Cargando…

Perceived difficulty and appropriateness of decision making by General Practitioners: a systematic review of scenario studies

BACKGROUND: Health-care quality in primary care depends largely on the appropriateness of General Practitioners’ (GPs; Primary Care or Family Physicians) decisions, which may be influenced by how difficult they perceive decisions to be. Patient scenarios (clinical or case vignettes) are widely used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCleary, Nicola, Ramsay, Craig R, Francis, Jill J, Campbell, Marion K, Allan, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4258016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25471752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0621-2
_version_ 1782347828730789888
author McCleary, Nicola
Ramsay, Craig R
Francis, Jill J
Campbell, Marion K
Allan, Julia
author_facet McCleary, Nicola
Ramsay, Craig R
Francis, Jill J
Campbell, Marion K
Allan, Julia
author_sort McCleary, Nicola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health-care quality in primary care depends largely on the appropriateness of General Practitioners’ (GPs; Primary Care or Family Physicians) decisions, which may be influenced by how difficult they perceive decisions to be. Patient scenarios (clinical or case vignettes) are widely used to investigate GPs’ decision making. This review aimed to identify the extent to which perceived decision difficulty, decision appropriateness, and their relationship have been assessed in scenario studies of GPs’ decision making; identify possible determinants of difficulty and appropriateness; and investigate the relationship between difficulty and appropriateness. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for scenario studies of GPs’ decision making. One author completed article screening. Ten percent of titles and abstracts were checked by an independent volunteer, resulting in 91% agreement. Data on decision difficulty and appropriateness were extracted by one author and descriptively synthesised. Chi-squared tests were used to explore associations between decision appropriateness, decision type and decision appropriateness assessment method. RESULTS: Of 152 included studies, 66 assessed decision appropriateness and five assessed perceived difficulty. While no studies assessed the relationship between perceived difficulty and appropriateness, one study objectively varied the difficulty of the scenarios and assessed the relationship between a measure of objective difficulty and appropriateness. Across 38 studies where calculations were possible, 62% of the decisions were appropriate as defined by the appropriateness standard used. Chi-squared tests identified statistically significant associations between decision appropriateness, decision type and decision appropriateness assessment method. Findings suggested a negative relationship between decision difficulty and appropriateness, while interventions may have the potential to reduce perceived difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: Scenario-based research into GPs’ decisions rarely considers the relationship between perceived decision difficulty and decision appropriateness. The links between these decisional components require further investigation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-014-0621-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4258016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42580162014-12-07 Perceived difficulty and appropriateness of decision making by General Practitioners: a systematic review of scenario studies McCleary, Nicola Ramsay, Craig R Francis, Jill J Campbell, Marion K Allan, Julia BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Health-care quality in primary care depends largely on the appropriateness of General Practitioners’ (GPs; Primary Care or Family Physicians) decisions, which may be influenced by how difficult they perceive decisions to be. Patient scenarios (clinical or case vignettes) are widely used to investigate GPs’ decision making. This review aimed to identify the extent to which perceived decision difficulty, decision appropriateness, and their relationship have been assessed in scenario studies of GPs’ decision making; identify possible determinants of difficulty and appropriateness; and investigate the relationship between difficulty and appropriateness. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for scenario studies of GPs’ decision making. One author completed article screening. Ten percent of titles and abstracts were checked by an independent volunteer, resulting in 91% agreement. Data on decision difficulty and appropriateness were extracted by one author and descriptively synthesised. Chi-squared tests were used to explore associations between decision appropriateness, decision type and decision appropriateness assessment method. RESULTS: Of 152 included studies, 66 assessed decision appropriateness and five assessed perceived difficulty. While no studies assessed the relationship between perceived difficulty and appropriateness, one study objectively varied the difficulty of the scenarios and assessed the relationship between a measure of objective difficulty and appropriateness. Across 38 studies where calculations were possible, 62% of the decisions were appropriate as defined by the appropriateness standard used. Chi-squared tests identified statistically significant associations between decision appropriateness, decision type and decision appropriateness assessment method. Findings suggested a negative relationship between decision difficulty and appropriateness, while interventions may have the potential to reduce perceived difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: Scenario-based research into GPs’ decisions rarely considers the relationship between perceived decision difficulty and decision appropriateness. The links between these decisional components require further investigation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-014-0621-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4258016/ /pubmed/25471752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0621-2 Text en © McCleary et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
McCleary, Nicola
Ramsay, Craig R
Francis, Jill J
Campbell, Marion K
Allan, Julia
Perceived difficulty and appropriateness of decision making by General Practitioners: a systematic review of scenario studies
title Perceived difficulty and appropriateness of decision making by General Practitioners: a systematic review of scenario studies
title_full Perceived difficulty and appropriateness of decision making by General Practitioners: a systematic review of scenario studies
title_fullStr Perceived difficulty and appropriateness of decision making by General Practitioners: a systematic review of scenario studies
title_full_unstemmed Perceived difficulty and appropriateness of decision making by General Practitioners: a systematic review of scenario studies
title_short Perceived difficulty and appropriateness of decision making by General Practitioners: a systematic review of scenario studies
title_sort perceived difficulty and appropriateness of decision making by general practitioners: a systematic review of scenario studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4258016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25471752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0621-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mcclearynicola perceiveddifficultyandappropriatenessofdecisionmakingbygeneralpractitionersasystematicreviewofscenariostudies
AT ramsaycraigr perceiveddifficultyandappropriatenessofdecisionmakingbygeneralpractitionersasystematicreviewofscenariostudies
AT francisjillj perceiveddifficultyandappropriatenessofdecisionmakingbygeneralpractitionersasystematicreviewofscenariostudies
AT campbellmarionk perceiveddifficultyandappropriatenessofdecisionmakingbygeneralpractitionersasystematicreviewofscenariostudies
AT allanjulia perceiveddifficultyandappropriatenessofdecisionmakingbygeneralpractitionersasystematicreviewofscenariostudies