Cargando…

Differences in Anatomy and Kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA Patients: Influence on Implant Positioning and Subsequent Loading Conditions in Mobile Bearing Knees

The objective of our study was to determine the mechanical stress conditions under tibiofemoral loading with an overlay of knee kinematics in deep flexion on two different mobile bearing designs in comparison to in vivo failure modes. This study investigates the seldom but severe complication of fat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maas, Allan, Kim, Tae Kyun, Miehlke, Rolf K., Hagen, Thomas, Grupp, Thomas M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4258361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25538943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/612838
_version_ 1782347882914906112
author Maas, Allan
Kim, Tae Kyun
Miehlke, Rolf K.
Hagen, Thomas
Grupp, Thomas M.
author_facet Maas, Allan
Kim, Tae Kyun
Miehlke, Rolf K.
Hagen, Thomas
Grupp, Thomas M.
author_sort Maas, Allan
collection PubMed
description The objective of our study was to determine the mechanical stress conditions under tibiofemoral loading with an overlay of knee kinematics in deep flexion on two different mobile bearing designs in comparison to in vivo failure modes. This study investigates the seldom but severe complication of fatigue failure of polyethylene components at mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty designs. Assuming a combination of a floor-based lifestyle and tibial malrotation as a possible reason for a higher failure rate in Asian countries we developed a simplified finite element model considering a tibiofemoral roll-back angle of 22° and the range of rotational motion of a clinically established floating platform design (e.motion FP) at a knee flexion angle of 120° in order to compare our results to failure modes found in retrieved implants. Compared to the failure mode observed in the clinical retrievals the locations of the occurring stress maxima as well as the tensile stress distribution show analogies. From our observations, we conclude that the newly introduced finite element model with an overlay of deep knee flexion (lateral roll-back) and considerable internally rotated tibia implant positioning is an appropriate analysis for knee design optimizations and a suitable method to predict clinical failure modes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4258361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42583612014-12-23 Differences in Anatomy and Kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA Patients: Influence on Implant Positioning and Subsequent Loading Conditions in Mobile Bearing Knees Maas, Allan Kim, Tae Kyun Miehlke, Rolf K. Hagen, Thomas Grupp, Thomas M. Biomed Res Int Research Article The objective of our study was to determine the mechanical stress conditions under tibiofemoral loading with an overlay of knee kinematics in deep flexion on two different mobile bearing designs in comparison to in vivo failure modes. This study investigates the seldom but severe complication of fatigue failure of polyethylene components at mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty designs. Assuming a combination of a floor-based lifestyle and tibial malrotation as a possible reason for a higher failure rate in Asian countries we developed a simplified finite element model considering a tibiofemoral roll-back angle of 22° and the range of rotational motion of a clinically established floating platform design (e.motion FP) at a knee flexion angle of 120° in order to compare our results to failure modes found in retrieved implants. Compared to the failure mode observed in the clinical retrievals the locations of the occurring stress maxima as well as the tensile stress distribution show analogies. From our observations, we conclude that the newly introduced finite element model with an overlay of deep knee flexion (lateral roll-back) and considerable internally rotated tibia implant positioning is an appropriate analysis for knee design optimizations and a suitable method to predict clinical failure modes. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4258361/ /pubmed/25538943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/612838 Text en Copyright © 2014 Allan Maas et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Maas, Allan
Kim, Tae Kyun
Miehlke, Rolf K.
Hagen, Thomas
Grupp, Thomas M.
Differences in Anatomy and Kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA Patients: Influence on Implant Positioning and Subsequent Loading Conditions in Mobile Bearing Knees
title Differences in Anatomy and Kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA Patients: Influence on Implant Positioning and Subsequent Loading Conditions in Mobile Bearing Knees
title_full Differences in Anatomy and Kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA Patients: Influence on Implant Positioning and Subsequent Loading Conditions in Mobile Bearing Knees
title_fullStr Differences in Anatomy and Kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA Patients: Influence on Implant Positioning and Subsequent Loading Conditions in Mobile Bearing Knees
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Anatomy and Kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA Patients: Influence on Implant Positioning and Subsequent Loading Conditions in Mobile Bearing Knees
title_short Differences in Anatomy and Kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA Patients: Influence on Implant Positioning and Subsequent Loading Conditions in Mobile Bearing Knees
title_sort differences in anatomy and kinematics in asian and caucasian tka patients: influence on implant positioning and subsequent loading conditions in mobile bearing knees
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4258361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25538943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/612838
work_keys_str_mv AT maasallan differencesinanatomyandkinematicsinasianandcaucasiantkapatientsinfluenceonimplantpositioningandsubsequentloadingconditionsinmobilebearingknees
AT kimtaekyun differencesinanatomyandkinematicsinasianandcaucasiantkapatientsinfluenceonimplantpositioningandsubsequentloadingconditionsinmobilebearingknees
AT miehlkerolfk differencesinanatomyandkinematicsinasianandcaucasiantkapatientsinfluenceonimplantpositioningandsubsequentloadingconditionsinmobilebearingknees
AT hagenthomas differencesinanatomyandkinematicsinasianandcaucasiantkapatientsinfluenceonimplantpositioningandsubsequentloadingconditionsinmobilebearingknees
AT gruppthomasm differencesinanatomyandkinematicsinasianandcaucasiantkapatientsinfluenceonimplantpositioningandsubsequentloadingconditionsinmobilebearingknees