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42512752014-12-04 Intimate Partner Violence. The gynaecologist’s perspective Roelens, K. Verstraelen, H. Temmerman, M. Facts Views Vis Obgyn PhD Summary Intimate partner violence (IPV) is an important public health problem, which has been extensively studied all over the world, yet Belgian data are limited. IPV remains a taboo resulting in denial and underreporting. For an obstetrician-gynaecologist (OB/GYN), IPV, committed by a male partner to a woman, is of particular interest, because of its negative impact on women’s and children’s health. In Belgium there are few data on IPV and guidelines for OB/GYN are missing. In a multi-centered survey surveillance study which was carried out among pregnant women attending 5 large hospitals in the province of East Flanders, the lifetime prevalence of IPV was estimated to be 10.1% and the period prevalence during pregnancy and/or in the year preceding pregnancy 3.4%. In our highly medicalised society, only 19.2% and 6.6% of the victims of physical and sexual abuse respectively sought medical care. Routine screening for IPV by a general practitioner or OB/GYN was found to be largely acceptable. In a questionnaire-based Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice survey among OB/GYN in Flanders, OB/GYN prove unfamiliar with IPV and largely underestimate the extent of the problem. Merely 6.8% of the respondents ever received any education on IPV. They refute the incentive of universal screening, even during pregnancy and one of the major barriers is fear of offending patients. Physician education was found to be the strongest predictor of a positive attitude towards screening and of current screening practices. Hence, there is a definite need to improve women’s awareness regarding abuse and to endorse physician training on IPV. Universa Press 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC4251275/ /pubmed/25478074 Text en Copyright: © 2009 Facts, Views & Vision http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle PhD Summary
Roelens, K.
Verstraelen, H.
Temmerman, M.
Intimate Partner Violence. The gynaecologist’s perspective
title Intimate Partner Violence. The gynaecologist’s perspective
title_full Intimate Partner Violence. The gynaecologist’s perspective
title_fullStr Intimate Partner Violence. The gynaecologist’s perspective
title_full_unstemmed Intimate Partner Violence. The gynaecologist’s perspective
title_short Intimate Partner Violence. The gynaecologist’s perspective
title_sort intimate partner violence. the gynaecologist’s perspective
topic PhD Summary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25478074
work_keys_str_mv AT roelensk intimatepartnerviolencethegynaecologistsperspective
AT verstraelenh intimatepartnerviolencethegynaecologistsperspective
AT temmermanm intimatepartnerviolencethegynaecologistsperspective