Cargando…
BP-C1 in the treatment of patients with stage IV breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study and an additional open-label treatment phase
The aims were to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a new benzene-poly-carboxylic acids complex with cis-diammineplatinum (II) dichloride (BP-C1) versus placebo and to investigate the long-term tolerability of BP-C1 in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHO...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25473312 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S71781 |
_version_ | 1782347066060570624 |
---|---|
author | Larsen, Stig Butthongkomvong, Kritiya Manikhas, Alexey Trishkina, Ekaterina Poddubuskaya, Elena Matrosova, Marina Srimuninnimit, Vichien Lindkær-Jensen, Steen |
author_facet | Larsen, Stig Butthongkomvong, Kritiya Manikhas, Alexey Trishkina, Ekaterina Poddubuskaya, Elena Matrosova, Marina Srimuninnimit, Vichien Lindkær-Jensen, Steen |
author_sort | Larsen, Stig |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aims were to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a new benzene-poly-carboxylic acids complex with cis-diammineplatinum (II) dichloride (BP-C1) versus placebo and to investigate the long-term tolerability of BP-C1 in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study was performed with a semi-crossover design. Patients allocated to placebo switched to BP-C1 after 32 days of treatment. Patients who completed 32 days of BP-C1 treatment were offered the opportunity to continue on BP-C1 for an additional 32 days in an open-label extension. Patients were then followed up for another 28 days. Thirty patients were given daily intramuscular injections of 0.035 mg/kg of body weight BP-C1 or placebo for 32 days. Biochemistry, hematology, National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTC-NCI), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (QOL-C30 and the breast-cancer–specific BR23) data were recorded at screening and after every 16 days of treatment. Computed tomography was performed at screening and every 32 days. RESULTS: The sum of target lesions increased 2.4% in the BP-C1 group and 14.3% in the placebo group. Only the increase in the placebo group was significant (P=0.013). The difference between the groups was significant in favor of BP-C1 (P=0.04). There was a significant difference (P=0.026) in favor of BP-C1 regarding Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) classification. The sum of lesions increased slightly in the patients receiving 64 days of continuous BP-C1 treatment, of whom 68.4% were classified as responders. The sum CTC-NCI toxicity score increased nonsignificantly in the BP-C1 group but significantly in the placebo group (P=0.05). The difference in increase between groups did not meet the level of significance (P=0.12). The sum toxicity score was reduced in the patients receiving 64 days of BP-C1 from 9.2 at screening to 8.9 at Day 48, but it increased again to 10.1 by Day 64 and 10.6 during the 28-day follow-up. “Breast cancer-related pain and discomfort” and “Breast cancer treatment problem last week” were significantly reduced (P=0.02) in the BP-C1 group but increased slightly in the placebo group; between-group differences were significant in favor of BP-C1 (P=0.05). “Breast cancer related pain and discomfort”, “Breast cancer treatment problem last week,” and “Physical activity problem” were significantly reduced during the 64 days of BP-C1 treatment (P≤0.05). CONCLUSION: For patients suffering from stage IV metastatic breast cancer, treatment with BP-C1 reduces cancer growth, is well tolerated, improves quality of life, and produces few adverse events, which were mainly mild and manageable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4251531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42515312014-12-03 BP-C1 in the treatment of patients with stage IV breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study and an additional open-label treatment phase Larsen, Stig Butthongkomvong, Kritiya Manikhas, Alexey Trishkina, Ekaterina Poddubuskaya, Elena Matrosova, Marina Srimuninnimit, Vichien Lindkær-Jensen, Steen Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) Original Research The aims were to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a new benzene-poly-carboxylic acids complex with cis-diammineplatinum (II) dichloride (BP-C1) versus placebo and to investigate the long-term tolerability of BP-C1 in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study was performed with a semi-crossover design. Patients allocated to placebo switched to BP-C1 after 32 days of treatment. Patients who completed 32 days of BP-C1 treatment were offered the opportunity to continue on BP-C1 for an additional 32 days in an open-label extension. Patients were then followed up for another 28 days. Thirty patients were given daily intramuscular injections of 0.035 mg/kg of body weight BP-C1 or placebo for 32 days. Biochemistry, hematology, National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTC-NCI), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (QOL-C30 and the breast-cancer–specific BR23) data were recorded at screening and after every 16 days of treatment. Computed tomography was performed at screening and every 32 days. RESULTS: The sum of target lesions increased 2.4% in the BP-C1 group and 14.3% in the placebo group. Only the increase in the placebo group was significant (P=0.013). The difference between the groups was significant in favor of BP-C1 (P=0.04). There was a significant difference (P=0.026) in favor of BP-C1 regarding Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) classification. The sum of lesions increased slightly in the patients receiving 64 days of continuous BP-C1 treatment, of whom 68.4% were classified as responders. The sum CTC-NCI toxicity score increased nonsignificantly in the BP-C1 group but significantly in the placebo group (P=0.05). The difference in increase between groups did not meet the level of significance (P=0.12). The sum toxicity score was reduced in the patients receiving 64 days of BP-C1 from 9.2 at screening to 8.9 at Day 48, but it increased again to 10.1 by Day 64 and 10.6 during the 28-day follow-up. “Breast cancer-related pain and discomfort” and “Breast cancer treatment problem last week” were significantly reduced (P=0.02) in the BP-C1 group but increased slightly in the placebo group; between-group differences were significant in favor of BP-C1 (P=0.05). “Breast cancer related pain and discomfort”, “Breast cancer treatment problem last week,” and “Physical activity problem” were significantly reduced during the 64 days of BP-C1 treatment (P≤0.05). CONCLUSION: For patients suffering from stage IV metastatic breast cancer, treatment with BP-C1 reduces cancer growth, is well tolerated, improves quality of life, and produces few adverse events, which were mainly mild and manageable. Dove Medical Press 2014-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4251531/ /pubmed/25473312 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S71781 Text en © 2014 Larsen et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Larsen, Stig Butthongkomvong, Kritiya Manikhas, Alexey Trishkina, Ekaterina Poddubuskaya, Elena Matrosova, Marina Srimuninnimit, Vichien Lindkær-Jensen, Steen BP-C1 in the treatment of patients with stage IV breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study and an additional open-label treatment phase |
title | BP-C1 in the treatment of patients with stage IV breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study and an additional open-label treatment phase |
title_full | BP-C1 in the treatment of patients with stage IV breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study and an additional open-label treatment phase |
title_fullStr | BP-C1 in the treatment of patients with stage IV breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study and an additional open-label treatment phase |
title_full_unstemmed | BP-C1 in the treatment of patients with stage IV breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study and an additional open-label treatment phase |
title_short | BP-C1 in the treatment of patients with stage IV breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study and an additional open-label treatment phase |
title_sort | bp-c1 in the treatment of patients with stage iv breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study and an additional open-label treatment phase |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25473312 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S71781 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT larsenstig bpc1inthetreatmentofpatientswithstageivbreastcancerarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledmulticenterstudyandanadditionalopenlabeltreatmentphase AT butthongkomvongkritiya bpc1inthetreatmentofpatientswithstageivbreastcancerarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledmulticenterstudyandanadditionalopenlabeltreatmentphase AT manikhasalexey bpc1inthetreatmentofpatientswithstageivbreastcancerarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledmulticenterstudyandanadditionalopenlabeltreatmentphase AT trishkinaekaterina bpc1inthetreatmentofpatientswithstageivbreastcancerarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledmulticenterstudyandanadditionalopenlabeltreatmentphase AT poddubuskayaelena bpc1inthetreatmentofpatientswithstageivbreastcancerarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledmulticenterstudyandanadditionalopenlabeltreatmentphase AT matrosovamarina bpc1inthetreatmentofpatientswithstageivbreastcancerarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledmulticenterstudyandanadditionalopenlabeltreatmentphase AT srimuninnimitvichien bpc1inthetreatmentofpatientswithstageivbreastcancerarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledmulticenterstudyandanadditionalopenlabeltreatmentphase AT lindkærjensensteen bpc1inthetreatmentofpatientswithstageivbreastcancerarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledmulticenterstudyandanadditionalopenlabeltreatmentphase |