Cargando…
Fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur: surgical management options and outcomes
PURPOSE: The management of proximal femoral deformity in fibrous dysplasia (FD) is a challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon. The purpose of this study was to analyze the various presentations of FD of proximal femur and the results of the various treatment modalities for the same. METHODS: This is a r...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4252268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25409925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0625-9 |
_version_ | 1782347166217404416 |
---|---|
author | Kushare, Indranil V. Colo, Dino Bakhshi, Hooman Dormans, John P. |
author_facet | Kushare, Indranil V. Colo, Dino Bakhshi, Hooman Dormans, John P. |
author_sort | Kushare, Indranil V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The management of proximal femoral deformity in fibrous dysplasia (FD) is a challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon. The purpose of this study was to analyze the various presentations of FD of proximal femur and the results of the various treatment modalities for the same. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 23 patients (24 femora) with FD who underwent surgery for the proximal femur. The study sample included 14 males, nine females. Ten patients had a monostotic disease, eight patients had polyostotic disease, and five patients had McCune-Albright syndrome. RESULTS: Group 1: shepherd crook deformity—included five patients who underwent femoral neck osteotomy. Four patients had intramedullary (IM) nailing with neck cross-pinning and all patients showed union. One patient was stabilized with external fixation, which failed. Group 2: nine patients (ten femora) presented with frank pathological fracture. Nine underwent fixation with IM nailing, one with locking plate and screws. Three patients had to undergo more than one procedure and all fractures showed good union. Group 3: nine patients who presented with bone cyst and pain. All patients underwent biopsy; four of them had curettage with bone graft. CONCLUSION: Shepherd crook deformity can be treated by a well-planned osteotomy and fixation with intramedullary implants with neck cross-pinning. Frank pathological fractures fixation with an intramedullary nail has excellent results even if not accompanied by resolution of the fibrodysplastic lesion. More than one procedure may be required. External fixation is not an optimal choice for fixation of femoral osteotomies in FD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4252268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42522682014-12-05 Fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur: surgical management options and outcomes Kushare, Indranil V. Colo, Dino Bakhshi, Hooman Dormans, John P. J Child Orthop Original Clinical Article PURPOSE: The management of proximal femoral deformity in fibrous dysplasia (FD) is a challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon. The purpose of this study was to analyze the various presentations of FD of proximal femur and the results of the various treatment modalities for the same. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 23 patients (24 femora) with FD who underwent surgery for the proximal femur. The study sample included 14 males, nine females. Ten patients had a monostotic disease, eight patients had polyostotic disease, and five patients had McCune-Albright syndrome. RESULTS: Group 1: shepherd crook deformity—included five patients who underwent femoral neck osteotomy. Four patients had intramedullary (IM) nailing with neck cross-pinning and all patients showed union. One patient was stabilized with external fixation, which failed. Group 2: nine patients (ten femora) presented with frank pathological fracture. Nine underwent fixation with IM nailing, one with locking plate and screws. Three patients had to undergo more than one procedure and all fractures showed good union. Group 3: nine patients who presented with bone cyst and pain. All patients underwent biopsy; four of them had curettage with bone graft. CONCLUSION: Shepherd crook deformity can be treated by a well-planned osteotomy and fixation with intramedullary implants with neck cross-pinning. Frank pathological fractures fixation with an intramedullary nail has excellent results even if not accompanied by resolution of the fibrodysplastic lesion. More than one procedure may be required. External fixation is not an optimal choice for fixation of femoral osteotomies in FD. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-11-20 2014-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4252268/ /pubmed/25409925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0625-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Clinical Article Kushare, Indranil V. Colo, Dino Bakhshi, Hooman Dormans, John P. Fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur: surgical management options and outcomes |
title | Fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur: surgical management options and outcomes |
title_full | Fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur: surgical management options and outcomes |
title_fullStr | Fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur: surgical management options and outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur: surgical management options and outcomes |
title_short | Fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur: surgical management options and outcomes |
title_sort | fibrous dysplasia of the proximal femur: surgical management options and outcomes |
topic | Original Clinical Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4252268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25409925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0625-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kushareindranilv fibrousdysplasiaoftheproximalfemursurgicalmanagementoptionsandoutcomes AT colodino fibrousdysplasiaoftheproximalfemursurgicalmanagementoptionsandoutcomes AT bakhshihooman fibrousdysplasiaoftheproximalfemursurgicalmanagementoptionsandoutcomes AT dormansjohnp fibrousdysplasiaoftheproximalfemursurgicalmanagementoptionsandoutcomes |