Cargando…

An Overview of Self-Administered Health Literacy Instruments

With the increasing recognition of health literacy as a worldwide research priority, the development and refinement of indices to measure the construct is an important area of inquiry. Furthermore, the proliferation of online resources and research means that there is a growing need for self-adminis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O′Neill, Braden, Gonçalves, Daniela, Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio, Ziebland, Sue, Valderas, Jose
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4257499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25478813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109110
_version_ 1782347759734489088
author O′Neill, Braden
Gonçalves, Daniela
Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio
Ziebland, Sue
Valderas, Jose
author_facet O′Neill, Braden
Gonçalves, Daniela
Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio
Ziebland, Sue
Valderas, Jose
author_sort O′Neill, Braden
collection PubMed
description With the increasing recognition of health literacy as a worldwide research priority, the development and refinement of indices to measure the construct is an important area of inquiry. Furthermore, the proliferation of online resources and research means that there is a growing need for self-administered instruments. We undertook a systematic overview to identify all published self-administered health literacy assessment indices to report their content and considerations associated with their administration. A primary aim of this study was to assist those seeking to employ a self-reported health literacy index to select one that has been developed and validated for an appropriate context, as well as with desired administration characteristics. Systematic searches were carried out in four electronic databases, and studies were included if they reported the development and/or validation of a novel health literacy assessment measure. Data were systematically extracted on key characteristics of the instruments: breadth of construct (“generic” vs. “content- or context- specific” health literacy), whether it was an original instrument or a derivative, country of origin, administration characteristics, age of target population (adult vs. pediatric), and evidence for validity. 35 articles met the inclusion criteria. There were 27 original instruments (27/35; 77.1%) and 8 derivative instruments (8/35; 22.9%). 22 indices measured “general” health literacy (22/35; 62.9%) while the remainder measured condition- or context- specific health literacy (13/35; 37.1%). Most health literacy measures were developed in the United States (22/35; 62.9%), and about half had adequate face, content, and construct validity (16/35; 45.7%). Given the number of measures available for many specific conditions and contexts, and that several have acceptable validity, our findings suggest that the research agenda should shift towards the investigation and elaboration of health literacy as a construct itself, in order for research in health literacy measurement to progress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4257499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42574992014-12-15 An Overview of Self-Administered Health Literacy Instruments O′Neill, Braden Gonçalves, Daniela Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio Ziebland, Sue Valderas, Jose PLoS One Research Article With the increasing recognition of health literacy as a worldwide research priority, the development and refinement of indices to measure the construct is an important area of inquiry. Furthermore, the proliferation of online resources and research means that there is a growing need for self-administered instruments. We undertook a systematic overview to identify all published self-administered health literacy assessment indices to report their content and considerations associated with their administration. A primary aim of this study was to assist those seeking to employ a self-reported health literacy index to select one that has been developed and validated for an appropriate context, as well as with desired administration characteristics. Systematic searches were carried out in four electronic databases, and studies were included if they reported the development and/or validation of a novel health literacy assessment measure. Data were systematically extracted on key characteristics of the instruments: breadth of construct (“generic” vs. “content- or context- specific” health literacy), whether it was an original instrument or a derivative, country of origin, administration characteristics, age of target population (adult vs. pediatric), and evidence for validity. 35 articles met the inclusion criteria. There were 27 original instruments (27/35; 77.1%) and 8 derivative instruments (8/35; 22.9%). 22 indices measured “general” health literacy (22/35; 62.9%) while the remainder measured condition- or context- specific health literacy (13/35; 37.1%). Most health literacy measures were developed in the United States (22/35; 62.9%), and about half had adequate face, content, and construct validity (16/35; 45.7%). Given the number of measures available for many specific conditions and contexts, and that several have acceptable validity, our findings suggest that the research agenda should shift towards the investigation and elaboration of health literacy as a construct itself, in order for research in health literacy measurement to progress. Public Library of Science 2014-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4257499/ /pubmed/25478813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109110 Text en © 2014 O'Neill et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
O′Neill, Braden
Gonçalves, Daniela
Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio
Ziebland, Sue
Valderas, Jose
An Overview of Self-Administered Health Literacy Instruments
title An Overview of Self-Administered Health Literacy Instruments
title_full An Overview of Self-Administered Health Literacy Instruments
title_fullStr An Overview of Self-Administered Health Literacy Instruments
title_full_unstemmed An Overview of Self-Administered Health Literacy Instruments
title_short An Overview of Self-Administered Health Literacy Instruments
title_sort overview of self-administered health literacy instruments
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4257499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25478813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109110
work_keys_str_mv AT oneillbraden anoverviewofselfadministeredhealthliteracyinstruments
AT goncalvesdaniela anoverviewofselfadministeredhealthliteracyinstruments
AT riccicabelloignacio anoverviewofselfadministeredhealthliteracyinstruments
AT zieblandsue anoverviewofselfadministeredhealthliteracyinstruments
AT valderasjose anoverviewofselfadministeredhealthliteracyinstruments
AT oneillbraden overviewofselfadministeredhealthliteracyinstruments
AT goncalvesdaniela overviewofselfadministeredhealthliteracyinstruments
AT riccicabelloignacio overviewofselfadministeredhealthliteracyinstruments
AT zieblandsue overviewofselfadministeredhealthliteracyinstruments
AT valderasjose overviewofselfadministeredhealthliteracyinstruments