Cargando…

Development of Health Equity Indicators in Primary Health Care Organizations Using a Modified Delphi

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a core set of indicators that could be used for measuring and monitoring the performance of primary health care organizations' capacity and strategies for enhancing equity-oriented care. METHODS: Indicators were constructed based on a review o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Sabrina T., Browne, Annette J., Varcoe, Colleen, Lavoie, Josée, Fridkin, Alycia, Smye, Victoria, Godwin, Olive, Tu, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4257722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25478914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114563
_version_ 1782347797893218304
author Wong, Sabrina T.
Browne, Annette J.
Varcoe, Colleen
Lavoie, Josée
Fridkin, Alycia
Smye, Victoria
Godwin, Olive
Tu, David
author_facet Wong, Sabrina T.
Browne, Annette J.
Varcoe, Colleen
Lavoie, Josée
Fridkin, Alycia
Smye, Victoria
Godwin, Olive
Tu, David
author_sort Wong, Sabrina T.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a core set of indicators that could be used for measuring and monitoring the performance of primary health care organizations' capacity and strategies for enhancing equity-oriented care. METHODS: Indicators were constructed based on a review of the literature and a thematic analysis of interview data with patients and staff (n = 114) using procedures for qualitatively derived data. We used a modified Delphi process where the indicators were circulated to staff at the Health Centers who served as participants (n = 63) over two rounds. Indicators were considered part of a priority set of health equity indicators if they received an overall importance rating of>8.0, on a scale of 1–9, where a higher score meant more importance. RESULTS: Seventeen indicators make up the priority set. Items were eliminated because they were rated as low importance (<8.0) in both rounds and were either redundant or more than one participant commented that taking action on the indicator was highly unlikely. In order to achieve health care equity, performance at the organizational level is as important as assessing the performance of staff. Two of the highest rated “treatment” or processes of care indicators reflects the need for culturally safe and trauma and violence-informed care. There are four indicators that can be used to measure outcomes which can be directly attributable to equity responsive primary health care. DISCUSSION: These indicators and subsequent development of items can be used to measure equity in the domains of treatment and outcomes. These areas represent targets for higher performance in relation to equity for organizations (e.g., funding allocations to ongoing training in equity-oriented care provision) and providers (e.g., reflexive practice, skill in working with the health effects of trauma).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4257722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42577222014-12-15 Development of Health Equity Indicators in Primary Health Care Organizations Using a Modified Delphi Wong, Sabrina T. Browne, Annette J. Varcoe, Colleen Lavoie, Josée Fridkin, Alycia Smye, Victoria Godwin, Olive Tu, David PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a core set of indicators that could be used for measuring and monitoring the performance of primary health care organizations' capacity and strategies for enhancing equity-oriented care. METHODS: Indicators were constructed based on a review of the literature and a thematic analysis of interview data with patients and staff (n = 114) using procedures for qualitatively derived data. We used a modified Delphi process where the indicators were circulated to staff at the Health Centers who served as participants (n = 63) over two rounds. Indicators were considered part of a priority set of health equity indicators if they received an overall importance rating of>8.0, on a scale of 1–9, where a higher score meant more importance. RESULTS: Seventeen indicators make up the priority set. Items were eliminated because they were rated as low importance (<8.0) in both rounds and were either redundant or more than one participant commented that taking action on the indicator was highly unlikely. In order to achieve health care equity, performance at the organizational level is as important as assessing the performance of staff. Two of the highest rated “treatment” or processes of care indicators reflects the need for culturally safe and trauma and violence-informed care. There are four indicators that can be used to measure outcomes which can be directly attributable to equity responsive primary health care. DISCUSSION: These indicators and subsequent development of items can be used to measure equity in the domains of treatment and outcomes. These areas represent targets for higher performance in relation to equity for organizations (e.g., funding allocations to ongoing training in equity-oriented care provision) and providers (e.g., reflexive practice, skill in working with the health effects of trauma). Public Library of Science 2014-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4257722/ /pubmed/25478914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114563 Text en © 2014 Wong et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wong, Sabrina T.
Browne, Annette J.
Varcoe, Colleen
Lavoie, Josée
Fridkin, Alycia
Smye, Victoria
Godwin, Olive
Tu, David
Development of Health Equity Indicators in Primary Health Care Organizations Using a Modified Delphi
title Development of Health Equity Indicators in Primary Health Care Organizations Using a Modified Delphi
title_full Development of Health Equity Indicators in Primary Health Care Organizations Using a Modified Delphi
title_fullStr Development of Health Equity Indicators in Primary Health Care Organizations Using a Modified Delphi
title_full_unstemmed Development of Health Equity Indicators in Primary Health Care Organizations Using a Modified Delphi
title_short Development of Health Equity Indicators in Primary Health Care Organizations Using a Modified Delphi
title_sort development of health equity indicators in primary health care organizations using a modified delphi
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4257722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25478914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114563
work_keys_str_mv AT wongsabrinat developmentofhealthequityindicatorsinprimaryhealthcareorganizationsusingamodifieddelphi
AT browneannettej developmentofhealthequityindicatorsinprimaryhealthcareorganizationsusingamodifieddelphi
AT varcoecolleen developmentofhealthequityindicatorsinprimaryhealthcareorganizationsusingamodifieddelphi
AT lavoiejosee developmentofhealthequityindicatorsinprimaryhealthcareorganizationsusingamodifieddelphi
AT fridkinalycia developmentofhealthequityindicatorsinprimaryhealthcareorganizationsusingamodifieddelphi
AT smyevictoria developmentofhealthequityindicatorsinprimaryhealthcareorganizationsusingamodifieddelphi
AT godwinolive developmentofhealthequityindicatorsinprimaryhealthcareorganizationsusingamodifieddelphi
AT tudavid developmentofhealthequityindicatorsinprimaryhealthcareorganizationsusingamodifieddelphi