Cargando…

Task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning

This study compared the effects of a simple versus complex contraction pattern on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of maximal isometric strength gains and reductions in force variability. A control group (N = 12) performed simple isometric contractions of the wrist flexors. An experimental g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGuire, Jessica, Green, Lara A., Gabriel, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4255822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25428951
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12218
_version_ 1782347498718756864
author McGuire, Jessica
Green, Lara A.
Gabriel, David A.
author_facet McGuire, Jessica
Green, Lara A.
Gabriel, David A.
author_sort McGuire, Jessica
collection PubMed
description This study compared the effects of a simple versus complex contraction pattern on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of maximal isometric strength gains and reductions in force variability. A control group (N = 12) performed simple isometric contractions of the wrist flexors. An experimental group (N = 12) performed complex proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) contractions consisting of maximal isometric wrist extension immediately reversing force direction to wrist flexion within a single trial. Ten contractions were completed on three consecutive days with a retention and transfer test 2‐weeks later. For the retention test, the groups performed their assigned contraction pattern followed by a transfer test that consisted of the other contraction pattern for a cross‐over design. Both groups exhibited comparable increases in strength (20.2%, P < 0.01) and reductions in mean torque variability (26.2%, P < 0.01), which were retained and transferred. There was a decrease in the coactivation ratio (antagonist/agonist muscle activity) for both groups, which was retained and transferred (35.2%, P < 0.01). The experimental group exhibited a linear decrease in variability of the torque‐ and sEMG‐time curves, indicating transfer to the simple contraction pattern (P < 0.01). The control group underwent a decrease in variability of the torque‐ and sEMG‐time curves from the first day of training to retention, but participants returned to baseline levels during the transfer condition (P < 0.01). However, the difference between torque RMS error versus the variability in torque‐ and sEMG‐time curves suggests the demands of the complex task were transferred, but could not be achieved in a reproducible way.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4255822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42558222014-12-16 Task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning McGuire, Jessica Green, Lara A. Gabriel, David A. Physiol Rep Original Research This study compared the effects of a simple versus complex contraction pattern on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of maximal isometric strength gains and reductions in force variability. A control group (N = 12) performed simple isometric contractions of the wrist flexors. An experimental group (N = 12) performed complex proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) contractions consisting of maximal isometric wrist extension immediately reversing force direction to wrist flexion within a single trial. Ten contractions were completed on three consecutive days with a retention and transfer test 2‐weeks later. For the retention test, the groups performed their assigned contraction pattern followed by a transfer test that consisted of the other contraction pattern for a cross‐over design. Both groups exhibited comparable increases in strength (20.2%, P < 0.01) and reductions in mean torque variability (26.2%, P < 0.01), which were retained and transferred. There was a decrease in the coactivation ratio (antagonist/agonist muscle activity) for both groups, which was retained and transferred (35.2%, P < 0.01). The experimental group exhibited a linear decrease in variability of the torque‐ and sEMG‐time curves, indicating transfer to the simple contraction pattern (P < 0.01). The control group underwent a decrease in variability of the torque‐ and sEMG‐time curves from the first day of training to retention, but participants returned to baseline levels during the transfer condition (P < 0.01). However, the difference between torque RMS error versus the variability in torque‐ and sEMG‐time curves suggests the demands of the complex task were transferred, but could not be achieved in a reproducible way. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2014-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4255822/ /pubmed/25428951 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12218 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
McGuire, Jessica
Green, Lara A.
Gabriel, David A.
Task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning
title Task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning
title_full Task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning
title_fullStr Task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning
title_full_unstemmed Task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning
title_short Task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning
title_sort task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4255822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25428951
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12218
work_keys_str_mv AT mcguirejessica taskcomplexityandmaximalisometricstrengthgainsthroughmotorlearning
AT greenlaraa taskcomplexityandmaximalisometricstrengthgainsthroughmotorlearning
AT gabrieldavida taskcomplexityandmaximalisometricstrengthgainsthroughmotorlearning