Cargando…

‘Poisonous, Filthy, Loathsome, Damnable Stuff’: The Rhetorical Ecology of Vaccination Concern

In this article, we analyze newspaper articles and advertisements mentioning vaccination from 1915 to 1922 and refer to historical studies of vaccination practices and attitudes in the early 20th century in order to assess historical continuities and discontinuities in vaccination concern. In the Pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hausman, Bernice L., Ghebremichael, Mecal, Hayek, Philip, Mack, Erin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: YJBM 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4257028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25506275
_version_ 1782347669798125568
author Hausman, Bernice L.
Ghebremichael, Mecal
Hayek, Philip
Mack, Erin
author_facet Hausman, Bernice L.
Ghebremichael, Mecal
Hayek, Philip
Mack, Erin
author_sort Hausman, Bernice L.
collection PubMed
description In this article, we analyze newspaper articles and advertisements mentioning vaccination from 1915 to 1922 and refer to historical studies of vaccination practices and attitudes in the early 20th century in order to assess historical continuities and discontinuities in vaccination concern. In the Progressive Era period, there were a number of themes or features that resonated with contemporary issues and circumstances: 1) fears of vaccine contamination; 2) distrust of medical professionals; 3) resistance to compulsory vaccination; and 4) the local nature of vaccination concern. Such observations help scholars and practitioners understand vaccine skepticism as longstanding, locally situated, and linked to the sociocultural contexts in which vaccination occurs and is mandated for particular segments of the population. A rhetorical approach offers a way to understand how discourses are engaged and mobilized for particular purposes in historical contexts. Historically situating vaccine hesitancy and addressing its articulation with a particular rhetorical ecology offers scholars and practitioners a robust understanding of vaccination concerns that can, and should, influence current approaches to vaccination skepticism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4257028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher YJBM
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42570282014-12-12 ‘Poisonous, Filthy, Loathsome, Damnable Stuff’: The Rhetorical Ecology of Vaccination Concern Hausman, Bernice L. Ghebremichael, Mecal Hayek, Philip Mack, Erin Yale J Biol Med Focus: Vaccines In this article, we analyze newspaper articles and advertisements mentioning vaccination from 1915 to 1922 and refer to historical studies of vaccination practices and attitudes in the early 20th century in order to assess historical continuities and discontinuities in vaccination concern. In the Progressive Era period, there were a number of themes or features that resonated with contemporary issues and circumstances: 1) fears of vaccine contamination; 2) distrust of medical professionals; 3) resistance to compulsory vaccination; and 4) the local nature of vaccination concern. Such observations help scholars and practitioners understand vaccine skepticism as longstanding, locally situated, and linked to the sociocultural contexts in which vaccination occurs and is mandated for particular segments of the population. A rhetorical approach offers a way to understand how discourses are engaged and mobilized for particular purposes in historical contexts. Historically situating vaccine hesitancy and addressing its articulation with a particular rhetorical ecology offers scholars and practitioners a robust understanding of vaccination concerns that can, and should, influence current approaches to vaccination skepticism. YJBM 2014-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4257028/ /pubmed/25506275 Text en Copyright ©2014, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY-NC license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Focus: Vaccines
Hausman, Bernice L.
Ghebremichael, Mecal
Hayek, Philip
Mack, Erin
‘Poisonous, Filthy, Loathsome, Damnable Stuff’: The Rhetorical Ecology of Vaccination Concern
title ‘Poisonous, Filthy, Loathsome, Damnable Stuff’: The Rhetorical Ecology of Vaccination Concern
title_full ‘Poisonous, Filthy, Loathsome, Damnable Stuff’: The Rhetorical Ecology of Vaccination Concern
title_fullStr ‘Poisonous, Filthy, Loathsome, Damnable Stuff’: The Rhetorical Ecology of Vaccination Concern
title_full_unstemmed ‘Poisonous, Filthy, Loathsome, Damnable Stuff’: The Rhetorical Ecology of Vaccination Concern
title_short ‘Poisonous, Filthy, Loathsome, Damnable Stuff’: The Rhetorical Ecology of Vaccination Concern
title_sort ‘poisonous, filthy, loathsome, damnable stuff’: the rhetorical ecology of vaccination concern
topic Focus: Vaccines
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4257028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25506275
work_keys_str_mv AT hausmanbernicel poisonousfilthyloathsomedamnablestufftherhetoricalecologyofvaccinationconcern
AT ghebremichaelmecal poisonousfilthyloathsomedamnablestufftherhetoricalecologyofvaccinationconcern
AT hayekphilip poisonousfilthyloathsomedamnablestufftherhetoricalecologyofvaccinationconcern
AT mackerin poisonousfilthyloathsomedamnablestufftherhetoricalecologyofvaccinationconcern