Cargando…
Task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning
This study compared the effects of a simple versus complex contraction pattern on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of maximal isometric strength gains and reductions in force variability. A control group (N = 12) performed simple isometric contractions of the wrist flexors. An experimental g...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4255822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25428951 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12218 |
_version_ | 1782347498718756864 |
---|---|
author | McGuire, Jessica Green, Lara A. Gabriel, David A. |
author_facet | McGuire, Jessica Green, Lara A. Gabriel, David A. |
author_sort | McGuire, Jessica |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study compared the effects of a simple versus complex contraction pattern on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of maximal isometric strength gains and reductions in force variability. A control group (N = 12) performed simple isometric contractions of the wrist flexors. An experimental group (N = 12) performed complex proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) contractions consisting of maximal isometric wrist extension immediately reversing force direction to wrist flexion within a single trial. Ten contractions were completed on three consecutive days with a retention and transfer test 2‐weeks later. For the retention test, the groups performed their assigned contraction pattern followed by a transfer test that consisted of the other contraction pattern for a cross‐over design. Both groups exhibited comparable increases in strength (20.2%, P < 0.01) and reductions in mean torque variability (26.2%, P < 0.01), which were retained and transferred. There was a decrease in the coactivation ratio (antagonist/agonist muscle activity) for both groups, which was retained and transferred (35.2%, P < 0.01). The experimental group exhibited a linear decrease in variability of the torque‐ and sEMG‐time curves, indicating transfer to the simple contraction pattern (P < 0.01). The control group underwent a decrease in variability of the torque‐ and sEMG‐time curves from the first day of training to retention, but participants returned to baseline levels during the transfer condition (P < 0.01). However, the difference between torque RMS error versus the variability in torque‐ and sEMG‐time curves suggests the demands of the complex task were transferred, but could not be achieved in a reproducible way. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4255822 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42558222014-12-16 Task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning McGuire, Jessica Green, Lara A. Gabriel, David A. Physiol Rep Original Research This study compared the effects of a simple versus complex contraction pattern on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of maximal isometric strength gains and reductions in force variability. A control group (N = 12) performed simple isometric contractions of the wrist flexors. An experimental group (N = 12) performed complex proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) contractions consisting of maximal isometric wrist extension immediately reversing force direction to wrist flexion within a single trial. Ten contractions were completed on three consecutive days with a retention and transfer test 2‐weeks later. For the retention test, the groups performed their assigned contraction pattern followed by a transfer test that consisted of the other contraction pattern for a cross‐over design. Both groups exhibited comparable increases in strength (20.2%, P < 0.01) and reductions in mean torque variability (26.2%, P < 0.01), which were retained and transferred. There was a decrease in the coactivation ratio (antagonist/agonist muscle activity) for both groups, which was retained and transferred (35.2%, P < 0.01). The experimental group exhibited a linear decrease in variability of the torque‐ and sEMG‐time curves, indicating transfer to the simple contraction pattern (P < 0.01). The control group underwent a decrease in variability of the torque‐ and sEMG‐time curves from the first day of training to retention, but participants returned to baseline levels during the transfer condition (P < 0.01). However, the difference between torque RMS error versus the variability in torque‐ and sEMG‐time curves suggests the demands of the complex task were transferred, but could not be achieved in a reproducible way. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2014-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4255822/ /pubmed/25428951 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12218 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research McGuire, Jessica Green, Lara A. Gabriel, David A. Task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning |
title | Task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning |
title_full | Task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning |
title_fullStr | Task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning |
title_short | Task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning |
title_sort | task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4255822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25428951 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12218 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcguirejessica taskcomplexityandmaximalisometricstrengthgainsthroughmotorlearning AT greenlaraa taskcomplexityandmaximalisometricstrengthgainsthroughmotorlearning AT gabrieldavida taskcomplexityandmaximalisometricstrengthgainsthroughmotorlearning |