Cargando…

Reliability of Resting-State Microstate Features in Electroencephalography

BACKGROUND: Electroencephalographic (EEG) microstate analysis is a method of identifying quasi-stable functional brain states (“microstates”) that are altered in a number of neuropsychiatric disorders, suggesting their potential use as biomarkers of neurophysiological health and disease. However, us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khanna, Arjun, Pascual-Leone, Alvaro, Farzan, Faranak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4257589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25479614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114163
_version_ 1782347776132120576
author Khanna, Arjun
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
Farzan, Faranak
author_facet Khanna, Arjun
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
Farzan, Faranak
author_sort Khanna, Arjun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electroencephalographic (EEG) microstate analysis is a method of identifying quasi-stable functional brain states (“microstates”) that are altered in a number of neuropsychiatric disorders, suggesting their potential use as biomarkers of neurophysiological health and disease. However, use of EEG microstates as neurophysiological biomarkers requires assessment of the test-retest reliability of microstate analysis. METHODS: We analyzed resting-state, eyes-closed, 30-channel EEG from 10 healthy subjects over 3 sessions spaced approximately 48 hours apart. We identified four microstate classes and calculated the average duration, frequency, and coverage fraction of these microstates. Using Cronbach's α and the standard error of measurement (SEM) as indicators of reliability, we examined: (1) the test-retest reliability of microstate features using a variety of different approaches; (2) the consistency between TAAHC and k-means clustering algorithms; and (3) whether microstate analysis can be reliably conducted with 19 and 8 electrodes. RESULTS: The approach of identifying a single set of “global” microstate maps showed the highest reliability (mean Cronbach's α>0.8, SEM ≈10% of mean values) compared to microstates derived by each session or each recording. There was notably low reliability in features calculated from maps extracted individually for each recording, suggesting that the analysis is most reliable when maps are held constant. Features were highly consistent across clustering methods (Cronbach's α>0.9). All features had high test-retest reliability with 19 and 8 electrodes. CONCLUSIONS: High test-retest reliability and cross-method consistency of microstate features suggests their potential as biomarkers for assessment of the brain's neurophysiological health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4257589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42575892014-12-15 Reliability of Resting-State Microstate Features in Electroencephalography Khanna, Arjun Pascual-Leone, Alvaro Farzan, Faranak PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Electroencephalographic (EEG) microstate analysis is a method of identifying quasi-stable functional brain states (“microstates”) that are altered in a number of neuropsychiatric disorders, suggesting their potential use as biomarkers of neurophysiological health and disease. However, use of EEG microstates as neurophysiological biomarkers requires assessment of the test-retest reliability of microstate analysis. METHODS: We analyzed resting-state, eyes-closed, 30-channel EEG from 10 healthy subjects over 3 sessions spaced approximately 48 hours apart. We identified four microstate classes and calculated the average duration, frequency, and coverage fraction of these microstates. Using Cronbach's α and the standard error of measurement (SEM) as indicators of reliability, we examined: (1) the test-retest reliability of microstate features using a variety of different approaches; (2) the consistency between TAAHC and k-means clustering algorithms; and (3) whether microstate analysis can be reliably conducted with 19 and 8 electrodes. RESULTS: The approach of identifying a single set of “global” microstate maps showed the highest reliability (mean Cronbach's α>0.8, SEM ≈10% of mean values) compared to microstates derived by each session or each recording. There was notably low reliability in features calculated from maps extracted individually for each recording, suggesting that the analysis is most reliable when maps are held constant. Features were highly consistent across clustering methods (Cronbach's α>0.9). All features had high test-retest reliability with 19 and 8 electrodes. CONCLUSIONS: High test-retest reliability and cross-method consistency of microstate features suggests their potential as biomarkers for assessment of the brain's neurophysiological health. Public Library of Science 2014-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4257589/ /pubmed/25479614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114163 Text en © 2014 Khanna et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khanna, Arjun
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
Farzan, Faranak
Reliability of Resting-State Microstate Features in Electroencephalography
title Reliability of Resting-State Microstate Features in Electroencephalography
title_full Reliability of Resting-State Microstate Features in Electroencephalography
title_fullStr Reliability of Resting-State Microstate Features in Electroencephalography
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of Resting-State Microstate Features in Electroencephalography
title_short Reliability of Resting-State Microstate Features in Electroencephalography
title_sort reliability of resting-state microstate features in electroencephalography
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4257589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25479614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114163
work_keys_str_mv AT khannaarjun reliabilityofrestingstatemicrostatefeaturesinelectroencephalography
AT pascualleonealvaro reliabilityofrestingstatemicrostatefeaturesinelectroencephalography
AT farzanfaranak reliabilityofrestingstatemicrostatefeaturesinelectroencephalography