Cargando…
Differences in Anatomy and Kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA Patients: Influence on Implant Positioning and Subsequent Loading Conditions in Mobile Bearing Knees
The objective of our study was to determine the mechanical stress conditions under tibiofemoral loading with an overlay of knee kinematics in deep flexion on two different mobile bearing designs in comparison to in vivo failure modes. This study investigates the seldom but severe complication of fat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4258361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25538943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/612838 |
_version_ | 1782347882914906112 |
---|---|
author | Maas, Allan Kim, Tae Kyun Miehlke, Rolf K. Hagen, Thomas Grupp, Thomas M. |
author_facet | Maas, Allan Kim, Tae Kyun Miehlke, Rolf K. Hagen, Thomas Grupp, Thomas M. |
author_sort | Maas, Allan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of our study was to determine the mechanical stress conditions under tibiofemoral loading with an overlay of knee kinematics in deep flexion on two different mobile bearing designs in comparison to in vivo failure modes. This study investigates the seldom but severe complication of fatigue failure of polyethylene components at mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty designs. Assuming a combination of a floor-based lifestyle and tibial malrotation as a possible reason for a higher failure rate in Asian countries we developed a simplified finite element model considering a tibiofemoral roll-back angle of 22° and the range of rotational motion of a clinically established floating platform design (e.motion FP) at a knee flexion angle of 120° in order to compare our results to failure modes found in retrieved implants. Compared to the failure mode observed in the clinical retrievals the locations of the occurring stress maxima as well as the tensile stress distribution show analogies. From our observations, we conclude that the newly introduced finite element model with an overlay of deep knee flexion (lateral roll-back) and considerable internally rotated tibia implant positioning is an appropriate analysis for knee design optimizations and a suitable method to predict clinical failure modes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4258361 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42583612014-12-23 Differences in Anatomy and Kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA Patients: Influence on Implant Positioning and Subsequent Loading Conditions in Mobile Bearing Knees Maas, Allan Kim, Tae Kyun Miehlke, Rolf K. Hagen, Thomas Grupp, Thomas M. Biomed Res Int Research Article The objective of our study was to determine the mechanical stress conditions under tibiofemoral loading with an overlay of knee kinematics in deep flexion on two different mobile bearing designs in comparison to in vivo failure modes. This study investigates the seldom but severe complication of fatigue failure of polyethylene components at mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty designs. Assuming a combination of a floor-based lifestyle and tibial malrotation as a possible reason for a higher failure rate in Asian countries we developed a simplified finite element model considering a tibiofemoral roll-back angle of 22° and the range of rotational motion of a clinically established floating platform design (e.motion FP) at a knee flexion angle of 120° in order to compare our results to failure modes found in retrieved implants. Compared to the failure mode observed in the clinical retrievals the locations of the occurring stress maxima as well as the tensile stress distribution show analogies. From our observations, we conclude that the newly introduced finite element model with an overlay of deep knee flexion (lateral roll-back) and considerable internally rotated tibia implant positioning is an appropriate analysis for knee design optimizations and a suitable method to predict clinical failure modes. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4258361/ /pubmed/25538943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/612838 Text en Copyright © 2014 Allan Maas et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Maas, Allan Kim, Tae Kyun Miehlke, Rolf K. Hagen, Thomas Grupp, Thomas M. Differences in Anatomy and Kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA Patients: Influence on Implant Positioning and Subsequent Loading Conditions in Mobile Bearing Knees |
title | Differences in Anatomy and Kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA Patients: Influence on Implant Positioning and Subsequent Loading Conditions in Mobile Bearing Knees |
title_full | Differences in Anatomy and Kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA Patients: Influence on Implant Positioning and Subsequent Loading Conditions in Mobile Bearing Knees |
title_fullStr | Differences in Anatomy and Kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA Patients: Influence on Implant Positioning and Subsequent Loading Conditions in Mobile Bearing Knees |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in Anatomy and Kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA Patients: Influence on Implant Positioning and Subsequent Loading Conditions in Mobile Bearing Knees |
title_short | Differences in Anatomy and Kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA Patients: Influence on Implant Positioning and Subsequent Loading Conditions in Mobile Bearing Knees |
title_sort | differences in anatomy and kinematics in asian and caucasian tka patients: influence on implant positioning and subsequent loading conditions in mobile bearing knees |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4258361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25538943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/612838 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maasallan differencesinanatomyandkinematicsinasianandcaucasiantkapatientsinfluenceonimplantpositioningandsubsequentloadingconditionsinmobilebearingknees AT kimtaekyun differencesinanatomyandkinematicsinasianandcaucasiantkapatientsinfluenceonimplantpositioningandsubsequentloadingconditionsinmobilebearingknees AT miehlkerolfk differencesinanatomyandkinematicsinasianandcaucasiantkapatientsinfluenceonimplantpositioningandsubsequentloadingconditionsinmobilebearingknees AT hagenthomas differencesinanatomyandkinematicsinasianandcaucasiantkapatientsinfluenceonimplantpositioningandsubsequentloadingconditionsinmobilebearingknees AT gruppthomasm differencesinanatomyandkinematicsinasianandcaucasiantkapatientsinfluenceonimplantpositioningandsubsequentloadingconditionsinmobilebearingknees |