Cargando…

Characterization of acute ischemia‐related physiological responses associated with remote ischemic preconditioning: a randomized controlled, crossover human study

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC) is emerging as a new noninvasive intervention that has the potential to protect a number of organs against ischemia–reperfusion (IR) injury. The standard protocols normally used to deliver RIPC involve a number of cycles of inflation of a blood pressure (BP) cu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Vikram, Cunniffe, Brian, Verma, Amit P., Cardinale, Marco, Yellon, Derek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4255807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25413320
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12200
_version_ 1782347495297253376
author Sharma, Vikram
Cunniffe, Brian
Verma, Amit P.
Cardinale, Marco
Yellon, Derek
author_facet Sharma, Vikram
Cunniffe, Brian
Verma, Amit P.
Cardinale, Marco
Yellon, Derek
author_sort Sharma, Vikram
collection PubMed
description Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC) is emerging as a new noninvasive intervention that has the potential to protect a number of organs against ischemia–reperfusion (IR) injury. The standard protocols normally used to deliver RIPC involve a number of cycles of inflation of a blood pressure (BP) cuff on the arm and/or leg to an inflation pressure of 200 mmHg followed by cuff deflation for a short period of time. There is little evidence to support what limb (upper or lower) or cuff inflation pressures are most effective to deliver this intervention without causing undue discomfort/pain in nonanesthetized humans. In this preliminary study, a dose–response assessment was performed using a range of cuff inflation pressures (140, 160, and 180 mmHg) to induce limb ischemia in upper and lower limbs. Physiological changes in the occluded limb and any pain/discomfort associated with RIPC with each cuff inflation pressure were determined. Results showed that ischemia can be induced in the upper limb at much lower cuff inflation pressures compared with the standard 200 mmHg pressure generally used for RIPC, provided the cuff inflation pressure is ~30 mmHg higher than the resting systolic BP. In the lower limb, a higher inflation pressure, (~55 mmHg > resting systolic BP), is required to induce ischemia. Cyclical changes in capillary blood O2, CO2, and lactate levels during the RIPC stimulus were observed. RIPC at higher cuff inflation pressures of 160 and 180 mmHg was better tolerated in the upper limb. In summary, limb ischemia for RIPC can be more easily induced at lower pressures and is much better tolerated in the upper limb in young healthy individuals. However, whether benefits of RIPC can also be derived with protocols delivered to the upper limb using lower cuff inflation pressures and with lesser discomfort compared to the lower limb, remains to be investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4255807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42558072014-12-16 Characterization of acute ischemia‐related physiological responses associated with remote ischemic preconditioning: a randomized controlled, crossover human study Sharma, Vikram Cunniffe, Brian Verma, Amit P. Cardinale, Marco Yellon, Derek Physiol Rep Original Research Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC) is emerging as a new noninvasive intervention that has the potential to protect a number of organs against ischemia–reperfusion (IR) injury. The standard protocols normally used to deliver RIPC involve a number of cycles of inflation of a blood pressure (BP) cuff on the arm and/or leg to an inflation pressure of 200 mmHg followed by cuff deflation for a short period of time. There is little evidence to support what limb (upper or lower) or cuff inflation pressures are most effective to deliver this intervention without causing undue discomfort/pain in nonanesthetized humans. In this preliminary study, a dose–response assessment was performed using a range of cuff inflation pressures (140, 160, and 180 mmHg) to induce limb ischemia in upper and lower limbs. Physiological changes in the occluded limb and any pain/discomfort associated with RIPC with each cuff inflation pressure were determined. Results showed that ischemia can be induced in the upper limb at much lower cuff inflation pressures compared with the standard 200 mmHg pressure generally used for RIPC, provided the cuff inflation pressure is ~30 mmHg higher than the resting systolic BP. In the lower limb, a higher inflation pressure, (~55 mmHg > resting systolic BP), is required to induce ischemia. Cyclical changes in capillary blood O2, CO2, and lactate levels during the RIPC stimulus were observed. RIPC at higher cuff inflation pressures of 160 and 180 mmHg was better tolerated in the upper limb. In summary, limb ischemia for RIPC can be more easily induced at lower pressures and is much better tolerated in the upper limb in young healthy individuals. However, whether benefits of RIPC can also be derived with protocols delivered to the upper limb using lower cuff inflation pressures and with lesser discomfort compared to the lower limb, remains to be investigated. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2014-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4255807/ /pubmed/25413320 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12200 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sharma, Vikram
Cunniffe, Brian
Verma, Amit P.
Cardinale, Marco
Yellon, Derek
Characterization of acute ischemia‐related physiological responses associated with remote ischemic preconditioning: a randomized controlled, crossover human study
title Characterization of acute ischemia‐related physiological responses associated with remote ischemic preconditioning: a randomized controlled, crossover human study
title_full Characterization of acute ischemia‐related physiological responses associated with remote ischemic preconditioning: a randomized controlled, crossover human study
title_fullStr Characterization of acute ischemia‐related physiological responses associated with remote ischemic preconditioning: a randomized controlled, crossover human study
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of acute ischemia‐related physiological responses associated with remote ischemic preconditioning: a randomized controlled, crossover human study
title_short Characterization of acute ischemia‐related physiological responses associated with remote ischemic preconditioning: a randomized controlled, crossover human study
title_sort characterization of acute ischemia‐related physiological responses associated with remote ischemic preconditioning: a randomized controlled, crossover human study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4255807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25413320
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12200
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmavikram characterizationofacuteischemiarelatedphysiologicalresponsesassociatedwithremoteischemicpreconditioningarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverhumanstudy
AT cunniffebrian characterizationofacuteischemiarelatedphysiologicalresponsesassociatedwithremoteischemicpreconditioningarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverhumanstudy
AT vermaamitp characterizationofacuteischemiarelatedphysiologicalresponsesassociatedwithremoteischemicpreconditioningarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverhumanstudy
AT cardinalemarco characterizationofacuteischemiarelatedphysiologicalresponsesassociatedwithremoteischemicpreconditioningarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverhumanstudy
AT yellonderek characterizationofacuteischemiarelatedphysiologicalresponsesassociatedwithremoteischemicpreconditioningarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverhumanstudy