Cargando…
‘Poisonous, Filthy, Loathsome, Damnable Stuff’: The Rhetorical Ecology of Vaccination Concern
In this article, we analyze newspaper articles and advertisements mentioning vaccination from 1915 to 1922 and refer to historical studies of vaccination practices and attitudes in the early 20th century in order to assess historical continuities and discontinuities in vaccination concern. In the Pr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
YJBM
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4257028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25506275 |
_version_ | 1782347669798125568 |
---|---|
author | Hausman, Bernice L. Ghebremichael, Mecal Hayek, Philip Mack, Erin |
author_facet | Hausman, Bernice L. Ghebremichael, Mecal Hayek, Philip Mack, Erin |
author_sort | Hausman, Bernice L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this article, we analyze newspaper articles and advertisements mentioning vaccination from 1915 to 1922 and refer to historical studies of vaccination practices and attitudes in the early 20th century in order to assess historical continuities and discontinuities in vaccination concern. In the Progressive Era period, there were a number of themes or features that resonated with contemporary issues and circumstances: 1) fears of vaccine contamination; 2) distrust of medical professionals; 3) resistance to compulsory vaccination; and 4) the local nature of vaccination concern. Such observations help scholars and practitioners understand vaccine skepticism as longstanding, locally situated, and linked to the sociocultural contexts in which vaccination occurs and is mandated for particular segments of the population. A rhetorical approach offers a way to understand how discourses are engaged and mobilized for particular purposes in historical contexts. Historically situating vaccine hesitancy and addressing its articulation with a particular rhetorical ecology offers scholars and practitioners a robust understanding of vaccination concerns that can, and should, influence current approaches to vaccination skepticism. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4257028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | YJBM |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42570282014-12-12 ‘Poisonous, Filthy, Loathsome, Damnable Stuff’: The Rhetorical Ecology of Vaccination Concern Hausman, Bernice L. Ghebremichael, Mecal Hayek, Philip Mack, Erin Yale J Biol Med Focus: Vaccines In this article, we analyze newspaper articles and advertisements mentioning vaccination from 1915 to 1922 and refer to historical studies of vaccination practices and attitudes in the early 20th century in order to assess historical continuities and discontinuities in vaccination concern. In the Progressive Era period, there were a number of themes or features that resonated with contemporary issues and circumstances: 1) fears of vaccine contamination; 2) distrust of medical professionals; 3) resistance to compulsory vaccination; and 4) the local nature of vaccination concern. Such observations help scholars and practitioners understand vaccine skepticism as longstanding, locally situated, and linked to the sociocultural contexts in which vaccination occurs and is mandated for particular segments of the population. A rhetorical approach offers a way to understand how discourses are engaged and mobilized for particular purposes in historical contexts. Historically situating vaccine hesitancy and addressing its articulation with a particular rhetorical ecology offers scholars and practitioners a robust understanding of vaccination concerns that can, and should, influence current approaches to vaccination skepticism. YJBM 2014-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4257028/ /pubmed/25506275 Text en Copyright ©2014, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY-NC license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Focus: Vaccines Hausman, Bernice L. Ghebremichael, Mecal Hayek, Philip Mack, Erin ‘Poisonous, Filthy, Loathsome, Damnable Stuff’: The Rhetorical Ecology of Vaccination Concern |
title | ‘Poisonous, Filthy, Loathsome, Damnable Stuff’: The Rhetorical Ecology of Vaccination Concern |
title_full | ‘Poisonous, Filthy, Loathsome, Damnable Stuff’: The Rhetorical Ecology of Vaccination Concern |
title_fullStr | ‘Poisonous, Filthy, Loathsome, Damnable Stuff’: The Rhetorical Ecology of Vaccination Concern |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘Poisonous, Filthy, Loathsome, Damnable Stuff’: The Rhetorical Ecology of Vaccination Concern |
title_short | ‘Poisonous, Filthy, Loathsome, Damnable Stuff’: The Rhetorical Ecology of Vaccination Concern |
title_sort | ‘poisonous, filthy, loathsome, damnable stuff’: the rhetorical ecology of vaccination concern |
topic | Focus: Vaccines |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4257028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25506275 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hausmanbernicel poisonousfilthyloathsomedamnablestufftherhetoricalecologyofvaccinationconcern AT ghebremichaelmecal poisonousfilthyloathsomedamnablestufftherhetoricalecologyofvaccinationconcern AT hayekphilip poisonousfilthyloathsomedamnablestufftherhetoricalecologyofvaccinationconcern AT mackerin poisonousfilthyloathsomedamnablestufftherhetoricalecologyofvaccinationconcern |