Cargando…
Strategy for communicating benefit-risk decisions: a comparison of regulatory agencies' publicly available documents
The assessment report formats of four major regulatory reference agencies, US Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, Health Canada, and Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration were compared to a benefit-risk (BR) documentation template developed by the Centre for Innovati...
Autores principales: | Leong Wai Yeen, James, Salek, Sam, Walker, Stuart |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4255503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25538620 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2014.00269 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A practical approach to communicating benefit-risk decisions of medicines to stakeholders
por: Leong, James, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Can Standardisation of the Public Assessment Report Improve Benefit-Risk Communication?
por: Keyter, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
A Comparison of Reimbursement Recommendations by European HTA Agencies: Is There Opportunity for Further Alignment?
por: Allen, Nicola, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Evaluating Quality of Decision-Making Processes in Medicines' Development, Regulatory Review, and Health Technology Assessment: A Systematic Review of the Literature
por: Bujar, Magdalena, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The South African Regulatory System: Past, Present, and Future
por: Keyter, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2018)