Cargando…

Fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur: surgical management options and outcomes

PURPOSE: The management of proximal femoral deformity in fibrous dysplasia (FD) is a challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon. The purpose of this study was to analyze the various presentations of FD of proximal femur and the results of the various treatment modalities for the same. METHODS: This is a r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kushare, Indranil V., Colo, Dino, Bakhshi, Hooman, Dormans, John P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4252268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25409925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0625-9
_version_ 1782347166217404416
author Kushare, Indranil V.
Colo, Dino
Bakhshi, Hooman
Dormans, John P.
author_facet Kushare, Indranil V.
Colo, Dino
Bakhshi, Hooman
Dormans, John P.
author_sort Kushare, Indranil V.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The management of proximal femoral deformity in fibrous dysplasia (FD) is a challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon. The purpose of this study was to analyze the various presentations of FD of proximal femur and the results of the various treatment modalities for the same. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 23 patients (24 femora) with FD who underwent surgery for the proximal femur. The study sample included 14 males, nine females. Ten patients had a monostotic disease, eight patients had polyostotic disease, and five patients had McCune-Albright syndrome. RESULTS: Group 1: shepherd crook deformity—included five patients who underwent femoral neck osteotomy. Four patients had intramedullary (IM) nailing with neck cross-pinning and all patients showed union. One patient was stabilized with external fixation, which failed. Group 2: nine patients (ten femora) presented with frank pathological fracture. Nine underwent fixation with IM nailing, one with locking plate and screws. Three patients had to undergo more than one procedure and all fractures showed good union. Group 3: nine patients who presented with bone cyst and pain. All patients underwent biopsy; four of them had curettage with bone graft. CONCLUSION: Shepherd crook deformity can be treated by a well-planned osteotomy and fixation with intramedullary implants with neck cross-pinning. Frank pathological fractures fixation with an intramedullary nail has excellent results even if not accompanied by resolution of the fibrodysplastic lesion. More than one procedure may be required. External fixation is not an optimal choice for fixation of femoral osteotomies in FD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4252268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42522682014-12-05 Fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur: surgical management options and outcomes Kushare, Indranil V. Colo, Dino Bakhshi, Hooman Dormans, John P. J Child Orthop Original Clinical Article PURPOSE: The management of proximal femoral deformity in fibrous dysplasia (FD) is a challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon. The purpose of this study was to analyze the various presentations of FD of proximal femur and the results of the various treatment modalities for the same. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 23 patients (24 femora) with FD who underwent surgery for the proximal femur. The study sample included 14 males, nine females. Ten patients had a monostotic disease, eight patients had polyostotic disease, and five patients had McCune-Albright syndrome. RESULTS: Group 1: shepherd crook deformity—included five patients who underwent femoral neck osteotomy. Four patients had intramedullary (IM) nailing with neck cross-pinning and all patients showed union. One patient was stabilized with external fixation, which failed. Group 2: nine patients (ten femora) presented with frank pathological fracture. Nine underwent fixation with IM nailing, one with locking plate and screws. Three patients had to undergo more than one procedure and all fractures showed good union. Group 3: nine patients who presented with bone cyst and pain. All patients underwent biopsy; four of them had curettage with bone graft. CONCLUSION: Shepherd crook deformity can be treated by a well-planned osteotomy and fixation with intramedullary implants with neck cross-pinning. Frank pathological fractures fixation with an intramedullary nail has excellent results even if not accompanied by resolution of the fibrodysplastic lesion. More than one procedure may be required. External fixation is not an optimal choice for fixation of femoral osteotomies in FD. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-11-20 2014-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4252268/ /pubmed/25409925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0625-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Article
Kushare, Indranil V.
Colo, Dino
Bakhshi, Hooman
Dormans, John P.
Fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur: surgical management options and outcomes
title Fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur: surgical management options and outcomes
title_full Fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur: surgical management options and outcomes
title_fullStr Fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur: surgical management options and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur: surgical management options and outcomes
title_short Fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur: surgical management options and outcomes
title_sort fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur: surgical management options and outcomes
topic Original Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4252268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25409925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0625-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kushareindranilv fibrousdysplasiaoftheproximalfemursurgicalmanagementoptionsandoutcomes
AT colodino fibrousdysplasiaoftheproximalfemursurgicalmanagementoptionsandoutcomes
AT bakhshihooman fibrousdysplasiaoftheproximalfemursurgicalmanagementoptionsandoutcomes
AT dormansjohnp fibrousdysplasiaoftheproximalfemursurgicalmanagementoptionsandoutcomes