Cargando…
Effect of tibial tray design on cement morphology in total knee arthroplasty
BACKGROUND: Improvements to enforce primary fixation in cemented total knee arthroplasty have been suggested to be a key issue for long-term survival. In this context, it has been questioned whether specific implant design features influence bone cement morphology and hence primary interface strengt...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4255663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25471122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0123-2 |
_version_ | 1782347468121309184 |
---|---|
author | Schlegel, Ulf J Püschel, Klaus Morlock, Michael M Nagel, Katrin |
author_facet | Schlegel, Ulf J Püschel, Klaus Morlock, Michael M Nagel, Katrin |
author_sort | Schlegel, Ulf J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improvements to enforce primary fixation in cemented total knee arthroplasty have been suggested to be a key issue for long-term survival. In this context, it has been questioned whether specific implant design features influence bone cement morphology and hence primary interface strength. The purpose of this study was to investigate in vitro the influence of cement pockets on the tibial tray on cement penetration in the tibia. METHODS: Eight paired cadaveric, human tibiae were available for investigation. One side of a pair was implanted with a fixed bearing tibial tray (FB) featuring cement pockets on the undersurface, while in the other side, a mobile bearing platform (MB) without cement pockets was used. Specimens underwent computed tomography analysis of the cement morphology as well as BMD assessment. RESULTS: While bone cement layer between implant and bone surface was thicker in the FB group (p = 0.032), bone cement penetration was not influenced by implant design (p = 0.529). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that cement pockets do not alter or enforce bone cement penetration under the tibial tray in an in vitro scenario. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4255663 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42556632014-12-05 Effect of tibial tray design on cement morphology in total knee arthroplasty Schlegel, Ulf J Püschel, Klaus Morlock, Michael M Nagel, Katrin J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Improvements to enforce primary fixation in cemented total knee arthroplasty have been suggested to be a key issue for long-term survival. In this context, it has been questioned whether specific implant design features influence bone cement morphology and hence primary interface strength. The purpose of this study was to investigate in vitro the influence of cement pockets on the tibial tray on cement penetration in the tibia. METHODS: Eight paired cadaveric, human tibiae were available for investigation. One side of a pair was implanted with a fixed bearing tibial tray (FB) featuring cement pockets on the undersurface, while in the other side, a mobile bearing platform (MB) without cement pockets was used. Specimens underwent computed tomography analysis of the cement morphology as well as BMD assessment. RESULTS: While bone cement layer between implant and bone surface was thicker in the FB group (p = 0.032), bone cement penetration was not influenced by implant design (p = 0.529). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that cement pockets do not alter or enforce bone cement penetration under the tibial tray in an in vitro scenario. BioMed Central 2014-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4255663/ /pubmed/25471122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0123-2 Text en © Schlegel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schlegel, Ulf J Püschel, Klaus Morlock, Michael M Nagel, Katrin Effect of tibial tray design on cement morphology in total knee arthroplasty |
title | Effect of tibial tray design on cement morphology in total knee arthroplasty |
title_full | Effect of tibial tray design on cement morphology in total knee arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | Effect of tibial tray design on cement morphology in total knee arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of tibial tray design on cement morphology in total knee arthroplasty |
title_short | Effect of tibial tray design on cement morphology in total knee arthroplasty |
title_sort | effect of tibial tray design on cement morphology in total knee arthroplasty |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4255663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25471122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0123-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schlegelulfj effectoftibialtraydesignoncementmorphologyintotalkneearthroplasty AT puschelklaus effectoftibialtraydesignoncementmorphologyintotalkneearthroplasty AT morlockmichaelm effectoftibialtraydesignoncementmorphologyintotalkneearthroplasty AT nagelkatrin effectoftibialtraydesignoncementmorphologyintotalkneearthroplasty |