Cargando…

The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child’s sex

BACKGROUND: Flow cytometric sorting can be used to separate sperm based on sex chromosome content. Differential fluorescence emitted by stained X- vs. Y-chromosome-bearing sperm enables sorting and collection of samples enriched in either X- or Y-bearing sperm for use to influence the likelihood tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karabinus, David S, Marazzo, Donald P, Stern, Harvey J, Potter, Daniel A, Opanga, Chrispo I, Cole, Marisa L, Johnson, Lawrence A, Schulman, Joseph D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4256056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25420620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-106
_version_ 1782347531565400064
author Karabinus, David S
Marazzo, Donald P
Stern, Harvey J
Potter, Daniel A
Opanga, Chrispo I
Cole, Marisa L
Johnson, Lawrence A
Schulman, Joseph D
author_facet Karabinus, David S
Marazzo, Donald P
Stern, Harvey J
Potter, Daniel A
Opanga, Chrispo I
Cole, Marisa L
Johnson, Lawrence A
Schulman, Joseph D
author_sort Karabinus, David S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Flow cytometric sorting can be used to separate sperm based on sex chromosome content. Differential fluorescence emitted by stained X- vs. Y-chromosome-bearing sperm enables sorting and collection of samples enriched in either X- or Y-bearing sperm for use to influence the likelihood that the offspring will be a particular sex. Herein we report the effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm and its use in human ART procedures. METHODS: This prospective, observational cohort study of the series of subjects treated with flow cytometrically sorted human sperm was conducted at investigational sites at two private reproductive centers. After meeting inclusion criteria, married couples (n = 4993) enrolled to reduce the likelihood of sex-linked or sex-limited disease in future children (n = 383) or to balance the sex ratio of their children (n = 4610). Fresh or frozen-thawed semen was processed and recovered sperm were stained with Hoechst 33342 and sorted by flow cytometry (n = 7718) to increase the percentage of X-bearing sperm (n = 5635) or Y-bearing sperm (n = 2083) in the sorted specimen. Sorted sperm were used for IUI (n = 4448) and IVF/ICSI (n = 2957). Measures of effectiveness were the percentage of X- and Y-bearing sperm in sorted samples, determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization, sex of babies born, IVF/ICSI fertilization- and cleavage rates, and IUI, IVF/ICSI, FET pregnancy rates and miscarriage rates. RESULTS: Sorted specimens averaged 87.7 ± 5.0% X-bearing sperm after sorting for X and 74.3 ± 7.0% Y-bearing sperm after sorting for Y. Seventy-three percent of sorts were for girls. For babies born, 93.5% were females and 85.3% were males after sorting for X- and Y-bearing sperm, respectively. IUI, IVF/ICSI, and FET clinical pregnancy rates were 14.7%, 30.8%, and 32.1%, respectively; clinical miscarriage rates were 15.5%, 10.2%, and 12.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Flow cytometric sorting of human sperm shifted the X:Y sperm ratio. IUI, IVF/ICSI and FET outcomes were consistent with unimpaired sperm function. Results provide evidence supporting the effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm for use as a preconception method of influencing a baby’s sex. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00865735 (ClinicalTrials.gov)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4256056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42560562014-12-05 The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child’s sex Karabinus, David S Marazzo, Donald P Stern, Harvey J Potter, Daniel A Opanga, Chrispo I Cole, Marisa L Johnson, Lawrence A Schulman, Joseph D Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Flow cytometric sorting can be used to separate sperm based on sex chromosome content. Differential fluorescence emitted by stained X- vs. Y-chromosome-bearing sperm enables sorting and collection of samples enriched in either X- or Y-bearing sperm for use to influence the likelihood that the offspring will be a particular sex. Herein we report the effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm and its use in human ART procedures. METHODS: This prospective, observational cohort study of the series of subjects treated with flow cytometrically sorted human sperm was conducted at investigational sites at two private reproductive centers. After meeting inclusion criteria, married couples (n = 4993) enrolled to reduce the likelihood of sex-linked or sex-limited disease in future children (n = 383) or to balance the sex ratio of their children (n = 4610). Fresh or frozen-thawed semen was processed and recovered sperm were stained with Hoechst 33342 and sorted by flow cytometry (n = 7718) to increase the percentage of X-bearing sperm (n = 5635) or Y-bearing sperm (n = 2083) in the sorted specimen. Sorted sperm were used for IUI (n = 4448) and IVF/ICSI (n = 2957). Measures of effectiveness were the percentage of X- and Y-bearing sperm in sorted samples, determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization, sex of babies born, IVF/ICSI fertilization- and cleavage rates, and IUI, IVF/ICSI, FET pregnancy rates and miscarriage rates. RESULTS: Sorted specimens averaged 87.7 ± 5.0% X-bearing sperm after sorting for X and 74.3 ± 7.0% Y-bearing sperm after sorting for Y. Seventy-three percent of sorts were for girls. For babies born, 93.5% were females and 85.3% were males after sorting for X- and Y-bearing sperm, respectively. IUI, IVF/ICSI, and FET clinical pregnancy rates were 14.7%, 30.8%, and 32.1%, respectively; clinical miscarriage rates were 15.5%, 10.2%, and 12.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Flow cytometric sorting of human sperm shifted the X:Y sperm ratio. IUI, IVF/ICSI and FET outcomes were consistent with unimpaired sperm function. Results provide evidence supporting the effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm for use as a preconception method of influencing a baby’s sex. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00865735 (ClinicalTrials.gov) BioMed Central 2014-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4256056/ /pubmed/25420620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-106 Text en © Karabinus et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Karabinus, David S
Marazzo, Donald P
Stern, Harvey J
Potter, Daniel A
Opanga, Chrispo I
Cole, Marisa L
Johnson, Lawrence A
Schulman, Joseph D
The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child’s sex
title The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child’s sex
title_full The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child’s sex
title_fullStr The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child’s sex
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child’s sex
title_short The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child’s sex
title_sort effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (microsort®) for influencing a child’s sex
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4256056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25420620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-106
work_keys_str_mv AT karabinusdavids theeffectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex
AT marazzodonaldp theeffectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex
AT sternharveyj theeffectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex
AT potterdaniela theeffectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex
AT opangachrispoi theeffectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex
AT colemarisal theeffectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex
AT johnsonlawrencea theeffectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex
AT schulmanjosephd theeffectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex
AT karabinusdavids effectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex
AT marazzodonaldp effectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex
AT sternharveyj effectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex
AT potterdaniela effectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex
AT opangachrispoi effectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex
AT colemarisal effectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex
AT johnsonlawrencea effectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex
AT schulmanjosephd effectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex