Cargando…

Different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine‐motor manipulation task

Performing a complex unimanual motor task markedly increases activation not only in the hemisphere contralateral to the task‐performing hand but also in the ipsilateral hemisphere. Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies showed increased motor evoked potential amplitude recorded in resting hand mu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morishita, Takuya, Kubota, Shinji, Hirano, Masato, Funase, Kozo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4254095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25293600
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12170
_version_ 1782347317484978176
author Morishita, Takuya
Kubota, Shinji
Hirano, Masato
Funase, Kozo
author_facet Morishita, Takuya
Kubota, Shinji
Hirano, Masato
Funase, Kozo
author_sort Morishita, Takuya
collection PubMed
description Performing a complex unimanual motor task markedly increases activation not only in the hemisphere contralateral to the task‐performing hand but also in the ipsilateral hemisphere. Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies showed increased motor evoked potential amplitude recorded in resting hand muscles contralateral to the task‐performing hand during a unimanual motor task, and transcallosal inputs from the active hemisphere have been suggested to have responsibilities for this phenomenon. In the present study, we used a well‐established double‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigm to measure two phases of interhemispheric inhibition from the active to the resting primary motor cortex during the performance of a complex unimanual motor task. Two different unimanual motor tasks were carried out: a fine‐motor manipulation task (using chopsticks to pick up, transport, and release glass balls) as a complex task and a pseudo fine‐motor manipulation task as a control task (mimicking the fine‐motor manipulation task without using chopsticks and picking glass balls). We found increased short‐latency interhemispheric inhibition and decreased long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from the active to the resting primary motor cortex during the fine‐motor manipulation task. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to demonstrate different modulation of two phases of interhemispheric inhibition from the active to the resting primary motor cortex during the performance of a complex unimanual motor task. The different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition may suggest that two phases of interhemispheric inhibition are implemented in distinct circuits with different functional meaning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4254095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42540952014-12-16 Different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine‐motor manipulation task Morishita, Takuya Kubota, Shinji Hirano, Masato Funase, Kozo Physiol Rep Original Research Performing a complex unimanual motor task markedly increases activation not only in the hemisphere contralateral to the task‐performing hand but also in the ipsilateral hemisphere. Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies showed increased motor evoked potential amplitude recorded in resting hand muscles contralateral to the task‐performing hand during a unimanual motor task, and transcallosal inputs from the active hemisphere have been suggested to have responsibilities for this phenomenon. In the present study, we used a well‐established double‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigm to measure two phases of interhemispheric inhibition from the active to the resting primary motor cortex during the performance of a complex unimanual motor task. Two different unimanual motor tasks were carried out: a fine‐motor manipulation task (using chopsticks to pick up, transport, and release glass balls) as a complex task and a pseudo fine‐motor manipulation task as a control task (mimicking the fine‐motor manipulation task without using chopsticks and picking glass balls). We found increased short‐latency interhemispheric inhibition and decreased long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from the active to the resting primary motor cortex during the fine‐motor manipulation task. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to demonstrate different modulation of two phases of interhemispheric inhibition from the active to the resting primary motor cortex during the performance of a complex unimanual motor task. The different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition may suggest that two phases of interhemispheric inhibition are implemented in distinct circuits with different functional meaning. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2014-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4254095/ /pubmed/25293600 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12170 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Morishita, Takuya
Kubota, Shinji
Hirano, Masato
Funase, Kozo
Different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine‐motor manipulation task
title Different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine‐motor manipulation task
title_full Different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine‐motor manipulation task
title_fullStr Different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine‐motor manipulation task
title_full_unstemmed Different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine‐motor manipulation task
title_short Different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine‐motor manipulation task
title_sort different modulation of short‐ and long‐latency interhemispheric inhibition from active to resting primary motor cortex during a fine‐motor manipulation task
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4254095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25293600
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12170
work_keys_str_mv AT morishitatakuya differentmodulationofshortandlonglatencyinterhemisphericinhibitionfromactivetorestingprimarymotorcortexduringafinemotormanipulationtask
AT kubotashinji differentmodulationofshortandlonglatencyinterhemisphericinhibitionfromactivetorestingprimarymotorcortexduringafinemotormanipulationtask
AT hiranomasato differentmodulationofshortandlonglatencyinterhemisphericinhibitionfromactivetorestingprimarymotorcortexduringafinemotormanipulationtask
AT funasekozo differentmodulationofshortandlonglatencyinterhemisphericinhibitionfromactivetorestingprimarymotorcortexduringafinemotormanipulationtask