Cargando…

Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Chronic Lower Back Pain in Older Veterans: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION: Chronic lower back pain (CLBP) is problematic in older veterans. Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is commonly utilized for CLBP in older adults, yet there are few randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating SMT. METHODS: The purpose of the study was to compare the effectiveness of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dougherty, Paul E., Karuza, Jurgis, Dunn, Andrew S., Savino, Dorian, Katz, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4252156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26246937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151458514544956
_version_ 1782347162511736832
author Dougherty, Paul E.
Karuza, Jurgis
Dunn, Andrew S.
Savino, Dorian
Katz, Paul
author_facet Dougherty, Paul E.
Karuza, Jurgis
Dunn, Andrew S.
Savino, Dorian
Katz, Paul
author_sort Dougherty, Paul E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Chronic lower back pain (CLBP) is problematic in older veterans. Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is commonly utilized for CLBP in older adults, yet there are few randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating SMT. METHODS: The purpose of the study was to compare the effectiveness of SMT to a sham intervention on pain (Visual Analogue Scale, SF-36 pain subscale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and physical function (SF-36 subscale, Timed Up and Go) by performing a randomized placebo-controlled trial at 2 Veteran Affairs Clinics. RESULTS: Older veterans (≥ 65 years of age) who were naive to chiropractic were recruited. A total of 136 were included in the study with 69 being randomly assigned to SMT and 67 to sham intervention. Patients were treated 2 times per week for 4 weeks assessing outcomes at baseline, 5, and 12 weeks postbaseline. Both groups demonstrated significant decrease in pain and disability at 5 and 12 weeks. At 12 weeks, there was no significant difference in pain and a statistically significant decline in disability scores in the SMT group when compared to the sham intervention group. There were no significant differences in adverse events between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The SMT did not result in greater improvement in pain when compared to our sham intervention; however, SMT did demonstrate a slightly greater improvement in disability at 12 weeks. The fact that patients in both groups showed improvements suggests the presence of a nonspecific therapeutic effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4252156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42521562015-12-01 Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Chronic Lower Back Pain in Older Veterans: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial Dougherty, Paul E. Karuza, Jurgis Dunn, Andrew S. Savino, Dorian Katz, Paul Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Articles INTRODUCTION: Chronic lower back pain (CLBP) is problematic in older veterans. Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is commonly utilized for CLBP in older adults, yet there are few randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating SMT. METHODS: The purpose of the study was to compare the effectiveness of SMT to a sham intervention on pain (Visual Analogue Scale, SF-36 pain subscale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and physical function (SF-36 subscale, Timed Up and Go) by performing a randomized placebo-controlled trial at 2 Veteran Affairs Clinics. RESULTS: Older veterans (≥ 65 years of age) who were naive to chiropractic were recruited. A total of 136 were included in the study with 69 being randomly assigned to SMT and 67 to sham intervention. Patients were treated 2 times per week for 4 weeks assessing outcomes at baseline, 5, and 12 weeks postbaseline. Both groups demonstrated significant decrease in pain and disability at 5 and 12 weeks. At 12 weeks, there was no significant difference in pain and a statistically significant decline in disability scores in the SMT group when compared to the sham intervention group. There were no significant differences in adverse events between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The SMT did not result in greater improvement in pain when compared to our sham intervention; however, SMT did demonstrate a slightly greater improvement in disability at 12 weeks. The fact that patients in both groups showed improvements suggests the presence of a nonspecific therapeutic effect. SAGE Publications 2014-08-06 2014-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4252156/ /pubmed/26246937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151458514544956 Text en © The Author(s) 2014
spellingShingle Articles
Dougherty, Paul E.
Karuza, Jurgis
Dunn, Andrew S.
Savino, Dorian
Katz, Paul
Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Chronic Lower Back Pain in Older Veterans: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Chronic Lower Back Pain in Older Veterans: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_full Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Chronic Lower Back Pain in Older Veterans: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Chronic Lower Back Pain in Older Veterans: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Chronic Lower Back Pain in Older Veterans: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_short Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Chronic Lower Back Pain in Older Veterans: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_sort spinal manipulative therapy for chronic lower back pain in older veterans: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4252156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26246937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151458514544956
work_keys_str_mv AT doughertypaule spinalmanipulativetherapyforchroniclowerbackpaininolderveteransaprospectiverandomizedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT karuzajurgis spinalmanipulativetherapyforchroniclowerbackpaininolderveteransaprospectiverandomizedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT dunnandrews spinalmanipulativetherapyforchroniclowerbackpaininolderveteransaprospectiverandomizedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT savinodorian spinalmanipulativetherapyforchroniclowerbackpaininolderveteransaprospectiverandomizedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT katzpaul spinalmanipulativetherapyforchroniclowerbackpaininolderveteransaprospectiverandomizedplacebocontrolledtrial