Cargando…

Genetic and Morphological Divergence in Three Strains of Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis Commonly Stocked in Lake Superior

Fitness related traits often show spatial variation across populations of widely distributed species. Comparisons of genetic variation among populations in putatively neutral DNA markers and in phenotypic traits susceptible to selection (Q(ST) F(ST) analysis) can be used to determine to what degree...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McKinney, Garrett J., Varian, Anna, Scardina, Julie, Nichols, Krista M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4257586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25479612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113809
Descripción
Sumario:Fitness related traits often show spatial variation across populations of widely distributed species. Comparisons of genetic variation among populations in putatively neutral DNA markers and in phenotypic traits susceptible to selection (Q(ST) F(ST) analysis) can be used to determine to what degree differentiation among populations can be attributed to selection or genetic drift. Traditionally, Q(ST) F(ST) analyses require a large number of populations to achieve sufficient statistical power; however, new methods have been developed that allow Q(ST) F(ST) comparisons to be conducted on as few as two populations if their pedigrees are informative. This study compared genetic and morphological divergence in three strains of brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis that were historically or currently used for stocking in the Lake Superior Basin. Herein we examined if morphological divergence among populations showed temporal variation, and if divergence could be attributed to selection or was indistinguishable from genetic drift. Multivariate Q(ST) F(ST) analysis showed evidence for divergent selection between populations. Univariate analyses suggests that the pattern observed in the multivariate analyses was largely driven by divergent selection for length and weight, and moreover by divergence between the Assinica strain and each of the Iron River and Siskiwit strains rather than divergent selection between each population pair. While it could not be determined if divergence was due to natural selection or inadvertent artificial selection in hatcheries, selected differences were consistent with patterns of domestication commonly found in salmonids.