Cargando…

Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013

There were 109 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) in 2013, which is a 21% increase on the 90 articles published in 2012. The quality of the submissions continues to increase. The editors are delighted to report that the 2012 JCMR Impact Factor (which is pub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pennell, Dudley John, Baksi, Arun John, Kilner, Philip John, Mohiaddin, Raad Hashem, Prasad, Sanjay Kumar, Alpendurada, Francisco, Babu-Narayan, Sonya Vidya, Neubauer, Stefan, Firmin, David Nigel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4256918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25475898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-014-0100-2
_version_ 1782347648437583872
author Pennell, Dudley John
Baksi, Arun John
Kilner, Philip John
Mohiaddin, Raad Hashem
Prasad, Sanjay Kumar
Alpendurada, Francisco
Babu-Narayan, Sonya Vidya
Neubauer, Stefan
Firmin, David Nigel
author_facet Pennell, Dudley John
Baksi, Arun John
Kilner, Philip John
Mohiaddin, Raad Hashem
Prasad, Sanjay Kumar
Alpendurada, Francisco
Babu-Narayan, Sonya Vidya
Neubauer, Stefan
Firmin, David Nigel
author_sort Pennell, Dudley John
collection PubMed
description There were 109 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) in 2013, which is a 21% increase on the 90 articles published in 2012. The quality of the submissions continues to increase. The editors are delighted to report that the 2012 JCMR Impact Factor (which is published in June 2013) has risen to 5.11, up from 4.44 for 2011 (as published in June 2012), a 15% increase and taking us through the 5 threshold for the first time. The 2012 impact factor means that the JCMR papers that were published in 2010 and 2011 were cited on average 5.11 times in 2012. The impact factor undergoes natural variation according to citation rates of papers in the 2 years following publication, and is significantly influenced by highly cited papers such as official reports. However, the progress of the journal's impact over the last 5 years has been impressive. Our acceptance rate is <25% and has been falling because the number of articles being submitted has been increasing. In accordance with Open-Access publishing, the JCMR articles go on-line as they are accepted with no collating of the articles into sections or special thematic issues. For this reason, the Editors have felt that it is useful once per calendar year to summarize the papers for the readership into broad areas of interest or theme, so that areas of interest can be reviewed in a single article in relation to each other and other recent JCMR articles. The papers are presented in broad themes and set in context with related literature and previously published JCMR papers to guide continuity of thought in the journal. We hope that you find the open-access system increases wider reading and citation of your papers, and that you will continue to send your quality manuscripts to JCMR for publication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4256918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42569182014-12-06 Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013 Pennell, Dudley John Baksi, Arun John Kilner, Philip John Mohiaddin, Raad Hashem Prasad, Sanjay Kumar Alpendurada, Francisco Babu-Narayan, Sonya Vidya Neubauer, Stefan Firmin, David Nigel J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Review There were 109 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) in 2013, which is a 21% increase on the 90 articles published in 2012. The quality of the submissions continues to increase. The editors are delighted to report that the 2012 JCMR Impact Factor (which is published in June 2013) has risen to 5.11, up from 4.44 for 2011 (as published in June 2012), a 15% increase and taking us through the 5 threshold for the first time. The 2012 impact factor means that the JCMR papers that were published in 2010 and 2011 were cited on average 5.11 times in 2012. The impact factor undergoes natural variation according to citation rates of papers in the 2 years following publication, and is significantly influenced by highly cited papers such as official reports. However, the progress of the journal's impact over the last 5 years has been impressive. Our acceptance rate is <25% and has been falling because the number of articles being submitted has been increasing. In accordance with Open-Access publishing, the JCMR articles go on-line as they are accepted with no collating of the articles into sections or special thematic issues. For this reason, the Editors have felt that it is useful once per calendar year to summarize the papers for the readership into broad areas of interest or theme, so that areas of interest can be reviewed in a single article in relation to each other and other recent JCMR articles. The papers are presented in broad themes and set in context with related literature and previously published JCMR papers to guide continuity of thought in the journal. We hope that you find the open-access system increases wider reading and citation of your papers, and that you will continue to send your quality manuscripts to JCMR for publication. BioMed Central 2014-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4256918/ /pubmed/25475898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-014-0100-2 Text en © Pennell et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Pennell, Dudley John
Baksi, Arun John
Kilner, Philip John
Mohiaddin, Raad Hashem
Prasad, Sanjay Kumar
Alpendurada, Francisco
Babu-Narayan, Sonya Vidya
Neubauer, Stefan
Firmin, David Nigel
Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013
title Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013
title_full Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013
title_fullStr Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013
title_full_unstemmed Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013
title_short Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013
title_sort review of journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance 2013
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4256918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25475898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-014-0100-2
work_keys_str_mv AT pennelldudleyjohn reviewofjournalofcardiovascularmagneticresonance2013
AT baksiarunjohn reviewofjournalofcardiovascularmagneticresonance2013
AT kilnerphilipjohn reviewofjournalofcardiovascularmagneticresonance2013
AT mohiaddinraadhashem reviewofjournalofcardiovascularmagneticresonance2013
AT prasadsanjaykumar reviewofjournalofcardiovascularmagneticresonance2013
AT alpenduradafrancisco reviewofjournalofcardiovascularmagneticresonance2013
AT babunarayansonyavidya reviewofjournalofcardiovascularmagneticresonance2013
AT neubauerstefan reviewofjournalofcardiovascularmagneticresonance2013
AT firmindavidnigel reviewofjournalofcardiovascularmagneticresonance2013