Cargando…
Among three different executive functions, general executive control ability is a key predictor of decision making under objective risk
Executive functioning is supposed to have an important role in decision making under risk. Several studies reported that more advantageous decision-making behavior was accompanied by better performance in tests of executive functioning and that the decision-making process was accompanied by activati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4253823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25520690 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01386 |
_version_ | 1782347293978001408 |
---|---|
author | Schiebener, Johannes Wegmann, Elisa Gathmann, Bettina Laier, Christian Pawlikowski, Mirko Brand, Matthias |
author_facet | Schiebener, Johannes Wegmann, Elisa Gathmann, Bettina Laier, Christian Pawlikowski, Mirko Brand, Matthias |
author_sort | Schiebener, Johannes |
collection | PubMed |
description | Executive functioning is supposed to have an important role in decision making under risk. Several studies reported that more advantageous decision-making behavior was accompanied by better performance in tests of executive functioning and that the decision-making process was accompanied by activations in prefrontal and subcortical brain regions associated with executive functioning. However, to what extent different components of executive functions contribute to decision making is still unclear. We tested direct and indirect effects of three executive functions on decision-making performance in a laboratory gambling task, the Game of Dice Task (GDT). Using Brand's model of decisions under risk (2006) we tested seven structural equation models with three latent variables that represent executive functions supposed to be involved in decision making. The latent variables were general control (represented by the general ability to exert attentional and behavioral self-control that is in accordance with task goals despite interfering information), concept formation (represented by categorization, rule detection, and set maintenance), and monitoring (represented by supervision of cognition and behavior). The seven models indicated that only the latent dimension general control had a direct effect on decision making under risk. Concept formation and monitoring only contributed in terms of indirect effects, when mediated by general control. Thus, several components of executive functioning seem to be involved in decision making under risk. However, general control functions seem to have a key role. They may be important for implementing the calculative and cognitively controlled processes involved in advantageous decision making under risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4253823 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42538232014-12-17 Among three different executive functions, general executive control ability is a key predictor of decision making under objective risk Schiebener, Johannes Wegmann, Elisa Gathmann, Bettina Laier, Christian Pawlikowski, Mirko Brand, Matthias Front Psychol Psychology Executive functioning is supposed to have an important role in decision making under risk. Several studies reported that more advantageous decision-making behavior was accompanied by better performance in tests of executive functioning and that the decision-making process was accompanied by activations in prefrontal and subcortical brain regions associated with executive functioning. However, to what extent different components of executive functions contribute to decision making is still unclear. We tested direct and indirect effects of three executive functions on decision-making performance in a laboratory gambling task, the Game of Dice Task (GDT). Using Brand's model of decisions under risk (2006) we tested seven structural equation models with three latent variables that represent executive functions supposed to be involved in decision making. The latent variables were general control (represented by the general ability to exert attentional and behavioral self-control that is in accordance with task goals despite interfering information), concept formation (represented by categorization, rule detection, and set maintenance), and monitoring (represented by supervision of cognition and behavior). The seven models indicated that only the latent dimension general control had a direct effect on decision making under risk. Concept formation and monitoring only contributed in terms of indirect effects, when mediated by general control. Thus, several components of executive functioning seem to be involved in decision making under risk. However, general control functions seem to have a key role. They may be important for implementing the calculative and cognitively controlled processes involved in advantageous decision making under risk. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4253823/ /pubmed/25520690 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01386 Text en Copyright © 2014 Schiebener, Wegmann, Gathmann, Laier, Pawlikowski and Brand. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Schiebener, Johannes Wegmann, Elisa Gathmann, Bettina Laier, Christian Pawlikowski, Mirko Brand, Matthias Among three different executive functions, general executive control ability is a key predictor of decision making under objective risk |
title | Among three different executive functions, general executive control ability is a key predictor of decision making under objective risk |
title_full | Among three different executive functions, general executive control ability is a key predictor of decision making under objective risk |
title_fullStr | Among three different executive functions, general executive control ability is a key predictor of decision making under objective risk |
title_full_unstemmed | Among three different executive functions, general executive control ability is a key predictor of decision making under objective risk |
title_short | Among three different executive functions, general executive control ability is a key predictor of decision making under objective risk |
title_sort | among three different executive functions, general executive control ability is a key predictor of decision making under objective risk |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4253823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25520690 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01386 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schiebenerjohannes amongthreedifferentexecutivefunctionsgeneralexecutivecontrolabilityisakeypredictorofdecisionmakingunderobjectiverisk AT wegmannelisa amongthreedifferentexecutivefunctionsgeneralexecutivecontrolabilityisakeypredictorofdecisionmakingunderobjectiverisk AT gathmannbettina amongthreedifferentexecutivefunctionsgeneralexecutivecontrolabilityisakeypredictorofdecisionmakingunderobjectiverisk AT laierchristian amongthreedifferentexecutivefunctionsgeneralexecutivecontrolabilityisakeypredictorofdecisionmakingunderobjectiverisk AT pawlikowskimirko amongthreedifferentexecutivefunctionsgeneralexecutivecontrolabilityisakeypredictorofdecisionmakingunderobjectiverisk AT brandmatthias amongthreedifferentexecutivefunctionsgeneralexecutivecontrolabilityisakeypredictorofdecisionmakingunderobjectiverisk |