Cargando…
Different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine‐motor manipulation task
Performing a complex unimanual motor task markedly increases activation not only in the hemisphere contralateral to the task‐performing hand but also in the ipsilateral hemisphere. Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies showed increased motor evoked potential amplitude recorded in resting hand mu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4254095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25293600 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12170 |
_version_ | 1782347317484978176 |
---|---|
author | Morishita, Takuya Kubota, Shinji Hirano, Masato Funase, Kozo |
author_facet | Morishita, Takuya Kubota, Shinji Hirano, Masato Funase, Kozo |
author_sort | Morishita, Takuya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Performing a complex unimanual motor task markedly increases activation not only in the hemisphere contralateral to the task‐performing hand but also in the ipsilateral hemisphere. Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies showed increased motor evoked potential amplitude recorded in resting hand muscles contralateral to the task‐performing hand during a unimanual motor task, and transcallosal inputs from the active hemisphere have been suggested to have responsibilities for this phenomenon. In the present study, we used a well‐established double‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigm to measure two phases of interhemispheric inhibition from the active to the resting primary motor cortex during the performance of a complex unimanual motor task. Two different unimanual motor tasks were carried out: a fine‐motor manipulation task (using chopsticks to pick up, transport, and release glass balls) as a complex task and a pseudo fine‐motor manipulation task as a control task (mimicking the fine‐motor manipulation task without using chopsticks and picking glass balls). We found increased short‐latency interhemispheric inhibition and decreased long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from the active to the resting primary motor cortex during the fine‐motor manipulation task. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to demonstrate different modulation of two phases of interhemispheric inhibition from the active to the resting primary motor cortex during the performance of a complex unimanual motor task. The different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition may suggest that two phases of interhemispheric inhibition are implemented in distinct circuits with different functional meaning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4254095 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42540952014-12-16 Different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine‐motor manipulation task Morishita, Takuya Kubota, Shinji Hirano, Masato Funase, Kozo Physiol Rep Original Research Performing a complex unimanual motor task markedly increases activation not only in the hemisphere contralateral to the task‐performing hand but also in the ipsilateral hemisphere. Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies showed increased motor evoked potential amplitude recorded in resting hand muscles contralateral to the task‐performing hand during a unimanual motor task, and transcallosal inputs from the active hemisphere have been suggested to have responsibilities for this phenomenon. In the present study, we used a well‐established double‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigm to measure two phases of interhemispheric inhibition from the active to the resting primary motor cortex during the performance of a complex unimanual motor task. Two different unimanual motor tasks were carried out: a fine‐motor manipulation task (using chopsticks to pick up, transport, and release glass balls) as a complex task and a pseudo fine‐motor manipulation task as a control task (mimicking the fine‐motor manipulation task without using chopsticks and picking glass balls). We found increased short‐latency interhemispheric inhibition and decreased long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from the active to the resting primary motor cortex during the fine‐motor manipulation task. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to demonstrate different modulation of two phases of interhemispheric inhibition from the active to the resting primary motor cortex during the performance of a complex unimanual motor task. The different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition may suggest that two phases of interhemispheric inhibition are implemented in distinct circuits with different functional meaning. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2014-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4254095/ /pubmed/25293600 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12170 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Morishita, Takuya Kubota, Shinji Hirano, Masato Funase, Kozo Different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine‐motor manipulation task |
title | Different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine‐motor manipulation task |
title_full | Different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine‐motor manipulation task |
title_fullStr | Different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine‐motor manipulation task |
title_full_unstemmed | Different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine‐motor manipulation task |
title_short | Different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine‐motor manipulation task |
title_sort | different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine‐motor manipulation task |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4254095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25293600 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morishitatakuya differentmodulationofshortandlonglatencyinterhemisphericinhibitionfromactivetorestingprimarymotorcortexduringafinemotormanipulationtask AT kubotashinji differentmodulationofshortandlonglatencyinterhemisphericinhibitionfromactivetorestingprimarymotorcortexduringafinemotormanipulationtask AT hiranomasato differentmodulationofshortandlonglatencyinterhemisphericinhibitionfromactivetorestingprimarymotorcortexduringafinemotormanipulationtask AT funasekozo differentmodulationofshortandlonglatencyinterhemisphericinhibitionfromactivetorestingprimarymotorcortexduringafinemotormanipulationtask |