Cargando…

Polarity Specific Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Interhemispheric Inhibition

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used as a useful interventional brain stimulation technique to improve unilateral upper-limb motor function in healthy humans, as well as in stroke patients. Although tDCS applications are supposed to modify the interhemispheric balance between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tazoe, Toshiki, Endoh, Takashi, Kitamura, Taku, Ogata, Toru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4257682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25478912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114244
_version_ 1782347789970178048
author Tazoe, Toshiki
Endoh, Takashi
Kitamura, Taku
Ogata, Toru
author_facet Tazoe, Toshiki
Endoh, Takashi
Kitamura, Taku
Ogata, Toru
author_sort Tazoe, Toshiki
collection PubMed
description Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used as a useful interventional brain stimulation technique to improve unilateral upper-limb motor function in healthy humans, as well as in stroke patients. Although tDCS applications are supposed to modify the interhemispheric balance between the motor cortices, the tDCS after-effects on interhemispheric interactions are still poorly understood. To address this issue, we investigated the tDCS after-effects on interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) between the primary motor cortices (M1) in healthy humans. Three types of tDCS electrode montage were tested on separate days; anodal tDCS over the right M1, cathodal tDCS over the left M1, bilateral tDCS with anode over the right M1 and cathode over the left M1. Single-pulse and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulations were given to the left M1 and right M1 before and after tDCS to assess the bilateral corticospinal excitabilities and mutual direction of IHI. Regardless of the electrode montages, corticospinal excitability was increased on the same side of anodal stimulation and decreased on the same side of cathodal stimulation. However, neither unilateral tDCS changed the corticospinal excitability at the unstimulated side. Unilateral anodal tDCS increased IHI from the facilitated side M1 to the unchanged side M1, but it did not change IHI in the other direction. Unilateral cathodal tDCS suppressed IHI both from the inhibited side M1 to the unchanged side M1 and from the unchanged side M1 to the inhibited side M1. Bilateral tDCS increased IHI from the facilitated side M1 to the inhibited side M1 and attenuated IHI in the opposite direction. Sham-tDCS affected neither corticospinal excitability nor IHI. These findings indicate that tDCS produced polarity-specific after-effects on the interhemispheric interactions between M1 and that those after-effects on interhemispheric interactions were mainly dependent on whether tDCS resulted in the facilitation or inhibition of the M1 sending interhemispheric volleys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4257682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42576822014-12-15 Polarity Specific Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Interhemispheric Inhibition Tazoe, Toshiki Endoh, Takashi Kitamura, Taku Ogata, Toru PLoS One Research Article Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used as a useful interventional brain stimulation technique to improve unilateral upper-limb motor function in healthy humans, as well as in stroke patients. Although tDCS applications are supposed to modify the interhemispheric balance between the motor cortices, the tDCS after-effects on interhemispheric interactions are still poorly understood. To address this issue, we investigated the tDCS after-effects on interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) between the primary motor cortices (M1) in healthy humans. Three types of tDCS electrode montage were tested on separate days; anodal tDCS over the right M1, cathodal tDCS over the left M1, bilateral tDCS with anode over the right M1 and cathode over the left M1. Single-pulse and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulations were given to the left M1 and right M1 before and after tDCS to assess the bilateral corticospinal excitabilities and mutual direction of IHI. Regardless of the electrode montages, corticospinal excitability was increased on the same side of anodal stimulation and decreased on the same side of cathodal stimulation. However, neither unilateral tDCS changed the corticospinal excitability at the unstimulated side. Unilateral anodal tDCS increased IHI from the facilitated side M1 to the unchanged side M1, but it did not change IHI in the other direction. Unilateral cathodal tDCS suppressed IHI both from the inhibited side M1 to the unchanged side M1 and from the unchanged side M1 to the inhibited side M1. Bilateral tDCS increased IHI from the facilitated side M1 to the inhibited side M1 and attenuated IHI in the opposite direction. Sham-tDCS affected neither corticospinal excitability nor IHI. These findings indicate that tDCS produced polarity-specific after-effects on the interhemispheric interactions between M1 and that those after-effects on interhemispheric interactions were mainly dependent on whether tDCS resulted in the facilitation or inhibition of the M1 sending interhemispheric volleys. Public Library of Science 2014-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4257682/ /pubmed/25478912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114244 Text en © 2014 Tazoe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tazoe, Toshiki
Endoh, Takashi
Kitamura, Taku
Ogata, Toru
Polarity Specific Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Interhemispheric Inhibition
title Polarity Specific Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Interhemispheric Inhibition
title_full Polarity Specific Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Interhemispheric Inhibition
title_fullStr Polarity Specific Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Interhemispheric Inhibition
title_full_unstemmed Polarity Specific Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Interhemispheric Inhibition
title_short Polarity Specific Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Interhemispheric Inhibition
title_sort polarity specific effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on interhemispheric inhibition
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4257682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25478912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114244
work_keys_str_mv AT tazoetoshiki polarityspecificeffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationoninterhemisphericinhibition
AT endohtakashi polarityspecificeffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationoninterhemisphericinhibition
AT kitamurataku polarityspecificeffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationoninterhemisphericinhibition
AT ogatatoru polarityspecificeffectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationoninterhemisphericinhibition