Cargando…

Cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity of gold-supported cerium oxide nanoparticles

BACKGROUND: Cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO(2)) have been shown to be a novel therapeutic in many biomedical applications. Gold (Au) nanoparticles have also attracted widespread interest due to their chemical stability and unique optical properties. Thus, decorating Au on CeO(2) nanoparticles would...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suresh Babu, K, Anandkumar, M, Tsai, TY, Kao, TH, Stephen Inbaraj, B, Chen, BH
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25473288
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S70087
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO(2)) have been shown to be a novel therapeutic in many biomedical applications. Gold (Au) nanoparticles have also attracted widespread interest due to their chemical stability and unique optical properties. Thus, decorating Au on CeO(2) nanoparticles would have potential for exploitation in the biomedical field. METHODS: In the present work, CeO(2) nanoparticles synthesized by a chemical combustion method were supported with 3.5% Au (Au/CeO(2)) by a deposition-precipitation method. The as-synthesized Au, CeO(2), and Au/CeO(2) nanoparticles were evaluated for antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity in RAW 264.7 normal cells and A549 lung cancer cells. RESULTS: The as-synthesized nanoparticles were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning and transmission electron microscopy, and ultraviolet-visible measurements. The X-ray diffraction study confirmed the formation of cubic fluorite-structured CeO(2) nanoparticles with a size of 10 nm. All synthesized nanoparticles were nontoxic towards RAW 264.7 cells at doses of 0–1,000 μM except for Au at >100 μM. For A549 cancer cells, Au/CeO(2) had the highest inhibitory effect, followed by both Au and CeO(2) which showed a similar effect at 500 and 1,000 μM. Initial binding of nanoparticles occurred through localized positively charged sites in A549 cells as shown by a shift in zeta potential from positive to negative after 24 hours of incubation. A dose-dependent elevation in reactive oxygen species indicated that the pro-oxidant activity of the nanoparticles was responsible for their cytotoxicity towards A549 cells. In addition, cellular uptake seen on transmission electron microscopic images indicated predominant localization of nanoparticles in the cytoplasmic matrix and mitochondrial damage due to oxidative stress. With regard to antibacterial activity, both types of nanoparticles had the strongest inhibitory effect on Bacillus subtilis in monoculture systems, followed by Salmonella enteritidis, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus, while, in coculture tests with Lactobacillus plantarum, S. aureus was inhibited to a greater extent than the other bacteria. CONCLUSION: Gold-supported CeO(2) nanoparticles may be a potential nanomaterial for in vivo application owing to their biocompatible and antibacterial properties.