Cargando…

An in-vitro evaluation of mechanical and esthetic properties of orthodontic sealants

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mechanical and esthetic Properties of two commercially available orthodontic sealants: Opal(®)Seal (OS) and L.E.D. Pro Seal (PS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Discs of each sealant were prepared to test the following properties: Micro hardness, wear resistance and color stability. S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Premaraj, Thyagaseely Sheela, Rohani, Nima, Covey, David, Premaraj, Sundaralingam, Hua, Yi, Watanabe, Hidehiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4253104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25512729
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.143630
_version_ 1782347226276691968
author Premaraj, Thyagaseely Sheela
Rohani, Nima
Covey, David
Premaraj, Sundaralingam
Hua, Yi
Watanabe, Hidehiko
author_facet Premaraj, Thyagaseely Sheela
Rohani, Nima
Covey, David
Premaraj, Sundaralingam
Hua, Yi
Watanabe, Hidehiko
author_sort Premaraj, Thyagaseely Sheela
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mechanical and esthetic Properties of two commercially available orthodontic sealants: Opal(®)Seal (OS) and L.E.D. Pro Seal (PS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Discs of each sealant were prepared to test the following properties: Micro hardness, wear resistance and color stability. Samples were randomly selected after the wear test for SEM imaging to analyze surface morphology. RESULTS: OS was significantly harder than PS (P < 0.001). PS was significantly more wear resistant than OS (P < 0.05). PS showed a greater ∆E*ab (increased staining) when placed in wine or coffee showing a significant difference (P < 0.05). SEM showed particle size, shape and distribution were different for PS and OS reflecting the pattern seen on wear surfaces. CONCLUSION: Both orthodontic sealants are beneficial for protecting enamel. However with better wear properties PS was superior in resisting mechanical stresses. OS was more color stable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4253104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42531042014-12-15 An in-vitro evaluation of mechanical and esthetic properties of orthodontic sealants Premaraj, Thyagaseely Sheela Rohani, Nima Covey, David Premaraj, Sundaralingam Hua, Yi Watanabe, Hidehiko Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mechanical and esthetic Properties of two commercially available orthodontic sealants: Opal(®)Seal (OS) and L.E.D. Pro Seal (PS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Discs of each sealant were prepared to test the following properties: Micro hardness, wear resistance and color stability. Samples were randomly selected after the wear test for SEM imaging to analyze surface morphology. RESULTS: OS was significantly harder than PS (P < 0.001). PS was significantly more wear resistant than OS (P < 0.05). PS showed a greater ∆E*ab (increased staining) when placed in wine or coffee showing a significant difference (P < 0.05). SEM showed particle size, shape and distribution were different for PS and OS reflecting the pattern seen on wear surfaces. CONCLUSION: Both orthodontic sealants are beneficial for protecting enamel. However with better wear properties PS was superior in resisting mechanical stresses. OS was more color stable. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4253104/ /pubmed/25512729 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.143630 Text en Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Premaraj, Thyagaseely Sheela
Rohani, Nima
Covey, David
Premaraj, Sundaralingam
Hua, Yi
Watanabe, Hidehiko
An in-vitro evaluation of mechanical and esthetic properties of orthodontic sealants
title An in-vitro evaluation of mechanical and esthetic properties of orthodontic sealants
title_full An in-vitro evaluation of mechanical and esthetic properties of orthodontic sealants
title_fullStr An in-vitro evaluation of mechanical and esthetic properties of orthodontic sealants
title_full_unstemmed An in-vitro evaluation of mechanical and esthetic properties of orthodontic sealants
title_short An in-vitro evaluation of mechanical and esthetic properties of orthodontic sealants
title_sort in-vitro evaluation of mechanical and esthetic properties of orthodontic sealants
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4253104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25512729
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.143630
work_keys_str_mv AT premarajthyagaseelysheela aninvitroevaluationofmechanicalandestheticpropertiesoforthodonticsealants
AT rohaninima aninvitroevaluationofmechanicalandestheticpropertiesoforthodonticsealants
AT coveydavid aninvitroevaluationofmechanicalandestheticpropertiesoforthodonticsealants
AT premarajsundaralingam aninvitroevaluationofmechanicalandestheticpropertiesoforthodonticsealants
AT huayi aninvitroevaluationofmechanicalandestheticpropertiesoforthodonticsealants
AT watanabehidehiko aninvitroevaluationofmechanicalandestheticpropertiesoforthodonticsealants
AT premarajthyagaseelysheela invitroevaluationofmechanicalandestheticpropertiesoforthodonticsealants
AT rohaninima invitroevaluationofmechanicalandestheticpropertiesoforthodonticsealants
AT coveydavid invitroevaluationofmechanicalandestheticpropertiesoforthodonticsealants
AT premarajsundaralingam invitroevaluationofmechanicalandestheticpropertiesoforthodonticsealants
AT huayi invitroevaluationofmechanicalandestheticpropertiesoforthodonticsealants
AT watanabehidehiko invitroevaluationofmechanicalandestheticpropertiesoforthodonticsealants