Cargando…
The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child’s sex
BACKGROUND: Flow cytometric sorting can be used to separate sperm based on sex chromosome content. Differential fluorescence emitted by stained X- vs. Y-chromosome-bearing sperm enables sorting and collection of samples enriched in either X- or Y-bearing sperm for use to influence the likelihood tha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4256056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25420620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-106 |
_version_ | 1782347531565400064 |
---|---|
author | Karabinus, David S Marazzo, Donald P Stern, Harvey J Potter, Daniel A Opanga, Chrispo I Cole, Marisa L Johnson, Lawrence A Schulman, Joseph D |
author_facet | Karabinus, David S Marazzo, Donald P Stern, Harvey J Potter, Daniel A Opanga, Chrispo I Cole, Marisa L Johnson, Lawrence A Schulman, Joseph D |
author_sort | Karabinus, David S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Flow cytometric sorting can be used to separate sperm based on sex chromosome content. Differential fluorescence emitted by stained X- vs. Y-chromosome-bearing sperm enables sorting and collection of samples enriched in either X- or Y-bearing sperm for use to influence the likelihood that the offspring will be a particular sex. Herein we report the effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm and its use in human ART procedures. METHODS: This prospective, observational cohort study of the series of subjects treated with flow cytometrically sorted human sperm was conducted at investigational sites at two private reproductive centers. After meeting inclusion criteria, married couples (n = 4993) enrolled to reduce the likelihood of sex-linked or sex-limited disease in future children (n = 383) or to balance the sex ratio of their children (n = 4610). Fresh or frozen-thawed semen was processed and recovered sperm were stained with Hoechst 33342 and sorted by flow cytometry (n = 7718) to increase the percentage of X-bearing sperm (n = 5635) or Y-bearing sperm (n = 2083) in the sorted specimen. Sorted sperm were used for IUI (n = 4448) and IVF/ICSI (n = 2957). Measures of effectiveness were the percentage of X- and Y-bearing sperm in sorted samples, determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization, sex of babies born, IVF/ICSI fertilization- and cleavage rates, and IUI, IVF/ICSI, FET pregnancy rates and miscarriage rates. RESULTS: Sorted specimens averaged 87.7 ± 5.0% X-bearing sperm after sorting for X and 74.3 ± 7.0% Y-bearing sperm after sorting for Y. Seventy-three percent of sorts were for girls. For babies born, 93.5% were females and 85.3% were males after sorting for X- and Y-bearing sperm, respectively. IUI, IVF/ICSI, and FET clinical pregnancy rates were 14.7%, 30.8%, and 32.1%, respectively; clinical miscarriage rates were 15.5%, 10.2%, and 12.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Flow cytometric sorting of human sperm shifted the X:Y sperm ratio. IUI, IVF/ICSI and FET outcomes were consistent with unimpaired sperm function. Results provide evidence supporting the effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm for use as a preconception method of influencing a baby’s sex. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00865735 (ClinicalTrials.gov) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4256056 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42560562014-12-05 The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child’s sex Karabinus, David S Marazzo, Donald P Stern, Harvey J Potter, Daniel A Opanga, Chrispo I Cole, Marisa L Johnson, Lawrence A Schulman, Joseph D Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Flow cytometric sorting can be used to separate sperm based on sex chromosome content. Differential fluorescence emitted by stained X- vs. Y-chromosome-bearing sperm enables sorting and collection of samples enriched in either X- or Y-bearing sperm for use to influence the likelihood that the offspring will be a particular sex. Herein we report the effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm and its use in human ART procedures. METHODS: This prospective, observational cohort study of the series of subjects treated with flow cytometrically sorted human sperm was conducted at investigational sites at two private reproductive centers. After meeting inclusion criteria, married couples (n = 4993) enrolled to reduce the likelihood of sex-linked or sex-limited disease in future children (n = 383) or to balance the sex ratio of their children (n = 4610). Fresh or frozen-thawed semen was processed and recovered sperm were stained with Hoechst 33342 and sorted by flow cytometry (n = 7718) to increase the percentage of X-bearing sperm (n = 5635) or Y-bearing sperm (n = 2083) in the sorted specimen. Sorted sperm were used for IUI (n = 4448) and IVF/ICSI (n = 2957). Measures of effectiveness were the percentage of X- and Y-bearing sperm in sorted samples, determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization, sex of babies born, IVF/ICSI fertilization- and cleavage rates, and IUI, IVF/ICSI, FET pregnancy rates and miscarriage rates. RESULTS: Sorted specimens averaged 87.7 ± 5.0% X-bearing sperm after sorting for X and 74.3 ± 7.0% Y-bearing sperm after sorting for Y. Seventy-three percent of sorts were for girls. For babies born, 93.5% were females and 85.3% were males after sorting for X- and Y-bearing sperm, respectively. IUI, IVF/ICSI, and FET clinical pregnancy rates were 14.7%, 30.8%, and 32.1%, respectively; clinical miscarriage rates were 15.5%, 10.2%, and 12.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Flow cytometric sorting of human sperm shifted the X:Y sperm ratio. IUI, IVF/ICSI and FET outcomes were consistent with unimpaired sperm function. Results provide evidence supporting the effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm for use as a preconception method of influencing a baby’s sex. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00865735 (ClinicalTrials.gov) BioMed Central 2014-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4256056/ /pubmed/25420620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-106 Text en © Karabinus et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Karabinus, David S Marazzo, Donald P Stern, Harvey J Potter, Daniel A Opanga, Chrispo I Cole, Marisa L Johnson, Lawrence A Schulman, Joseph D The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child’s sex |
title | The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child’s sex |
title_full | The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child’s sex |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child’s sex |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child’s sex |
title_short | The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child’s sex |
title_sort | effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (microsort®) for influencing a child’s sex |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4256056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25420620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karabinusdavids theeffectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex AT marazzodonaldp theeffectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex AT sternharveyj theeffectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex AT potterdaniela theeffectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex AT opangachrispoi theeffectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex AT colemarisal theeffectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex AT johnsonlawrencea theeffectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex AT schulmanjosephd theeffectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex AT karabinusdavids effectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex AT marazzodonaldp effectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex AT sternharveyj effectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex AT potterdaniela effectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex AT opangachrispoi effectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex AT colemarisal effectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex AT johnsonlawrencea effectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex AT schulmanjosephd effectivenessofflowcytometricsortingofhumanspermmicrosortforinfluencingachildssex |