Cargando…
Implementing effective hygiene promotion: lessons from the process evaluation of an intervention to promote handwashing with soap in rural India
BACKGROUND: An intervention trial of the ‘SuperAmma’ village-level intervention to promote handwashing with soap (HWWS) in rural India demonstrated substantial increases in HWWS amongst the target population. We carried out a process evaluation to assess the implementation of the intervention and th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1179 |
_version_ | 1782347082851418112 |
---|---|
author | Rajaraman, Divya Varadharajan, Kiruba Sankar Greenland, Katie Curtis, Val Kumar, Raja Schmidt, Wolf-Peter Aunger, Robert Biran, Adam |
author_facet | Rajaraman, Divya Varadharajan, Kiruba Sankar Greenland, Katie Curtis, Val Kumar, Raja Schmidt, Wolf-Peter Aunger, Robert Biran, Adam |
author_sort | Rajaraman, Divya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An intervention trial of the ‘SuperAmma’ village-level intervention to promote handwashing with soap (HWWS) in rural India demonstrated substantial increases in HWWS amongst the target population. We carried out a process evaluation to assess the implementation of the intervention and the evidence that it had changed the perceived benefits and social norms associated with HWWS. The evaluation also aimed to inform the design of a streamlined shorter intervention and estimate scale up costs. METHODS: Intervention implementation was observed in 7 villages. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the implementation team, village leaders and representatives of the target population. A questionnaire survey was administered in 174 households in intervention villages and 171 households in control villages to assess exposure to intervention activities, recall of intervention components and evidence that the intervention had produced changes in perceptions that were consistent with the intervention core messages. Costs were estimated for the intervention as delivered, as well as for a hypothetical scale-up to 1,000 villages. RESULTS: We found that the intervention was largely acceptable to the target population, maintained high fidelity (after some starting problems), and resulted in a high level of exposure to most components. There was a high recall of most intervention activities. Subjects in the intervention villages were more likely than those in control villages to cite reasons for HWWS that were in line with intervention messaging and to believe that HWWS was a social norm. There were no major differences between socio-economic and caste groups in exposure to intervention activities. Reducing the intervention from 4 to 2 contact days, in a scale up scenario, cut the estimated implementation cost from $2,293 to $1,097 per village. CONCLUSIONS: The SuperAmma intervention is capable of achieving good reach across men and women of varied social and economic status, is affordable, and has the potential to be effective at scale, provided that sufficient attention is given to ensuring the quality of intervention delivery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4251686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42516862014-12-03 Implementing effective hygiene promotion: lessons from the process evaluation of an intervention to promote handwashing with soap in rural India Rajaraman, Divya Varadharajan, Kiruba Sankar Greenland, Katie Curtis, Val Kumar, Raja Schmidt, Wolf-Peter Aunger, Robert Biran, Adam BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: An intervention trial of the ‘SuperAmma’ village-level intervention to promote handwashing with soap (HWWS) in rural India demonstrated substantial increases in HWWS amongst the target population. We carried out a process evaluation to assess the implementation of the intervention and the evidence that it had changed the perceived benefits and social norms associated with HWWS. The evaluation also aimed to inform the design of a streamlined shorter intervention and estimate scale up costs. METHODS: Intervention implementation was observed in 7 villages. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the implementation team, village leaders and representatives of the target population. A questionnaire survey was administered in 174 households in intervention villages and 171 households in control villages to assess exposure to intervention activities, recall of intervention components and evidence that the intervention had produced changes in perceptions that were consistent with the intervention core messages. Costs were estimated for the intervention as delivered, as well as for a hypothetical scale-up to 1,000 villages. RESULTS: We found that the intervention was largely acceptable to the target population, maintained high fidelity (after some starting problems), and resulted in a high level of exposure to most components. There was a high recall of most intervention activities. Subjects in the intervention villages were more likely than those in control villages to cite reasons for HWWS that were in line with intervention messaging and to believe that HWWS was a social norm. There were no major differences between socio-economic and caste groups in exposure to intervention activities. Reducing the intervention from 4 to 2 contact days, in a scale up scenario, cut the estimated implementation cost from $2,293 to $1,097 per village. CONCLUSIONS: The SuperAmma intervention is capable of achieving good reach across men and women of varied social and economic status, is affordable, and has the potential to be effective at scale, provided that sufficient attention is given to ensuring the quality of intervention delivery. BioMed Central 2014-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4251686/ /pubmed/25407695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1179 Text en © Rajaraman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rajaraman, Divya Varadharajan, Kiruba Sankar Greenland, Katie Curtis, Val Kumar, Raja Schmidt, Wolf-Peter Aunger, Robert Biran, Adam Implementing effective hygiene promotion: lessons from the process evaluation of an intervention to promote handwashing with soap in rural India |
title | Implementing effective hygiene promotion: lessons from the process evaluation of an intervention to promote handwashing with soap in rural India |
title_full | Implementing effective hygiene promotion: lessons from the process evaluation of an intervention to promote handwashing with soap in rural India |
title_fullStr | Implementing effective hygiene promotion: lessons from the process evaluation of an intervention to promote handwashing with soap in rural India |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing effective hygiene promotion: lessons from the process evaluation of an intervention to promote handwashing with soap in rural India |
title_short | Implementing effective hygiene promotion: lessons from the process evaluation of an intervention to promote handwashing with soap in rural India |
title_sort | implementing effective hygiene promotion: lessons from the process evaluation of an intervention to promote handwashing with soap in rural india |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1179 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajaramandivya implementingeffectivehygienepromotionlessonsfromtheprocessevaluationofaninterventiontopromotehandwashingwithsoapinruralindia AT varadharajankirubasankar implementingeffectivehygienepromotionlessonsfromtheprocessevaluationofaninterventiontopromotehandwashingwithsoapinruralindia AT greenlandkatie implementingeffectivehygienepromotionlessonsfromtheprocessevaluationofaninterventiontopromotehandwashingwithsoapinruralindia AT curtisval implementingeffectivehygienepromotionlessonsfromtheprocessevaluationofaninterventiontopromotehandwashingwithsoapinruralindia AT kumarraja implementingeffectivehygienepromotionlessonsfromtheprocessevaluationofaninterventiontopromotehandwashingwithsoapinruralindia AT schmidtwolfpeter implementingeffectivehygienepromotionlessonsfromtheprocessevaluationofaninterventiontopromotehandwashingwithsoapinruralindia AT aungerrobert implementingeffectivehygienepromotionlessonsfromtheprocessevaluationofaninterventiontopromotehandwashingwithsoapinruralindia AT biranadam implementingeffectivehygienepromotionlessonsfromtheprocessevaluationofaninterventiontopromotehandwashingwithsoapinruralindia |