Cargando…

Oral health and welfare state regimes: a cross-national analysis of European countries

Very little is known about the potential relationship between welfare state regimes and oral health. This study assessed the oral health of adults in a range of European countries clustered by welfare regimes according to Ferrera's typology and the complementary Eastern type. We analysed data f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guarnizo-Herreño, Carol C, Tsakos, Georgios, Sheiham, Aubrey, Watt, Richard G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4255683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23659239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eos.12049
_version_ 1782347472571465728
author Guarnizo-Herreño, Carol C
Tsakos, Georgios
Sheiham, Aubrey
Watt, Richard G
author_facet Guarnizo-Herreño, Carol C
Tsakos, Georgios
Sheiham, Aubrey
Watt, Richard G
author_sort Guarnizo-Herreño, Carol C
collection PubMed
description Very little is known about the potential relationship between welfare state regimes and oral health. This study assessed the oral health of adults in a range of European countries clustered by welfare regimes according to Ferrera's typology and the complementary Eastern type. We analysed data from Eurobarometer wave 72.3, a cross-sectional survey of 31 European countries carried out in 2009. We evaluated three self-reported oral health outcomes: edentulousness, no functional dentition (<20 natural teeth), and oral impacts on daily living. Age-standardized prevalence rates were estimated for each country and for each welfare state regime. The Scandinavian regime showed lower prevalence rates for all outcomes. For edentulousness and no functional dentition, there were higher prevalence rates in the Eastern regime but no significant differences between Anglo-Saxon, Bismarckian, and Southern regimes. The Southern regime presented a higher prevalence of oral impacts on daily living. Results by country indicated that Sweden had the lowest prevalences for edentulousness and no functional dentition, and Denmark had the lowest prevalence for oral impacts. The results suggest that Scandinavian welfare states, with more redistributive and universal welfare policies, had better population oral health. Future research should provide further insights about the potential mechanisms through which welfare-state regimes would influence oral health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4255683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42556832014-12-08 Oral health and welfare state regimes: a cross-national analysis of European countries Guarnizo-Herreño, Carol C Tsakos, Georgios Sheiham, Aubrey Watt, Richard G Eur J Oral Sci Original Articles Very little is known about the potential relationship between welfare state regimes and oral health. This study assessed the oral health of adults in a range of European countries clustered by welfare regimes according to Ferrera's typology and the complementary Eastern type. We analysed data from Eurobarometer wave 72.3, a cross-sectional survey of 31 European countries carried out in 2009. We evaluated three self-reported oral health outcomes: edentulousness, no functional dentition (<20 natural teeth), and oral impacts on daily living. Age-standardized prevalence rates were estimated for each country and for each welfare state regime. The Scandinavian regime showed lower prevalence rates for all outcomes. For edentulousness and no functional dentition, there were higher prevalence rates in the Eastern regime but no significant differences between Anglo-Saxon, Bismarckian, and Southern regimes. The Southern regime presented a higher prevalence of oral impacts on daily living. Results by country indicated that Sweden had the lowest prevalences for edentulousness and no functional dentition, and Denmark had the lowest prevalence for oral impacts. The results suggest that Scandinavian welfare states, with more redistributive and universal welfare policies, had better population oral health. Future research should provide further insights about the potential mechanisms through which welfare-state regimes would influence oral health. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2013-06 2013-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4255683/ /pubmed/23659239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eos.12049 Text en © 2013 The Authors. Eur J Oral Sci published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Guarnizo-Herreño, Carol C
Tsakos, Georgios
Sheiham, Aubrey
Watt, Richard G
Oral health and welfare state regimes: a cross-national analysis of European countries
title Oral health and welfare state regimes: a cross-national analysis of European countries
title_full Oral health and welfare state regimes: a cross-national analysis of European countries
title_fullStr Oral health and welfare state regimes: a cross-national analysis of European countries
title_full_unstemmed Oral health and welfare state regimes: a cross-national analysis of European countries
title_short Oral health and welfare state regimes: a cross-national analysis of European countries
title_sort oral health and welfare state regimes: a cross-national analysis of european countries
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4255683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23659239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eos.12049
work_keys_str_mv AT guarnizoherrenocarolc oralhealthandwelfarestateregimesacrossnationalanalysisofeuropeancountries
AT tsakosgeorgios oralhealthandwelfarestateregimesacrossnationalanalysisofeuropeancountries
AT sheihamaubrey oralhealthandwelfarestateregimesacrossnationalanalysisofeuropeancountries
AT wattrichardg oralhealthandwelfarestateregimesacrossnationalanalysisofeuropeancountries