Cargando…

A comparison of interventional clinical trials in rare versus non-rare diseases: an analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov

OBJECTIVES: To provide a comprehensive characterisation of rare disease clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, and compare against characteristics of trials in non-rare diseases. DESIGN: Registry based study of ClinicalTrials.gov registration entries. METHODS: The ClinicalTrials.gov regis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bell, Stuart A, Tudur Smith, Catrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4255432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25427578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-014-0170-0
_version_ 1782347430974455808
author Bell, Stuart A
Tudur Smith, Catrin
author_facet Bell, Stuart A
Tudur Smith, Catrin
author_sort Bell, Stuart A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To provide a comprehensive characterisation of rare disease clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, and compare against characteristics of trials in non-rare diseases. DESIGN: Registry based study of ClinicalTrials.gov registration entries. METHODS: The ClinicalTrials.gov registry comprised 133,128 studies registered to September 27, 2012. By annotating medical subject heading descriptors to condition terms we could identify rare and non-rare disease trials. A total of 24,088 Interventional trials registered after January 1, 2006, conducted in the United States, Canada and/or the European Union were categorised as rare or non-rare. Characteristics of the respective trials were extracted and summarised with comparative statistics calculated where appropriate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Characteristics of interventional trials reported in the database categorised by rare and non-rare conditions to allow comparison. RESULTS: Of the 24,088 trials categorised 2,759 (11.5%) were classified as rare disease trials and 21,329 (88.5%) related to non-rare conditions. Despite the limitations of the database we found that rare disease trials differed to non-rare disease trials across all characteristics that we examined. Rare disease trials enrolled fewer participants (median 29 vs. 62), were more likely to be single arm (63.0% vs. 29.6%), non-randomised (64.5% vs. 36.1%) and open label (78.7% vs. 52.2%). A higher proportion of rare disease trials were terminated early (13.7% vs. 6.3%) and proportionally fewer rare disease studies were actively pursuing, or waiting to commence, enrolment (15.9% vs. 38.5%). CONCLUSION: Rare disease interventional trials differ from those in non-rare conditions with notable differences in enrolment, design, blinding and randomisation. However, clinical trials should aim to implement the highest trial design standards possible, regardless of whether diseases are rare or not.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4255432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42554322014-12-05 A comparison of interventional clinical trials in rare versus non-rare diseases: an analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov Bell, Stuart A Tudur Smith, Catrin Orphanet J Rare Dis Research OBJECTIVES: To provide a comprehensive characterisation of rare disease clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, and compare against characteristics of trials in non-rare diseases. DESIGN: Registry based study of ClinicalTrials.gov registration entries. METHODS: The ClinicalTrials.gov registry comprised 133,128 studies registered to September 27, 2012. By annotating medical subject heading descriptors to condition terms we could identify rare and non-rare disease trials. A total of 24,088 Interventional trials registered after January 1, 2006, conducted in the United States, Canada and/or the European Union were categorised as rare or non-rare. Characteristics of the respective trials were extracted and summarised with comparative statistics calculated where appropriate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Characteristics of interventional trials reported in the database categorised by rare and non-rare conditions to allow comparison. RESULTS: Of the 24,088 trials categorised 2,759 (11.5%) were classified as rare disease trials and 21,329 (88.5%) related to non-rare conditions. Despite the limitations of the database we found that rare disease trials differed to non-rare disease trials across all characteristics that we examined. Rare disease trials enrolled fewer participants (median 29 vs. 62), were more likely to be single arm (63.0% vs. 29.6%), non-randomised (64.5% vs. 36.1%) and open label (78.7% vs. 52.2%). A higher proportion of rare disease trials were terminated early (13.7% vs. 6.3%) and proportionally fewer rare disease studies were actively pursuing, or waiting to commence, enrolment (15.9% vs. 38.5%). CONCLUSION: Rare disease interventional trials differ from those in non-rare conditions with notable differences in enrolment, design, blinding and randomisation. However, clinical trials should aim to implement the highest trial design standards possible, regardless of whether diseases are rare or not. BioMed Central 2014-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4255432/ /pubmed/25427578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-014-0170-0 Text en © Bell and Tudur Smith; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Bell, Stuart A
Tudur Smith, Catrin
A comparison of interventional clinical trials in rare versus non-rare diseases: an analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov
title A comparison of interventional clinical trials in rare versus non-rare diseases: an analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov
title_full A comparison of interventional clinical trials in rare versus non-rare diseases: an analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov
title_fullStr A comparison of interventional clinical trials in rare versus non-rare diseases: an analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of interventional clinical trials in rare versus non-rare diseases: an analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov
title_short A comparison of interventional clinical trials in rare versus non-rare diseases: an analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov
title_sort comparison of interventional clinical trials in rare versus non-rare diseases: an analysis of clinicaltrials.gov
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4255432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25427578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-014-0170-0
work_keys_str_mv AT bellstuarta acomparisonofinterventionalclinicaltrialsinrareversusnonrarediseasesananalysisofclinicaltrialsgov
AT tudursmithcatrin acomparisonofinterventionalclinicaltrialsinrareversusnonrarediseasesananalysisofclinicaltrialsgov
AT bellstuarta comparisonofinterventionalclinicaltrialsinrareversusnonrarediseasesananalysisofclinicaltrialsgov
AT tudursmithcatrin comparisonofinterventionalclinicaltrialsinrareversusnonrarediseasesananalysisofclinicaltrialsgov