Cargando…

Tensile Mechanical Properties of Swine Cortical Mandibular Bone

Temporary orthodontic mini implants serve as anchorage devices in orthodontic treatments. Often, they are inserted in the jaw bones, between the roots of the teeth. The stability of the mini implants within the bone is one of the major factors affecting their success and, consequently, that of the o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brosh, Tamar, Rozitsky, Doron, Geron, Silvia, Pilo, Raphael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25463971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113229
_version_ 1782347125220179968
author Brosh, Tamar
Rozitsky, Doron
Geron, Silvia
Pilo, Raphael
author_facet Brosh, Tamar
Rozitsky, Doron
Geron, Silvia
Pilo, Raphael
author_sort Brosh, Tamar
collection PubMed
description Temporary orthodontic mini implants serve as anchorage devices in orthodontic treatments. Often, they are inserted in the jaw bones, between the roots of the teeth. The stability of the mini implants within the bone is one of the major factors affecting their success and, consequently, that of the orthodontic treatment. Bone mechanical properties are important for implant stability. The aim of this study was to determine the tensile properties of the alveolar and basal mandible bones in a swine model. The diametral compression test was employed to study the properties in two orthogonal directions: mesio-distal and occluso-gingival. Small cylindrical cortical bone specimens (2.6 mm diameter, 1.5 mm thickness) were obtained from 7 mandibles using a trephine drill. The sites included different locations (anterior and posterior) and aspects (buccal and lingual) for a total of 16 specimens from each mandible. The load-displacement curves were continuously monitored while loading half of the specimens in the oclluso-gingival direction and half in the mesio-distal direction. The stiffness was calculated from the linear portion of the curve. The mesio-distal direction was 31% stiffer than the occluso-gingival direction. The basal bone was 40% stiffer than the alveolar bone. The posterior zone was 46% stiffer than the anterior zone. The lingual aspect was stiffer than the buccal aspect. Although bone specimens do not behave as brittle materials, the diametral compression test can be adequately used for determining tensile behavior when only small bone specimens can be obtained. In conclusion, to obtain maximal orthodontic mini implant stability, the force components on the implants should be oriented mostly in the mesio-distal direction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4251974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42519742014-12-05 Tensile Mechanical Properties of Swine Cortical Mandibular Bone Brosh, Tamar Rozitsky, Doron Geron, Silvia Pilo, Raphael PLoS One Research Article Temporary orthodontic mini implants serve as anchorage devices in orthodontic treatments. Often, they are inserted in the jaw bones, between the roots of the teeth. The stability of the mini implants within the bone is one of the major factors affecting their success and, consequently, that of the orthodontic treatment. Bone mechanical properties are important for implant stability. The aim of this study was to determine the tensile properties of the alveolar and basal mandible bones in a swine model. The diametral compression test was employed to study the properties in two orthogonal directions: mesio-distal and occluso-gingival. Small cylindrical cortical bone specimens (2.6 mm diameter, 1.5 mm thickness) were obtained from 7 mandibles using a trephine drill. The sites included different locations (anterior and posterior) and aspects (buccal and lingual) for a total of 16 specimens from each mandible. The load-displacement curves were continuously monitored while loading half of the specimens in the oclluso-gingival direction and half in the mesio-distal direction. The stiffness was calculated from the linear portion of the curve. The mesio-distal direction was 31% stiffer than the occluso-gingival direction. The basal bone was 40% stiffer than the alveolar bone. The posterior zone was 46% stiffer than the anterior zone. The lingual aspect was stiffer than the buccal aspect. Although bone specimens do not behave as brittle materials, the diametral compression test can be adequately used for determining tensile behavior when only small bone specimens can be obtained. In conclusion, to obtain maximal orthodontic mini implant stability, the force components on the implants should be oriented mostly in the mesio-distal direction. Public Library of Science 2014-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4251974/ /pubmed/25463971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113229 Text en © 2014 Brosh et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brosh, Tamar
Rozitsky, Doron
Geron, Silvia
Pilo, Raphael
Tensile Mechanical Properties of Swine Cortical Mandibular Bone
title Tensile Mechanical Properties of Swine Cortical Mandibular Bone
title_full Tensile Mechanical Properties of Swine Cortical Mandibular Bone
title_fullStr Tensile Mechanical Properties of Swine Cortical Mandibular Bone
title_full_unstemmed Tensile Mechanical Properties of Swine Cortical Mandibular Bone
title_short Tensile Mechanical Properties of Swine Cortical Mandibular Bone
title_sort tensile mechanical properties of swine cortical mandibular bone
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4251974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25463971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113229
work_keys_str_mv AT broshtamar tensilemechanicalpropertiesofswinecorticalmandibularbone
AT rozitskydoron tensilemechanicalpropertiesofswinecorticalmandibularbone
AT geronsilvia tensilemechanicalpropertiesofswinecorticalmandibularbone
AT piloraphael tensilemechanicalpropertiesofswinecorticalmandibularbone