Cargando…

Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Transpapillary Stenting or External Biliary Drainage?

BACKGROUND: To date, the management of common bile duct stones (CBDs) is still controversial. If laparoscopic exploration is performed and biliary decompression is needed after stone removal, the placement of a laparoscopic transpapillary stent shows promising results in avoiding T-tube–related comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dietrich, Agustin, Alvarez, Fernando, Resio, Nicolas, Mazza, Oscar, de Santibañes, Eduardo, Pekolj, Juan, Clariá, Rodrigo Sanchez, de Santibañes, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4254483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25489219
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00277
_version_ 1782347347220496384
author Dietrich, Agustin
Alvarez, Fernando
Resio, Nicolas
Mazza, Oscar
de Santibañes, Eduardo
Pekolj, Juan
Clariá, Rodrigo Sanchez
de Santibañes, Martin
author_facet Dietrich, Agustin
Alvarez, Fernando
Resio, Nicolas
Mazza, Oscar
de Santibañes, Eduardo
Pekolj, Juan
Clariá, Rodrigo Sanchez
de Santibañes, Martin
author_sort Dietrich, Agustin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To date, the management of common bile duct stones (CBDs) is still controversial. If laparoscopic exploration is performed and biliary decompression is needed after stone removal, the placement of a laparoscopic transpapillary stent shows promising results in avoiding T-tube–related complications. METHODS: Between January 2007 and May 2012, a series of 48 patients who underwent biliary decompression after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) to treat choledocholithiasis was retrospectively analyzed. The results in patients with transpapillary stent placement (TS=35) were compared with those who had an external biliary drainage (EBD=13). RESULTS: LCBDE and TS placement was achieved either by a choledochotomy or through the cystic duct. There was no mortality in our series. Patients with an external biliary drainage (EBD) had more surgery-related complications (P<.0001) and a longer hospital stay (P=.03). Postoperative ERCP to remove the TS was successful in all cases. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic TS is a safe method in the treatment of selected patients with CBD stones that can be achieved without having to perform a choledochotomy. Because of the lower morbidity and the shorter hospital stay compared with EBD, it should be considered as a first approach whenever biliary decompression is needed after LCBDE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4254483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42544832014-12-08 Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Transpapillary Stenting or External Biliary Drainage? Dietrich, Agustin Alvarez, Fernando Resio, Nicolas Mazza, Oscar de Santibañes, Eduardo Pekolj, Juan Clariá, Rodrigo Sanchez de Santibañes, Martin JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND: To date, the management of common bile duct stones (CBDs) is still controversial. If laparoscopic exploration is performed and biliary decompression is needed after stone removal, the placement of a laparoscopic transpapillary stent shows promising results in avoiding T-tube–related complications. METHODS: Between January 2007 and May 2012, a series of 48 patients who underwent biliary decompression after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) to treat choledocholithiasis was retrospectively analyzed. The results in patients with transpapillary stent placement (TS=35) were compared with those who had an external biliary drainage (EBD=13). RESULTS: LCBDE and TS placement was achieved either by a choledochotomy or through the cystic duct. There was no mortality in our series. Patients with an external biliary drainage (EBD) had more surgery-related complications (P<.0001) and a longer hospital stay (P=.03). Postoperative ERCP to remove the TS was successful in all cases. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic TS is a safe method in the treatment of selected patients with CBD stones that can be achieved without having to perform a choledochotomy. Because of the lower morbidity and the shorter hospital stay compared with EBD, it should be considered as a first approach whenever biliary decompression is needed after LCBDE. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4254483/ /pubmed/25489219 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00277 Text en © 2014 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Dietrich, Agustin
Alvarez, Fernando
Resio, Nicolas
Mazza, Oscar
de Santibañes, Eduardo
Pekolj, Juan
Clariá, Rodrigo Sanchez
de Santibañes, Martin
Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Transpapillary Stenting or External Biliary Drainage?
title Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Transpapillary Stenting or External Biliary Drainage?
title_full Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Transpapillary Stenting or External Biliary Drainage?
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Transpapillary Stenting or External Biliary Drainage?
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Transpapillary Stenting or External Biliary Drainage?
title_short Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Transpapillary Stenting or External Biliary Drainage?
title_sort laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transpapillary stenting or external biliary drainage?
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4254483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25489219
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00277
work_keys_str_mv AT dietrichagustin laparoscopicmanagementofcommonbileductstonestranspapillarystentingorexternalbiliarydrainage
AT alvarezfernando laparoscopicmanagementofcommonbileductstonestranspapillarystentingorexternalbiliarydrainage
AT resionicolas laparoscopicmanagementofcommonbileductstonestranspapillarystentingorexternalbiliarydrainage
AT mazzaoscar laparoscopicmanagementofcommonbileductstonestranspapillarystentingorexternalbiliarydrainage
AT desantibaneseduardo laparoscopicmanagementofcommonbileductstonestranspapillarystentingorexternalbiliarydrainage
AT pekoljjuan laparoscopicmanagementofcommonbileductstonestranspapillarystentingorexternalbiliarydrainage
AT clariarodrigosanchez laparoscopicmanagementofcommonbileductstonestranspapillarystentingorexternalbiliarydrainage
AT desantibanesmartin laparoscopicmanagementofcommonbileductstonestranspapillarystentingorexternalbiliarydrainage