Cargando…

Characterizing the Evolutionary Path(s) to Early Homo

Numerous studies suggest that the transition from Australopithecus to Homo was characterized by evolutionary innovation, resulting in the emergence and coexistence of a diversity of forms. However, the evolutionary processes necessary to drive such a transition have not been examined. Here, we apply...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schroeder, Lauren, Roseman, Charles C., Cheverud, James M., Ackermann, Rebecca R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4255019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25470780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114307
_version_ 1782347377131126784
author Schroeder, Lauren
Roseman, Charles C.
Cheverud, James M.
Ackermann, Rebecca R.
author_facet Schroeder, Lauren
Roseman, Charles C.
Cheverud, James M.
Ackermann, Rebecca R.
author_sort Schroeder, Lauren
collection PubMed
description Numerous studies suggest that the transition from Australopithecus to Homo was characterized by evolutionary innovation, resulting in the emergence and coexistence of a diversity of forms. However, the evolutionary processes necessary to drive such a transition have not been examined. Here, we apply statistical tests developed from quantitative evolutionary theory to assess whether morphological differences among late australopith and early Homo species in Africa have been shaped by natural selection. Where selection is demonstrated, we identify aspects of morphology that were most likely under selective pressure, and determine the nature (type, rate) of that selection. Results demonstrate that selection must be invoked to explain an Au. africanus—Au. sediba—Homo transition, while transitions from late australopiths to various early Homo species that exclude Au. sediba can be achieved through drift alone. Rate tests indicate that selection is largely directional, acting to rapidly differentiate these taxa. Reconstructions of patterns of directional selection needed to drive the Au. africanus—Au. sediba—Homo transition suggest that selection would have affected all regions of the skull. These results may indicate that an evolutionary path to Homo without Au. sediba is the simpler path and/or provide evidence that this pathway involved more reliance on cultural adaptations to cope with environmental change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4255019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42550192014-12-11 Characterizing the Evolutionary Path(s) to Early Homo Schroeder, Lauren Roseman, Charles C. Cheverud, James M. Ackermann, Rebecca R. PLoS One Research Article Numerous studies suggest that the transition from Australopithecus to Homo was characterized by evolutionary innovation, resulting in the emergence and coexistence of a diversity of forms. However, the evolutionary processes necessary to drive such a transition have not been examined. Here, we apply statistical tests developed from quantitative evolutionary theory to assess whether morphological differences among late australopith and early Homo species in Africa have been shaped by natural selection. Where selection is demonstrated, we identify aspects of morphology that were most likely under selective pressure, and determine the nature (type, rate) of that selection. Results demonstrate that selection must be invoked to explain an Au. africanus—Au. sediba—Homo transition, while transitions from late australopiths to various early Homo species that exclude Au. sediba can be achieved through drift alone. Rate tests indicate that selection is largely directional, acting to rapidly differentiate these taxa. Reconstructions of patterns of directional selection needed to drive the Au. africanus—Au. sediba—Homo transition suggest that selection would have affected all regions of the skull. These results may indicate that an evolutionary path to Homo without Au. sediba is the simpler path and/or provide evidence that this pathway involved more reliance on cultural adaptations to cope with environmental change. Public Library of Science 2014-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4255019/ /pubmed/25470780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114307 Text en © 2014 Schroeder et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schroeder, Lauren
Roseman, Charles C.
Cheverud, James M.
Ackermann, Rebecca R.
Characterizing the Evolutionary Path(s) to Early Homo
title Characterizing the Evolutionary Path(s) to Early Homo
title_full Characterizing the Evolutionary Path(s) to Early Homo
title_fullStr Characterizing the Evolutionary Path(s) to Early Homo
title_full_unstemmed Characterizing the Evolutionary Path(s) to Early Homo
title_short Characterizing the Evolutionary Path(s) to Early Homo
title_sort characterizing the evolutionary path(s) to early homo
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4255019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25470780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114307
work_keys_str_mv AT schroederlauren characterizingtheevolutionarypathstoearlyhomo
AT rosemancharlesc characterizingtheevolutionarypathstoearlyhomo
AT cheverudjamesm characterizingtheevolutionarypathstoearlyhomo
AT ackermannrebeccar characterizingtheevolutionarypathstoearlyhomo