Cargando…
Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Transpapillary Stenting or External Biliary Drainage?
BACKGROUND: To date, the management of common bile duct stones (CBDs) is still controversial. If laparoscopic exploration is performed and biliary decompression is needed after stone removal, the placement of a laparoscopic transpapillary stent shows promising results in avoiding T-tube–related comp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4254483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25489219 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00277 |
_version_ | 1782347347220496384 |
---|---|
author | Dietrich, Agustin Alvarez, Fernando Resio, Nicolas Mazza, Oscar de Santibañes, Eduardo Pekolj, Juan Clariá, Rodrigo Sanchez de Santibañes, Martin |
author_facet | Dietrich, Agustin Alvarez, Fernando Resio, Nicolas Mazza, Oscar de Santibañes, Eduardo Pekolj, Juan Clariá, Rodrigo Sanchez de Santibañes, Martin |
author_sort | Dietrich, Agustin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To date, the management of common bile duct stones (CBDs) is still controversial. If laparoscopic exploration is performed and biliary decompression is needed after stone removal, the placement of a laparoscopic transpapillary stent shows promising results in avoiding T-tube–related complications. METHODS: Between January 2007 and May 2012, a series of 48 patients who underwent biliary decompression after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) to treat choledocholithiasis was retrospectively analyzed. The results in patients with transpapillary stent placement (TS=35) were compared with those who had an external biliary drainage (EBD=13). RESULTS: LCBDE and TS placement was achieved either by a choledochotomy or through the cystic duct. There was no mortality in our series. Patients with an external biliary drainage (EBD) had more surgery-related complications (P<.0001) and a longer hospital stay (P=.03). Postoperative ERCP to remove the TS was successful in all cases. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic TS is a safe method in the treatment of selected patients with CBD stones that can be achieved without having to perform a choledochotomy. Because of the lower morbidity and the shorter hospital stay compared with EBD, it should be considered as a first approach whenever biliary decompression is needed after LCBDE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4254483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42544832014-12-08 Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Transpapillary Stenting or External Biliary Drainage? Dietrich, Agustin Alvarez, Fernando Resio, Nicolas Mazza, Oscar de Santibañes, Eduardo Pekolj, Juan Clariá, Rodrigo Sanchez de Santibañes, Martin JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND: To date, the management of common bile duct stones (CBDs) is still controversial. If laparoscopic exploration is performed and biliary decompression is needed after stone removal, the placement of a laparoscopic transpapillary stent shows promising results in avoiding T-tube–related complications. METHODS: Between January 2007 and May 2012, a series of 48 patients who underwent biliary decompression after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) to treat choledocholithiasis was retrospectively analyzed. The results in patients with transpapillary stent placement (TS=35) were compared with those who had an external biliary drainage (EBD=13). RESULTS: LCBDE and TS placement was achieved either by a choledochotomy or through the cystic duct. There was no mortality in our series. Patients with an external biliary drainage (EBD) had more surgery-related complications (P<.0001) and a longer hospital stay (P=.03). Postoperative ERCP to remove the TS was successful in all cases. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic TS is a safe method in the treatment of selected patients with CBD stones that can be achieved without having to perform a choledochotomy. Because of the lower morbidity and the shorter hospital stay compared with EBD, it should be considered as a first approach whenever biliary decompression is needed after LCBDE. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4254483/ /pubmed/25489219 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00277 Text en © 2014 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Papers Dietrich, Agustin Alvarez, Fernando Resio, Nicolas Mazza, Oscar de Santibañes, Eduardo Pekolj, Juan Clariá, Rodrigo Sanchez de Santibañes, Martin Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Transpapillary Stenting or External Biliary Drainage? |
title | Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Transpapillary Stenting or External Biliary Drainage? |
title_full | Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Transpapillary Stenting or External Biliary Drainage? |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Transpapillary Stenting or External Biliary Drainage? |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Transpapillary Stenting or External Biliary Drainage? |
title_short | Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Transpapillary Stenting or External Biliary Drainage? |
title_sort | laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transpapillary stenting or external biliary drainage? |
topic | Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4254483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25489219 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00277 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dietrichagustin laparoscopicmanagementofcommonbileductstonestranspapillarystentingorexternalbiliarydrainage AT alvarezfernando laparoscopicmanagementofcommonbileductstonestranspapillarystentingorexternalbiliarydrainage AT resionicolas laparoscopicmanagementofcommonbileductstonestranspapillarystentingorexternalbiliarydrainage AT mazzaoscar laparoscopicmanagementofcommonbileductstonestranspapillarystentingorexternalbiliarydrainage AT desantibaneseduardo laparoscopicmanagementofcommonbileductstonestranspapillarystentingorexternalbiliarydrainage AT pekoljjuan laparoscopicmanagementofcommonbileductstonestranspapillarystentingorexternalbiliarydrainage AT clariarodrigosanchez laparoscopicmanagementofcommonbileductstonestranspapillarystentingorexternalbiliarydrainage AT desantibanesmartin laparoscopicmanagementofcommonbileductstonestranspapillarystentingorexternalbiliarydrainage |