Cargando…

How safe are our paediatric emergency departments? Protocol for a national prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Adverse events (AEs), defined as unintended patient harm related to healthcare provided rather than an underlying medical condition, represent a significant threat to patient safety and public health. The emergency department (ED) is a high-risk patient safety setting for many reasons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plint, Amy C, Newton, Amanda, Stang, Antonia, Bhatt, Maala, Barrowman, Nick, Calder, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4256537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25475246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007064
_version_ 1782347598469791744
author Plint, Amy C
Newton, Amanda
Stang, Antonia
Bhatt, Maala
Barrowman, Nick
Calder, Lisa
author_facet Plint, Amy C
Newton, Amanda
Stang, Antonia
Bhatt, Maala
Barrowman, Nick
Calder, Lisa
author_sort Plint, Amy C
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Adverse events (AEs), defined as unintended patient harm related to healthcare provided rather than an underlying medical condition, represent a significant threat to patient safety and public health. The emergency department (ED) is a high-risk patient safety setting for many reasons including presentation ‘outside of regular hours’, high patient volumes, and a chaotic work environment. Children have also been identified as particularly vulnerable to AEs. Despite the identification of the ED as a high-risk setting and the vulnerability of the paediatric population, little research has been conducted regarding paediatric patient safety in the ED. The study objective is to generate an estimate of the risk and type of AEs, as well as their preventability and severity, for children seen in Canadian paediatric EDs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, prospective cohort study will enrol patients under 18 years of age from nine paediatric EDs across Canada. A stratified cluster random sampling scheme will be used to ensure patients recruited are representative of the overall ED population. A rigorous, standardised two-stage process will be used for AE identification. The primary outcome will be the proportion of children with AEs associated with ED care in the 3 weeks following the ED visit. Secondary outcomes will include the proportion of children with preventable AEs and the types and severity of AEs. We will aim to recruit 5632 patients over 1 year and this will allow us to detect a proportion of patients with an AE of 5% (to within an absolute margin of error of 0.6%). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from participating sites. Results will be disseminated through presentations, peer review publications, linkages with emergency research network and a webinars for key knowledge user groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02162147; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02162147).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4256537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42565372014-12-09 How safe are our paediatric emergency departments? Protocol for a national prospective cohort study Plint, Amy C Newton, Amanda Stang, Antonia Bhatt, Maala Barrowman, Nick Calder, Lisa BMJ Open Emergency Medicine INTRODUCTION: Adverse events (AEs), defined as unintended patient harm related to healthcare provided rather than an underlying medical condition, represent a significant threat to patient safety and public health. The emergency department (ED) is a high-risk patient safety setting for many reasons including presentation ‘outside of regular hours’, high patient volumes, and a chaotic work environment. Children have also been identified as particularly vulnerable to AEs. Despite the identification of the ED as a high-risk setting and the vulnerability of the paediatric population, little research has been conducted regarding paediatric patient safety in the ED. The study objective is to generate an estimate of the risk and type of AEs, as well as their preventability and severity, for children seen in Canadian paediatric EDs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, prospective cohort study will enrol patients under 18 years of age from nine paediatric EDs across Canada. A stratified cluster random sampling scheme will be used to ensure patients recruited are representative of the overall ED population. A rigorous, standardised two-stage process will be used for AE identification. The primary outcome will be the proportion of children with AEs associated with ED care in the 3 weeks following the ED visit. Secondary outcomes will include the proportion of children with preventable AEs and the types and severity of AEs. We will aim to recruit 5632 patients over 1 year and this will allow us to detect a proportion of patients with an AE of 5% (to within an absolute margin of error of 0.6%). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from participating sites. Results will be disseminated through presentations, peer review publications, linkages with emergency research network and a webinars for key knowledge user groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02162147; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02162147). BMJ Publishing Group 2014-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4256537/ /pubmed/25475246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007064 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Plint, Amy C
Newton, Amanda
Stang, Antonia
Bhatt, Maala
Barrowman, Nick
Calder, Lisa
How safe are our paediatric emergency departments? Protocol for a national prospective cohort study
title How safe are our paediatric emergency departments? Protocol for a national prospective cohort study
title_full How safe are our paediatric emergency departments? Protocol for a national prospective cohort study
title_fullStr How safe are our paediatric emergency departments? Protocol for a national prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed How safe are our paediatric emergency departments? Protocol for a national prospective cohort study
title_short How safe are our paediatric emergency departments? Protocol for a national prospective cohort study
title_sort how safe are our paediatric emergency departments? protocol for a national prospective cohort study
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4256537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25475246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007064
work_keys_str_mv AT plintamyc howsafeareourpaediatricemergencydepartmentsprotocolforanationalprospectivecohortstudy
AT newtonamanda howsafeareourpaediatricemergencydepartmentsprotocolforanationalprospectivecohortstudy
AT stangantonia howsafeareourpaediatricemergencydepartmentsprotocolforanationalprospectivecohortstudy
AT bhattmaala howsafeareourpaediatricemergencydepartmentsprotocolforanationalprospectivecohortstudy
AT barrowmannick howsafeareourpaediatricemergencydepartmentsprotocolforanationalprospectivecohortstudy
AT calderlisa howsafeareourpaediatricemergencydepartmentsprotocolforanationalprospectivecohortstudy