Cargando…

Should Prior FIT Results Be Incorporated as an Additional Variable to Estimate Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia? A Prospective Study of 5,813 Screening Colonoscopies

BACKGROUND: Recent studies showed that previous negative results from faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening was associated with lower risk of advanced neoplasia (AN). We evaluated whether prior FIT results should be included to estimate the risk of AN in 2008–2012....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Martin C. S., Ching, Jessica Y. L., Chan, Victor C. W., Shum, Jeffrey P., Lam, Thomas Y. T., Luk, Arthur K. C., Sung, Joseph J. Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4257562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25479102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114332
_version_ 1782347770419478528
author Wong, Martin C. S.
Ching, Jessica Y. L.
Chan, Victor C. W.
Shum, Jeffrey P.
Lam, Thomas Y. T.
Luk, Arthur K. C.
Sung, Joseph J. Y.
author_facet Wong, Martin C. S.
Ching, Jessica Y. L.
Chan, Victor C. W.
Shum, Jeffrey P.
Lam, Thomas Y. T.
Luk, Arthur K. C.
Sung, Joseph J. Y.
author_sort Wong, Martin C. S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent studies showed that previous negative results from faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening was associated with lower risk of advanced neoplasia (AN). We evaluated whether prior FIT results should be included to estimate the risk of AN in 2008–2012. METHODS: A community-based screening practice recruited 5,813 asymptomatic residents aged 50 to 70 years in Hong Kong for CRC screening. We included study participants who had (1). positive FIT with subsequent colonoscopy workup (FIT+ group; n = 356); (2). negative FIT in three consecutive years and received a colonoscopy (FIT- group; n = 857); (3). received colonoscopy without FIT (colonoscopy group; n = 473); and (4). received both colonoscopy and FIT at the same time (combined group; n = 4,127). One binary logistic regression model evaluated whether prior FIT results were associated with colonoscopy findings of AN. RESULTS: The proportion of participants having AN/CRC was 18.0% (FIT+), 5.5% (FIT-), 8.0% (colonoscopy group), and 4.3% (combined group), respectively. When compared with the colonoscopy group, those in the FIT- group were not significantly more or less likely to have AN/CRC (AOR  = 0.77, 95% C.I. = 0.51 to 1.18, p  = 0.230). Having one (AOR = 0.73, 95% C.I. 0.48–1.12, p = 0.151) or three consecutive negative FIT result (AOR = 0.98, 95% C.I. 0.60–1.62, p = 0.944) were not associated with lower risks of AN/CRC. Subjects in the FIT+ group was 3.32-fold (95% C.I. 2.07 to 5.32, p<0.001) more likely to have AN/CRC. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicated that subjects with negative FIT findings could be risk stratified similarly as those who had not previously received FIT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4257562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42575622014-12-15 Should Prior FIT Results Be Incorporated as an Additional Variable to Estimate Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia? A Prospective Study of 5,813 Screening Colonoscopies Wong, Martin C. S. Ching, Jessica Y. L. Chan, Victor C. W. Shum, Jeffrey P. Lam, Thomas Y. T. Luk, Arthur K. C. Sung, Joseph J. Y. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Recent studies showed that previous negative results from faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening was associated with lower risk of advanced neoplasia (AN). We evaluated whether prior FIT results should be included to estimate the risk of AN in 2008–2012. METHODS: A community-based screening practice recruited 5,813 asymptomatic residents aged 50 to 70 years in Hong Kong for CRC screening. We included study participants who had (1). positive FIT with subsequent colonoscopy workup (FIT+ group; n = 356); (2). negative FIT in three consecutive years and received a colonoscopy (FIT- group; n = 857); (3). received colonoscopy without FIT (colonoscopy group; n = 473); and (4). received both colonoscopy and FIT at the same time (combined group; n = 4,127). One binary logistic regression model evaluated whether prior FIT results were associated with colonoscopy findings of AN. RESULTS: The proportion of participants having AN/CRC was 18.0% (FIT+), 5.5% (FIT-), 8.0% (colonoscopy group), and 4.3% (combined group), respectively. When compared with the colonoscopy group, those in the FIT- group were not significantly more or less likely to have AN/CRC (AOR  = 0.77, 95% C.I. = 0.51 to 1.18, p  = 0.230). Having one (AOR = 0.73, 95% C.I. 0.48–1.12, p = 0.151) or three consecutive negative FIT result (AOR = 0.98, 95% C.I. 0.60–1.62, p = 0.944) were not associated with lower risks of AN/CRC. Subjects in the FIT+ group was 3.32-fold (95% C.I. 2.07 to 5.32, p<0.001) more likely to have AN/CRC. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicated that subjects with negative FIT findings could be risk stratified similarly as those who had not previously received FIT. Public Library of Science 2014-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4257562/ /pubmed/25479102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114332 Text en © 2014 Wong et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wong, Martin C. S.
Ching, Jessica Y. L.
Chan, Victor C. W.
Shum, Jeffrey P.
Lam, Thomas Y. T.
Luk, Arthur K. C.
Sung, Joseph J. Y.
Should Prior FIT Results Be Incorporated as an Additional Variable to Estimate Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia? A Prospective Study of 5,813 Screening Colonoscopies
title Should Prior FIT Results Be Incorporated as an Additional Variable to Estimate Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia? A Prospective Study of 5,813 Screening Colonoscopies
title_full Should Prior FIT Results Be Incorporated as an Additional Variable to Estimate Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia? A Prospective Study of 5,813 Screening Colonoscopies
title_fullStr Should Prior FIT Results Be Incorporated as an Additional Variable to Estimate Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia? A Prospective Study of 5,813 Screening Colonoscopies
title_full_unstemmed Should Prior FIT Results Be Incorporated as an Additional Variable to Estimate Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia? A Prospective Study of 5,813 Screening Colonoscopies
title_short Should Prior FIT Results Be Incorporated as an Additional Variable to Estimate Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia? A Prospective Study of 5,813 Screening Colonoscopies
title_sort should prior fit results be incorporated as an additional variable to estimate risk of colorectal neoplasia? a prospective study of 5,813 screening colonoscopies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4257562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25479102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114332
work_keys_str_mv AT wongmartincs shouldpriorfitresultsbeincorporatedasanadditionalvariabletoestimateriskofcolorectalneoplasiaaprospectivestudyof5813screeningcolonoscopies
AT chingjessicayl shouldpriorfitresultsbeincorporatedasanadditionalvariabletoestimateriskofcolorectalneoplasiaaprospectivestudyof5813screeningcolonoscopies
AT chanvictorcw shouldpriorfitresultsbeincorporatedasanadditionalvariabletoestimateriskofcolorectalneoplasiaaprospectivestudyof5813screeningcolonoscopies
AT shumjeffreyp shouldpriorfitresultsbeincorporatedasanadditionalvariabletoestimateriskofcolorectalneoplasiaaprospectivestudyof5813screeningcolonoscopies
AT lamthomasyt shouldpriorfitresultsbeincorporatedasanadditionalvariabletoestimateriskofcolorectalneoplasiaaprospectivestudyof5813screeningcolonoscopies
AT lukarthurkc shouldpriorfitresultsbeincorporatedasanadditionalvariabletoestimateriskofcolorectalneoplasiaaprospectivestudyof5813screeningcolonoscopies
AT sungjosephjy shouldpriorfitresultsbeincorporatedasanadditionalvariabletoestimateriskofcolorectalneoplasiaaprospectivestudyof5813screeningcolonoscopies